Landry v. Leu
| James L. Landry |
| David Leu |
| 2:2023cv00327 |
| July 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark S Davis |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order Petitioner shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 8/21/2023. Copies mailed 8/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (jmey, )
|
| Filing 7 Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by James L. Landry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 200001960. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 6 Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by James L. Landry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by James L. Landry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (jmey, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Petitioner must accomplish one of the following actions: 1. Remit $5.00 filing fee. 2. Complete and submit to the Clerk of this Court an "Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis." The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order and two copies of an Application to Proceed Forma Pauperis, with the case number affixed, to the Petitioner. The Petitioner is DIRECTED to file one copy of the form with the court and retain the other copy for his records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 7/12/2023. Copies mailed 7/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in forma Pauperis)(jmey, )
|
| Filing 3 REFERRAL ORDER. It is ORDERED that this matter is hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller for further proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Petitioner. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 7/10/2023. Copies mailed 7/10/2023.(jmey, ) |
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION, Conditionally filed (SUBJECT TO DEFECT) for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by James L. Landry. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Landry v. Leu | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James L. Landry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: David Leu | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
