Rambus, Inc., et al v. Infineon, et al
Plaintiff: Rambus, Inc.
Defendant: Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Infineon Technologies, Inc., Infineon Technologies Holding North America Corp. and Infineon Technologies Corp.
Petitioner: Micron Technology, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP and American Lawyer Media, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2000cv00524
Filed: August 8, 2000
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
Presiding Judge: Robert E Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2005. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2005 Filing 1069 Submission of Exhibits Used by Rambus, Inc. During Unclean Hands Evidentiary Hearing (w/two boxes of Binders; 1-7 Documentary Binders Received; #8 Deposition Transcript Excerpts Binder) (jtho, )
July 21, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1068 ORDER the Final Pretrial Order (dkt #1067) is removed from seal and filed with the public record. Signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 7/20/05. Copies mailed and by facsimile(cgar, )
June 27, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1067 FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER (NUNC PRO TUNC FEB. 21, 2005). Signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/23/05. (Removed from sealed documents per Order entered 7/21/05 and placed in brown expandable)(cgar, ) Modified on 7/21/2005 to reflect Order - docket #1068 entered 7/21/05)(cgar, ).
May 6, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1054 ORDER granting 1008 Motion for Acces to Copies of Demonstrative Exhibits Used in Open Court (Docket No. 1008) . Signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on May 6, 2005. (copies mailed yes and by facsimile) (cgar, )
May 6, 2005 Filing 1053 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on May 6, 2005. (cgar, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 6/8/2005 (hgay, ).
April 21, 2005 Filing 1066 (SEALED)TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 15, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1065 (SEALED)TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 15, 2005 before Judge Robert E.Payne. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1064 (SEALED)TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 11, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1063 (SEALED) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 11, 2005 AT 10:10 a.m. before Judge Robert E. Payne. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1062 (SEALED) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 10, 2005 at 6:05 p.m. before Judge Robert E. Payne. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1061 (SEALED) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 10, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. (Volume 1) (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1060 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on March 1, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. Court Reporter: Josett F. Whalen, RMR-CRR. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1059 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 28, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. Court Reporter: Josett F. Whalen, RMR-CRR. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1058 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 24, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. Court Reporter: Josett F. Whalen, RMR-CRR. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1057 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 23, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. Court Reporter: Josett F. Whalen, RMR-CRR. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1056 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings (TRIAL VOLUME 2) held on February 22, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. Court Reporter: Josett F. Whalen, RMR-CRR. (cgar, )
April 21, 2005 Filing 1055 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings (TRIAL VOLUME 1) held on February 21, 2005 before Judge Robert E. Payne. Court Reporter: Josett F. Whalen, RMR-CRR. (cgar, )
March 25, 2005 Exhibits (Demonstrative Exhibits (1 set) from 2/4/05 hearing and Exhibits (1 set) used in Closing Argument during the Unclean Hands evidentiary hearing) received by Infineon ( PLACED UNDER SEAL ) (cgar) Modified on 03/25/2005
March 21, 2005 Case reopened (pending Hydix Motion) (cgar)
March 21, 2005 Filing 1052 STIPULATION of dismissal with prejudice (including any claims and counterclaims previously dismissed either voluntarily or involuntarily) (cgar)
March 21, 2005 Case closed (cgar)
March 17, 2005 Exhibits (orginally lodged 02/21/05) resubmitted from "unclean hands" hearing: Volumes 1-3 (marked "trial exhibits) and 1 black binder (marked "deposition testimony")on behalf of dft Infineon (cgar)
March 16, 2005 Filing 1051 TRANSCRIPT of status conference before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 03/02/05 (cgar)
March 4, 2005 Filing 1050 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 03/03/05 (cgar)
March 3, 2005 Filing 1049 NOTICE of Lodging of Demonstratives and Exhibits used during its Unclean Hands Closing Argument by Rambus, Inc.; (6 Black binders labeled "Exhibits" and 1 black binders (demonstrative) in 2 banker boxes) (cgar)
