Womble v. Bisignano
| William Monroe Womble |
| Frank Bisignano |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice |
| 2:2026cv00540 |
| June 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Jamar K Walker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-11034036.), filed by William Monroe Womble. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Decision Unfavorable, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goss, John) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Jamar K. Walker and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
| NOTICE: Social Security Case Service Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 USC 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CMECF) system notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia of the commencement of this action. Per Rule 3 the plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. No summons shall issue. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
