Creekmore v. Truist Bank
| LeaAnne Creekmore |
| Truist Bank |
| 2:2024cv00209 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Jamar K Walker |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question - Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference will be conducted remotely on 6/10/2024 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 5/21/2024. (bap, )
|
| Refer for 16(b) (mrees) |
| Filing 9 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Truist Bank. (Constine, David) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Truist Bank.(Constine, David) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File. IT IS ORDERED that Truist shall have until May 13, 2024, to plead or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 4/23/24. (mrees)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Leonard. #6 Consent MOTION for Extension for an Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings (mrees) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension for an Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Truist Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Henson, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Henson on behalf of Truist Bank (Henson, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David Edward Constine, III on behalf of Truist Bank (Constine, David) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Truist Bank, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by LeaAnne Creekmore. (Hernandez, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9442258.), filed by LeaAnne Creekmore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hernandez, Nathan) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Jamar K. Walker and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Creekmore v. Truist Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LeaAnne Creekmore | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Marc Hernandez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Truist Bank | |
| Represented By: | David Edward Constine, III |
| Represented By: | Andrew Henson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