March 2, 2005 Filing 1048 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a Status Conference. Defendant's Motion To Dismiss the 17200 Claim Without Prejudice heard. Rambus's Motion to Dismiss the 17200 Claim With Prejudice heard. Arguments had. The Court will grant the Defendant's Motion and the 17200 Claim will be dismissed without prejudice. An Order will enter after the final judgment on other issues is entered. (snea)
March 1, 2005 Filing 1047 Minute entry: Payne, J., Josett Whalen, For The Record, Inc., Court Reporter. (1-800-921-5555). Closing Arguments had from Evidentiary Hearing on Spoliation/Unclean Hands. The Court ruled that Infineon has proved that Rambus had Unclean Hands and also proved the Spoliation issue. An Opinion will enter dismissing the Patent Infringement Claims. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Monopolization Claimheard; arguments had. Motion granted. (snea) Modified on 03/02/2005
March 1, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1046 ORDER Infineon's objections to trial exhibits designated by Rambus in connection with its defense to Infineon's monopolization counterclaim: PTX 7272; PTX 7275-7297; PTX 7300; PTX 7452-7438; PTX 7985; and PTX 8428 are SUSTAINED ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/1/05] (cgar)
March 1, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1045 ORDER denying [1029-1] motion for immediate discovery regaring the "JRA" Group and Regarding Infineon's failure to provide discovery regarding the JRA Group and its analysis of Rambus patents by Rambus, Inc. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/1/05] (cgar)
March 1, 2005 Filing 1044 (CORRECTED VERSION) PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT regarding Rambus' Unclean Hands and Spoliation of Evidence Infineon (cgar)
March 1, 2005 Status Conference set at 2:00 3/2/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 28, 2005 Filing 1043 Minute entry: Payne, J., Josett Whalen, For the Record, Inc., Court Reporter (1-800-921-5555). Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a hearing on Pre-Trial Matters. The Court ruled on the admission of certain exhibits at trial. See transcript for details. Arguments had on Rambus' Motion for Immediate Discovery re: "JRA Group". Motion denied. Hynick's Motion For Access to Copies of the Parties' Demonstrative Exhibits to be Used in Open Court submitted to the Court on the briefs filed by the parties. (snea) Modified on 03/01/2005
February 28, 2005 Filing 1042 Sur-Reply by Infineon In Opposition to Rambus' Offer of Proof on Specialty DRAM Products (kste)
February 28, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1041 ORDER granting [1037-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Rambus' Offer of Proof on Specialty Dram Products, Clerk is directed to file Infineon's Sur-Reply in Opposition to Rambus' Offer of Proof on Specialty DRAM Products ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne; Copies Mailed: yes, and faxed [EOD Date: 2/28/05] (kste)
February 28, 2005 Filing 1040 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT with Respect to Infineon's Unclean Hands Defense by Rambus (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 28, 2005 Filing 1039 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [1029-1] motion for immediate discovery regaring the "JRA" Group and Regarding Infineon's failure to provide discovery regarding the JRA Group and its analysis of Rambus patents (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 28, 2005 Filing 1038 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT Regarding Ramubs' Unclean Hands and Spoliation of Evidence by Infineon (cgar)
February 28, 2005 Filing 1037 MOTION by Infineon for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Rambus' Offer of Proof on Specialty Dram Products (Sur-Reply Recv'd and placed on left) (cgar)
February 25, 2005 Filing 1036 RESPONSE by Infineon to [1029-1] motion for immediate discovery regaring the "JRA" Group and Regarding Infineon's failure to provide discovery regarding the JRA Group and its analysis of Rambus patents (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 25, 2005 Filing 1035 Reply Memorandum to [1018-1 FILED UNDER SEAL] of Ramubs Inc. Regarding Offer of Proof in Support of Defense to Infineon's Monopolization Claim by Rambus (cgar)
February 25, 2005 Filing 1034 TRANSCRIPT of conference before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 02/18/05 (cgar)
February 25, 2005 Filing 1033 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 02/17/05 (cgar)
February 25, 2005 Oral Argument Hearing as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware, Howrey Simon Arnold set 4:00 2/28/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 25, 2005 Oral Argument Hearing as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware, Howrey Simon Arnold set 9:00 3/1/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 25, 2005 Jury Trial set at 10:30 3/2/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 24, 2005 Filing 1032 Minute entry: Payne, J., Josett Whalen, For the Record, Inc., Court Reporter. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for Evidentiary Hearing Day 4. Plaintiff adduced evidence; rested. The Court will hear closing arguments on Tuesday, March 1, 2005 beginning at 9:00 a.m. and Jury Selection will begin at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 2, 2005. (snea) Modified on 02/25/2005
