Wilborn v. Wang et al
Kenneth Dean Wilborn |
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette |
2:2023cv00677 |
December 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Raymond A Jackson |
Douglas E Miller |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case shall be, and hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Transfer Order to Plaintiff and to effectuate the transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/2/2024. Copies mailed 1/2/2024.(jmey, ) |
Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (jmey, ) |
Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Dean Wilborn. (jmey, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Dr. Mark Amonette, Dr. Ohia, Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Kenneth Dean Wilborn. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.