Bando Auto Transport, LLC et al v. PACCAR, Inc. et al
| Bando Auto Transport, LLC and Stephen Bando |
| PACCAR, Inc. and East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00456 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Robert J Krask |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by PACCAR, Inc.. (Moriarty, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT re #11 MOTION to Dismiss by East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc.. (Dorans, Barry) |
| Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc.. (Dorans, Barry) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Dorans, Barry) |
| Filing 10 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc.. (Dorans, Barry) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry Dorans on behalf of East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc. (Dorans, Barry) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephen Bando, Bando Auto Transport, LLC East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc. served on 10/2/2023, answer due 10/23/2023 (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to East Coast Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc., and PACCAR, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motion Procedures)(Vpea) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bando Auto Transport, LLC. (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Stephen Bando, Bando Auto Transport, LLC. (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons by Stephen Bando, Bando Auto Transport, LLC. (Feinman, James) |
| Notice of Correction re 2 Proposed Summons, 3 Proposed Summons. ECF numbers 2 and 3 are incorrectly saved PDF fillable form which we have removed. Please refile the documents after saving them correctly. (epri, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. ECF #1 ] was the party's first appearance which should have been accompanied by a financial disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 7.1. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1, a Citizenship Disclosure Form should be filed in any case noting a diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. The form can be found on our internet site and should promptly be filed. (epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Stephen Bando, Bando Auto Transport, LLC. (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Stephen Bando, Bando Auto Transport, LLC. (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9125755.), filed by Stephen Bando, Bando Auto Transport, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Feinman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
