Stith v. Brunswick County Circuit Court
| Michael Stith |
| Brunswick County Circuit Court |
| 2:2022cv00481 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark S Davis |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Response to #10 Order filed by Michael Stith. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER. #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order Petitioner shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 12/16/2022. Copies mailed 12/16/2022. (jmey, )
|
| Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 8 Submission by Petitioner. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 7 Letter to Meherrin River Regional Jail, Custodian of Inmate Accounts. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Stith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 5 Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by Michael Stith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Petitioner must accomplish one of the following actions: 1. Remit $5.00 filing fee. 2. Complete and submit to the Clerk of this Court an "Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis." The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and two copies of an Application to Proceed Forma Pauperis, with the case number affixed, to the Petitioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 11/28/2022. Copies mailed 11/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in forma Pauperis)(jmey, )
|
| Filing 3 REFERRAL ORDER. This matter is hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller for further proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Petitioner. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 11/21/2022. Copies mailed 11/22/2022.(jmey, ) |
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION, Conditionally filed for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Michael Stith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stith v. Brunswick County Circuit Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Stith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Brunswick County Circuit Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