February 24, 2005 Filing 1031 NOTICE of Filing of Special Master Order by Rambus, Inc. (CORRECTED VERSION) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 03/08/2005
February 24, 2005 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [1028-1] motion by Infineon for John Caviness O'Quinn to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 77135 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 23, 2005 Filing 1028 MOTION by Infineon for John Caviness O'Quinn to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 77135 (cgar)
February 23, 2005 Filing 1027 Minute entry:EVIDENTIARY HEARING : Day 3. Payne, J., Josett Whalen, Court Reporter,( For the Record, Inc. 1-800-921-5555) Parties by counsel. Defendant adduced evidence; rested. Court adjourned at 8:00 p.m. to return tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. for further proceedings. Court time: 5 hrs. 30 mins. (snea) Modified on 02/24/2005
February 23, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1026 ORDER granting [1021-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Motion for Immediate Discovery RE: JRA Group and Re: Infineon's Failure to Provide Discovery Re: JRA Group and its Anaylsis of Rambus Patents; it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall the file motion nunc pro tunc 2/22/05; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/23/05] (thom)
February 23, 2005 Filing 1025 REPLY by Hynix to response to [1008-1] motion for access to copies of demonstrative exhibits used in open court (kste)
February 22, 2005 Filing 1030 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [1029-1] motion for immediate discovery regaring the "JRA" Group and Regarding Infineon's failure to provide discovery regarding the JRA Group and its analysis of Rambus patents (Declaration of Steven M. Perry in Support Attached) (cgar)
February 22, 2005 Filing 1029 MOTION for immediate discovery regaring the "JRA" Group and Regarding Infineon's failure to provide discovery regarding the JRA Group and its analysis of Rambus patents by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 22, 2005 Filing 1024 Minute entry: EVIDENTIARY HEARING: Day 2. Payne, J., Josset Whalen, Court Reporter,For the Record, Inc., (1-800-921-5555). Parties by counsel. Defendant continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess. Defendant continued to adduce evidence. Arguments had by counsel on the admission of certain depositions into evidence. Matter taken under advisement by the Court. Court adjourned at 7:30 p.m. to return tomorrow at 2:00 p.m. for further proceedings. Court Time: 8 hrs. 10 mins. (snea) Modified on 02/23/2005
February 22, 2005 Filing 1023 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [1008-1] motion for access to copies of demonstrative exhibits used in open court by Hynix (wtuc)
February 22, 2005 Filing 1022 Response in Opposition to Rambus's Offer of Proof Seeking to Admit Exhibits Re: to RLDRAM and Other Specialty DRAM Products by Infineon (thom)
February 22, 2005 Filing 1021 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Motion for Immediate Discovery RE: JRA Group and Re: Infineon's Failure to Provide Discovery Re: JRA Group and its Anaylsis of Rambus Patents (Motion w/Memo in Support for Immediate Discovery rec'd only and placed on left pending ruling by Court) (thom) Modified on 02/22/2005
February 22, 2005 Evidentiary Hearing set at 2:00 2/23/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 21, 2005 (RETURNED TO COUNSEL) Exhibits received by Infineon (6 volumes in 1 set) RESUBMITTED 03-17/05 (thom) Modified on 03/18/2005
February 21, 2005 (RETURNED TO COUNSEL) Exhibits received by Rambus, Inc. (8 volumes in 4 sets) (RESUBMITTED 03/03/05) (thom) Modified on 03/18/2005
February 21, 2005 Filing 1020 Minute entry: Payne, J., Josett Whalen, Court Reporter, For the Record, Inc. (1-800-921-5555). Parties by counsel. Matter came on for Day 1 of an Evidentiary Hearing re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Motion to Close Hearing denied for the reasons previously stated on the record. Defendant adduced evidence. Court adjourned and the Evidentiary Hearing will continue beginning at 9:30 a.m. tomorrow morning. (snea) Modified on 02/22/2005
February 21, 2005 Evidentiary Hearing set at 9:30 2/22/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 18, 2005 Filing 1019 MOTION by Gray Cary Ware for James Patrick Ulwick to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 77073 (cgar)
February 18, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1017 ORDER the juror information is confidential and shall only be viewed by (see Order for list of names); Counsel may share non-identifying juror information w/ a client representative and jury consultant, both must agree not to share it with any other person on pain of contempt of court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 2/18/05] (cgar)
February 18, 2005 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [1019-1] motion by Gray Cary Ware (on behalf of witness Sean Cunningham, Esquire) for James Patrick Ulwick to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 77073 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 17, 2005 Filing 1018 Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Rambus, Inc. Regarding Offer of Proof in Support of Defense to Infineon's Monoplization Claim filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 16, 2005 Filing 1016 TRANSCRIPT before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 02/07/05 (cgar) Modified on 02/17/2005
