Searcy v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff: Danyell Searcy
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Case Number: 2:2023cv00449
Filed: September 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Arenda L Wright Allen
Referring Judge: Robert J Krask
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2023 Filing 11 First MOTION for Court to Assist in Resolving Ambiguities in Offer of Judgment by Danyell Searcy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Rule 68 Offer)(Feinman, James)
October 6, 2023 Refer for 16(b) (mrees)
October 5, 2023 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Skanes, Mark)
October 5, 2023 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.(Skanes, Mark)
October 3, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danyell Searcy (Feinman, James)
September 19, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danyell Searcy (Feinman, James)
September 19, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danyell Searcy Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC served on 9/15/2023, answer due 10/6/2023 (Feinman, James)
September 19, 2023 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for complaint on 09/19/2023, filed by Danyell Searcy. (Feinman, James)
September 14, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Motions Procedures)(afar)
September 13, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Danyell Searcy. (Feinman, James)
September 13, 2023 Filing 2 Citizenship Disclosure Form (Local Rule 7.1) by Danyell Searcy. (Feinman, James)
September 13, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9121648.), filed by Danyell Searcy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Feinman, James)
September 13, 2023 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, )
September 13, 2023 Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1, a Citizenship Disclosure Form should be filed in any case noting a diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. The form can be found on our internet site and should promptly be filed. (epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Searcy v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danyell Searcy
Represented By: James Ben Feinman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Represented By: Mark William Skanes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?