Barrett v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| John M. Barrett |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association doing business as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage |
| 2:2022cv00509 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Robert J Krask |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Ellis, Alison) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL: The court has been advised that this matter is settled. At the direction of the court, we must notify you that the matter will be dismissed with prejudice unless an otherwise appropriate dismissal order is submitted by counsel within eleven (11) days from the date of this notice. This deadline may be extended only by an order of court obtained by counsel. If this matter requires court approval of the settlement, you should arrange an appropriate date for a hearing on settlement approval with the assigned judges calendar clerk. The court appreciates your giving this matter your prompt attention. (mrees, ) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by John M. Barrett. (Barrett, John) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (Ellis, Alison) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response #4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's motion to delay his response to the motion to dismiss, pending a ruling on the motion to remand is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is GRANTED, such that plaintiff shall file a response to the motion to dismiss not later than 1/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 12/24/2022. (Krask, Robert)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Krask. #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss (mrees, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss by John M. Barrett. (Barrett, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by John M. Barrett to Waive Oral Argument (Barrett, John) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by John M. Barrett. (Barrett, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by John M. Barrett. (Barrett, John) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ellis, Alison) |
| Filing 4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (Ellis, Alison) |
| Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (Ellis, Alison) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8701737.), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Complaint, Summons, Consent Order, and Amended Complaint), #2 Exhibit 2 (State Court Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal without Exhibits), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ellis, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