February 16, 2005 Evidentiary Hearing set at 2:00 2/21/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 15, 2005 Filing 1015 Discovery Designation filed by Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL) (thom) Modified on 02/17/2005
February 15, 2005 Filing 1014 Discovery Designations (Summaries of Deposition) filed by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 15, 2005 Filing 1013 Stipulation Concerning the use of Recorded sworn Testimony at trial filed by Rambus and Infineon (cgar)
February 14, 2005 Filing 1012 Joint Submission Regarding Juror Questionnaire by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., defendant Infineon (khan)
February 14, 2005 Filing 1011 Memorandum by Infineon Regarding Rambus' Attempt to Offer the FTC Trial Testimony of Gordon Kelley with Respect to PTX 7621 (khan)
February 14, 2005 Filing 1010 Brief by Rambus, Inc. Regarding Admissibility of Evidence about the JEDEC Patent Policy and About Rambus's Non-Disclosure of its Patent Applications (khan)
February 14, 2005 Filing 1009 TRANSCRIPT of the Motion to Dismiss (2ND DAY) for date of 02/05/05 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 11, 2005 Filing 1008 MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Hynix for access to copies of demonstrative exhibits used in open court (cgar)
February 11, 2005 Filing 1007 Reply (Memorandum of Law) by Rambus, Inc. to [1005-1] by Infineon (Response to the Court's Request for further briefing with regard to a Court's Authority to Compel a person to appeal at trial) (cgar)
February 10, 2005 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware, Howrey Simon Arnold held (snea)
February 9, 2005 Filing 1006 TRANSCRIPT of Motion to Dismiss before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 02/04/05 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 9, 2005 Filing 1005 Response (memorandum of law) by Infineon to [998-1] Joint Submission Regarding a Trial Plan by Infineon Inc., and Rambus, Inc., regarding Rambus'attempt to introduce the prior recorded testimony of its Officers, Directors, and Managing Agents (kste)
February 7, 2005 Filing 1004 Minute entry: Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a Status Conference regarding trial of the case. Parties made statements to the Court. (snea)
February 7, 2005 Filing 1003 NOTICE of Lodging Demonstratives and Evidence Presented by Rambus, Inc. at 2/4-2/5/05 Hearing. (thom)
February 7, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 1002 ORDER denying [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct because there remain genuine issues of material facts that must be resolved by the trier of fact as to the unclean hands defense; to the extent the Motion seeks sanctions of dismissal or, alternatively, adverse inferences for spoliation of evidence, the Motion remains under advisement ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 2/7/05] (cgar)
February 7, 2005 Status Conference set at 4:30 2/7/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
February 5, 2005 Filing 1001 Minute entry:Payne, J., Krista Liscio, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a Contination of the hearing on Defenant's Motion to Dismiss Rambus' Patent Infringement Claims based on Rambus' Willful Destruction of Evidence and Other Litigation Misconduct. Arguments had. Motion taken under advisement. (snea)
February 4, 2005 Filing 1000 Minute entry: Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a hearing on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Rambus' Patent Infringement Claims based on Rambus's Willful Destruction of Evidence and Other Litigation Misconduct. Arguments had. Hearing continued and further arguments will be had beginning at 9:00 a.m. on 2/5/5. (snea)
February 4, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 999 ORDER the Court will not cosider the documents submitted by the Pltf as exhibits to Rambus' Memorandum in Opposition to Infineon's Motion to Dismiss Rambus' Patent Infringement Claims (dkt #984) for the Court's in camera review and the Pltf is ORDERED to retrieve the exhibits from the Court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 2/3/05 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/4/05] (cgar) Modified on 02/04/2005
February 4, 2005 Final Pre-Trial Conference continued at 9:00 2/11/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (lmcd)
February 3, 2005 Filing 998 Joint Submission Regarding Trial Plan filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., defendant Infineon (kste)
February 1, 2005 Filing 997 PUBLIC (REDACTED) VERSION REPLY by Infineon to response to [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct (cgar)
January 31, 2005 Filing 996 PUBLIC (REDACTED) VERSION RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct (cgar)
January 28, 2005 Deadline updated; reset Jury Trial for 9:30 2/22/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (rpiz)
January 26, 2005 Filing 995 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 1/26/5 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
January 24, 2005 Filing 994 REPLY by Infineon to response to [968-1] motion to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A,B,D,F,H,I,S,T placed in brown expandable) (Exhibts C,E,G,J,K-R, U,V SEALED) (cgar)
