Simpson v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lamar Simpson
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union, Navy Federal Employee and John J. Tisol
Case Number: 2:2023cv00621
Filed: December 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Mark S Davis
Referring Judge: Lawrence R Leonard
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2024 Filing 5 Consent to Collection of Fees by Jonathan Lamar Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(jmey, )
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff is ORDERED to sign the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees form and RETURN IT TO THE COURT within twenty-one (21) days of the entry date of this Order. If Plaintiff does not wish to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay both the $350.00 statutory filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee (a total of $402.00) within twenty-one (21) days of the entry date of this Order. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to comply with the procedural requirements outlined in the enclosed document titled "Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint." The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order, a copy of the Consent to Collection of Fees form, and a copy of the document titled "Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint" to Plaintiff. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 12/15/2023. Copies mailed 12/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Collection of Fees form and Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint) (jmey, )
December 6, 2023 Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, )
December 6, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Lamar Simpson. (jmey, )
December 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Navy Federal Credit Union, Navy Federal Employee, John J. Tisol (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Jonathan Lamar Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lamar Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navy Federal Employee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John J. Tisol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?