Pham v. Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
| Kurt Pham |
| Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Donna Mills, Pamela Jones-Watford, Lorenzo Green and Michael Clark |
| 2:2023cv00048 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Motion for leave to amend Complaint and Injunction by Kurt Pham. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 2nd Amended Complaint for Civil Case)(epri, ) |
| Filing 14 (Subject to Defect - Unsigned) Response to Motion to Dismiss/Memorandum filed by Kurt Pham. #2 Exhibit) . Modified on 4/6/2023 (epri, ). |
| Filing 13 Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Roseboro,. filed by Michael Clark, Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority. (Bean, Gregory) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Roseboro,. by Michael Clark, Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority. (Attachments: #1 Roseboro Notice)(Bean, Gregory) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Scott Bean on behalf of Michael Clark, Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority (Bean, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 Four (4) SUMMONSES Returned Executed as to Michael Clark served on 3/7/2023; as to Lorenzo Green served on 3/7/2023; as to Pamela Jones-Watford served on 3/7/2023; as to Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority served on 3/7/2023. (epri, ) |
| Filing 9 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Donna Mills. (epri, ) |
| Filing 8 Four (4) Summonses Reissued as to Michael Clark, Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority. Pro se plaintiff picked up service packets on 3.3.23. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Michael Clark, Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, filed by Kurt Pham.(epri, ) |
| Filing 6 Four (4) Summonses Issued as to Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Donna Mills, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority. Service packets mailed to pro se plaintiff on 2.24.23. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Kurt Pham. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri, ) |
| Filing 4 Corrected and signed COMPLAINT against Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Donna Mills, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, filed by Kurt Pham. #1 Envelope) (epri, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to sign and resubmit his Complaint to the court within thirty days of the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiff's Motion to E-File, ECF No. 2, is DENIED. A copy of this Order was sent to pro se plaintiff as DIRECTED on 2.16.23. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 2/16/2023. (epri, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Electronic Filing Pro Se by Kurt Pham. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 (Subject to Defect - Improper signature) COMPLAINT against Lorenzo Green, Pamela Jones-Watford, Donna Mills, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 200000635.), filed by Kurt Pham. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