January 24, 2005 Jury Trial set at 9:30 3/1/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
January 24, 2005 Jury Trial set at 9:30 3/7/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
January 21, 2005 Filing 993 NOTICE of Errata to Memorandum in Opposition to Infineon's Motion to Dismiss Rambus's Patent Infringement Claims and Appendix by Rambus, Inc. FILED UNDER SEAL (cgar)
January 21, 2005 Filing 992 (CORRECTED) RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct FILED UNDER SEAL (cgar)
January 21, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 991 ORDER granting [990-1] motion to exceed page limit by Infineon ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 1/21/05] (cgar)
January 21, 2005 Filing 990 MOTION to exceed page limit by Infineon (Sketch order presented) (cgar)
January 21, 2005 Jury Trial set at 9:30 3/7/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
January 20, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 989 ORDER granting [964-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 1/20/05] (cgar)
January 20, 2005 Filing 988 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile (cgar)
January 19, 2005 Filing 987 Response by Rambus, Inc. to the Court's 01/18/05 invitation to make a further filing w/declarations of Peter A. Detre and Gregory P. Stone (w/Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Infineon's Motion to Dismiss Rambus' Patent Infringement Claims) (cgar) Modified on 01/20/2005
January 18, 2005 Filing 986 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 1/18/05 before The Hon. Robert E. Payne (Conference Call) (placed in brown expanable) (scoo)
January 18, 2005 Filing 985 (PUBLIC) Corrected MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon (scoo)
January 14, 2005 Filing 984 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct by Infineon (w/ Declaration of Peter A. Detre and David M. Rhoads and 5 banker boxes of exhibits ALL FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
January 14, 2005 Filing 983 NOTICE of Lodging Privileged Exhibits by Rambus (cgar)
January 14, 2005 Filing 982 NOTICE of Lodging Privileged document by Rambus (cgar)
January 14, 2005 Filing 981 NOTICE of further production of documents by Rambus (cgar)
January 13, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 980 ORDER granting [977-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for leave to exceed the 30 page limit for the brief it will file on Friday, January 14, 2005 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and faxed [EOD Date: 1/13/05] (kste)
January 12, 2005 Filing 979 CORRECTED MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [968-1] motion to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct Infineon (w/exhibits 13, 19, 34,66,72,80,134) FILED UNDER SEAL (cgar)
January 12, 2005 Filing 978 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [977-1] motion for leave to exceed page limit (Order presented) (cgar)
January 12, 2005 Filing 977 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for leave to exceed page limit (cgar)
January 10, 2005 Oral Argument Hearing as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware, Howrey Simon Arnold set 1:00 2/4/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
January 6, 2005 Jury Trial set at 9:30 2/22/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
January 6, 2005 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware, Howrey Simon Arnold set 9:00 2/10/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
December 29, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 976 STIPULATED ORDER Concerning Pretrial Dates: parties shall serve additional testimony designations, and their rebuttal exhibit lists by December 24, 2004; Rambus shall file and serve its brief in opposition to Infineon's brief regarding appropriate relief for Rambus's alleged litigation misconduct by January 14, 2005; Parties shall serve objections to trial exhibits, testimony designations, and rebuttal/fairness testimony designations by January 21, 2005; Infineon shall file and serve its reply brief regarding appropiate relief for Rambus's alleged litigation misconduct by January 24, 2005; Parties shall serve their objections to rebuttal/fairness testimony designations by January 28, 2005; Parties shall meet and confer on objections to exhibits and designated testimony by January 31, 2005; Proposed Final Pretrial Order, w/exhibits will be served and filed on February 2, 2005; Court will hear argument on Infineon's motion for relief for Rambus's alleged litigation misconduct at 1:00 p.m. on February 4, 2005; Final Pretrial Conference will be held on February 10 and 11, 2005; Conformed sets of discovery designations, testimony designations and summaries of designated deposition testimony will be served and filed on February 15, 2005; Jury selection and, thereafter, trial will commence on February 22, 2005 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/29/04] (kste)
December 27, 2004 Filing 975 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. to response to [964-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket (FILED UNDER SEAL) (kste)
December 21, 2004 Filing 974 RESPONSE (Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [964-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket (FILED UNDER SEAL) (kste)
