Marl v. Stolle et al
| Bryce Marl |
| Ken Stolle and Abdul Jamaludeen |
| 2:2023cv00171 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Consent to Collection of Fees by Bryce Marl. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, Plaintiff is ORDERED to either sign the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees form and return it to the court or pay the full statutory filing fee of $350.00 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry of this Order. Copies sent as DIRECTED on 4.28.23. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes and filed on 4/28/23. (epri, )
|
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons Defendant STOLLE by Bryce Marl. (Weiner, Blake) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons Defendant JAMALUDEEN by Bryce Marl. (Weiner, Blake) |
| Filing 2 MOTION Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bryce Marl. (Weiner, Blake) |
| Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Bryce Marl. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weiner, Blake) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
