Green v. Hil et al
| Andra Green |
| Montero Lamar Hil, Lil Nas-X- and Jack Harlow |
| 2:2022cv00448 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark S Davis |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Submission by Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 7 Amendment to #1 Complaint by Andra Green. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Andra Green re #3 . (jmey, ) |
| Filing 5 Submission by Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Andra Green re #2 . (jmey, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, a signed amendment to the Complaint that identifies the citizenship of Defendant Jack Harlow. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 11/7/2022. Copies mailed 11/7/2022.(jmey, )
|
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Jack Harlow, Montero Lamar Hil (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Andra Green. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