December 20, 2004 Filing 973 MEMORANDUM (PUBLIC [REDACTED] VERSION) by Infineon, Infineon in support of [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct (Sealed Version filed 12/13/04) (cgar)
December 17, 2004 Filing 972 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 11/30/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
December 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 971 ORDER granting [832-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Larry M. Boyle, Chief Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, District of Idaho, U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building, 500 W. Fort Street, Box 039, Boise, Idaho 83724 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 12/15/04] (khan)
December 15, 2004 Filing 970 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (khan)
December 13, 2004 Filing 969 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [968-1] motion by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS #1-151 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
December 13, 2004 Filing 968 MOTION by Infineon to Dismiss Rambus' patent infringement claims based on Rambus' willful destruction of evidence and other litigation misconduct (cgar)
December 13, 2004 Filing 967 TRANSCRIPT for date of December 3, 2004 hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (placed in brown expandable) (thom)
December 10, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 966 ORDER granting [962-1] motion by Infineon to exceed page limit ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 12/10/04] (cgar)
December 10, 2004 Filing 965 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [964-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket (FILED UNDER SEAL W/EXHIBITS A-E) (cgar)
December 10, 2004 Filing 964 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket (cgar)
December 10, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 963 ORDER granting [960-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Motion to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 12/10/04] (cgar)
December 10, 2004 Filing 962 MOTION by Infineon to exceed page limit (Sketch Order presented) (cgar)
December 10, 2004 Filing 961 Statement of Counsel in Support of Infineon's Motion to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents forwarded to BDMarket (cgar)
December 10, 2004 Filing 960 MOTION by Infineon for Leave to File Motion to Compel Rambus to Produce Documents Forwarded to BDMarket (Motion RECV'D and placed on left and MemSup (w/exhibits A-E) RECV'D and placed in seal box) (cgar)
December 8, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 959 ORDER that counsel for Gray Cary shall pick up documents from chambers of Judge Robert E. Payne, which were ordered to be produced to the Court for in camera review (Dkt. #933); counsel for Howery Simon shall pick up documents from chambers of Judge Robert E. Payne which were ordered to be produced to court for in camera review (Dkt. #932); (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile) [EOD Date: 12/8/04] (thom)
December 7, 2004 Filing 958 TRANSCRIPT before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 12/06/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
December 7, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 957 Stipulated Order Concerning Final Pretrial Order Date the parties exchange respective sections of the proposed FPO and serve their final exhibit lists by 12/17/04, parties exchange rebuttal lists by 12/29/04 parties serve their objections to trial exhibits by 01/12/05 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/7/04] (cgar)
December 7, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 956 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [918-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 12/06/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 12/7/04] (cgar)
December 7, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 955 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [911-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce documents in response to subpoena ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 12/06/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 12/7/04] (cgar) Modified on 12/07/2004
December 7, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 954 ORDER denied as moot [929-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Certain Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 12/06/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/7/04] (cgar) Modified on 12/07/2004
December 3, 2004 Filing 953 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a hearing on Defendant's Motions To Compel. Argumens had. Motions granted in part denied in part. See transcript of hearing for specific details. (snea)
December 3, 2004 Filing 952 NOTICE of by Infineon Withdrawing [929-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Certain Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (cgar)
November 30, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 951 ORDER granting [945-1] motion by Howrey Simon Arnold to File Documents Contained in its Privilege Log Under Seal ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/30/04] (cgar)
November 30, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [948-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Tamerlin Jane Godley to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 76004 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
