Francis v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc. et al
Marquis Deshawn Francis |
Sterling Infosystems, Inc. and ClearStar, Inc. |
2:2024cv00120 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Arenda L Wright Allen |
Robert J Krask |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Refer for 16(b) (afar) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by Sterling Infosystems, Inc..(Montgomery, John) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason Spak, as certified by local counsel Ronald Page, Jr., for Defendant ClearStar, Inc. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 04/01/2024. (Allen, Arenda) |
Filing 13 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason Spak and Certification of Local Counsel Ronald Page, Jr. Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9424051. by ClearStar, Inc.. (Page, Ronald) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ClearStar, Inc.. (Page, Ronald) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint Defendant's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Jury Demand) by ClearStar, Inc..(Page, Ronald) |
Filing 10 ORDER re #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. It is hereby ORDERED that the Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Sterling Infosystems, Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant Sterling Infosystems, Inc. shall have up to and including April 10, 2024 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 3/14/2024. (Vpea) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John Willard Montgomery, Jr on behalf of Sterling Infosystems, Inc. (Montgomery, John) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sterling Infosystems, Inc.. (Montgomery, John) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Sterling Infosystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Montgomery, John) |
MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge. #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Vpea) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marquis Deshawn Francis ClearStar, Inc. served on 2/29/2024, answer due 3/21/2024 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Rotkis, Susan) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marquis Deshawn Francis Sterling Infosystems, Inc. served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/20/2024 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Rotkis, Susan) |
Filing 4 Two (2) Summonses Issued as to ClearStar, Inc., Sterling Infosystems, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons as to Defendant ClearStar, Inc. by Marquis Deshawn Francis. (Rotkis, Susan) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons as to Defendant Sterling Infosystems, Inc. by Marquis Deshawn Francis. (Rotkis, Susan) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9375069.), filed by Marquis Deshawn Francis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rotkis, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.