Taylor v. Clarke et al
Michael Sean Taylor |
Harold Clarke, Kevin Macoy, T. Green, Nurse Practitioner Rinek and Head of Sussex I State Prison Medical Staff |
2:2024cv00213 |
March 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Jamar K Walker |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (afar) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Sean Taylor. (afar) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT, Conditional filed against Harold Clarke, T. Green, Head of Sussex I State Prison Medical Staff, Kevin Macoy, Nurse Practitioner Rinek, filed by Michael Sean Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(afar) |
Filing 1 ORDER: In deference to the plaintiffs pro se status, the Clerk is DIRECTED to open a new civil action and to docket in that action a copy of (i) this Order; (ii) the plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 1; and (iii) the plaintiff's in forma pauperis application, ECF No. 7. Upon opening the new action, the Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to send the plaintiff an Acknowledgment of Receipt form providing the case caption and the case number for the new action. Once the new action is opened, the Court will enter an order regarding the next steps to be taken in this matter. Signed by District Judge Jamar K. Walker on 3/29/2024. (copy and documents mailed as directed 3/29/2024)(afar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.