Snyder v. NaphCare, Inc.
| Norma Jean Snyder |
| NaphCare, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00358 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Medical Malpractice |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by NaphCare, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Quirk, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 Respondent's BRIEF by Norma Jean Snyder . (Favaloro, Mark) |
| Filing 11 Opposition to #8 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal, #9 Memorandum in Support, filed by Norma Jean Snyder. (Favaloro, Mark) |
| Filing 10 Rule 26 Disclosure by Norma Jean Snyder. (Favaloro, Mark) |
| IPTC set for 9/5/2023 is CANCELLED by the Court to be rescheduled once the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 8) is ripe. (kgall) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by NaphCare, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Quirk, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal by NaphCare, Inc.. (Quirk, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaisha Sanaullah on behalf of NaphCare, Inc. (Sanaullah, Aaisha) |
Filing 6
Order Setting Pretrial Conference. Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/5/2023 at 10:30 AM in Norfolk Remote before District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 8/7/2023. (kgall)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Grace Morse-McNelis on behalf of NaphCare, Inc. (Morse-McNelis, Grace) |
| Filing 4 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by NaphCare, Inc. (epri, ) |
| Filing 3 Citizenship Disclosure Form (Local Rule 7.1) by NaphCare, Inc.. (Quirk, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by NaphCare, Inc.. (Quirk, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9043450.), filed by NaphCare, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet #2 Exhibit A) (Quirk, Christopher) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
| Referred for 16(b). (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Snyder v. NaphCare, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Norma Jean Snyder | |
| Represented By: | Mark John Favaloro |
| Represented By: | Ted G. Yoakam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NaphCare, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Grace Morse-McNelis |
| Represented By: | Christopher Fitzjames Quirk |
| Represented By: | Aaisha Sanaullah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
