Myers v. U-Haul Co. of Virginia et al
| Brandon Nicholas Myers |
| U-Haul Co. of Virginia, Rebecca Gay, Virginia Ulanski and Bernadette Walker |
| 2:2023cv00455 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Jamar K Walker |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss, ECF #4 is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jamar K. Walker on 11/9/2023. (copy mailed 11/9/23) (afar)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice by Brandon Nicholas Myers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO SWITCH TO A JURY TRIAL by Brandon Nicholas Myers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Four (4) Summonses Issued as to Rebecca Gay, U-Haul Co. of Virginia, Virginia Ulanski, Bernadette Walker. Service packets mailed to pro se plaintiff on 9.18.23. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rebecca Gay, U-Haul Co. of Virginia, Virginia Ulanski, Bernadette Walker ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 200002352.), filed by Brandon Nicholas Myers. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Receipt)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