November 29, 2004 Filing 950 REPLY by Infineon to response to [911-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce documents in response to (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (EXHIBITS 4-13, 15-20 & 23 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 12/03/2004
November 29, 2004 Filing 949 REPLY by Infineon to response to [918-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena (Exhibits 1-2 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 29, 2004 Filing 948 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Tamerlin Jane Godley to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 76004 (cgar)
November 24, 2004 Filing 947 Howrey's NOTICE of Lodging Privileged Documents and Notice of Filing Second Motion to File Documents Contained in its Privilege Log Under Seal (khan)
November 24, 2004 Filing 946 MEMORANDUM by Howrey Simon Arnold in support of [945-1] second motion by Howrey Simon Arnold to File Documents Contained in its Privilege Log Under Seal (Order received and placed on left) (khan) Modified on 11/24/2004
November 24, 2004 Filing 945 SECOND MOTION by Howrey Simon Arnold to File Documents Contained in its Privilege Log Under Seal (Certificate contained motion and mem. in support attached to mem in support) (khan) Modified on 11/24/2004
November 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 944 ORDER granting [940-1] motion by Gray Cary Ware to Seal privileged documents that are subject to Infinenon's Motion to Compel Gray Cary to Produce Docs in response to Subpoena (Dkt. 911) and which Gray Cary Ware has lodged with the Court for its in camera review be and hereby are SEALED until further order of this Court; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and facsimile [EOD Date: 11/24/04] (thom)
November 23, 2004 Filing 943 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Gray Cary Ware to [911-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce in response to subpoena (exhibits placed in brown expandable) (thom) Modified on 11/24/2004
November 23, 2004 Filing 942 NOTICE of Lodging Privilege Documents and Motion to Seal by Gray Cary Ware (thom)
November 23, 2004 Filing 941 MEMORANDUM by Gray Cary Ware in support of [940-1] motion to Seal privileged documents that are subject to Infinenon's Motion to Compel Gray Cary to Docs in response to Subpoena (thom)
November 23, 2004 Filing 940 MOTION by Gray Cary Ware to Seal privileged documents that are subject to Infinenon's Motion to Compel Gray Cary to Produce Docs in response to Subpoena (Dkt. 911) (thom)
November 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 939 ORDER allowing Howrey Simon Arnold & White to submit sealed documents on its privilege list for in camera review. (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 11/23/04] (thom)
November 23, 2004 Filing 938 MEMORANDUM by Howrey Simon Arnold in support of Howrey's Motion (not filed w/Court) to File Documents Contained in Its Privilege Log Under Seal (thom)
November 23, 2004 Filing 937 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Howrey Simon Arnold to [918-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena (thom)
November 23, 2004 Filing 936 TRANSCRIPT of telephone conference (11:15 a.m.) before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 11/19/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 23, 2004 Filing 935 TRANSCRIPT of hearing (9:30 a.m.) on motion to quash subpoena issued to Gary Cary before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 11/19/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 11/23/2004
November 23, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware [929-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Certain Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log set at 10:30 12/3/04, [918-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena set at 10:30 12/3/04, [914-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP to produce documents pursuant to a subpoena set at 10:30 12/3/04, [911-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce documents in response to subpoena set at 10:30 12/3/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
November 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 934 ORDER the court reporter is directed to deliver a copy of the transcript of the hearing on Gray Cary Ware & Friedenrich LLP's Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued on Behalf of Infineon Technologies AS (dkt #898) held on 11/19/04 to the Clerk of this Court, who shall forward to the Honorable Ruben B. Brooks, U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/19/04] (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 933 ORDER denying [898-1] motion by Gray Cary Ware to Quash Subpoena Issued on behalf of Infineon;Gray Cary Ware & Friedenrich LLP shall deliver the approximately 261 disputed documents..to the chambers of Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/23/04; the deposition of the designee shall take place in the courthouse for the U. S. District Court of Virginia on 12/07/04 at 9:00 a.m. to be presided over by Judge Robert E. Payne (see Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile and to The Honorable Ruben B. Brooks, U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, 940 Front Street, San Diego, CA 92101 [EOD Date: 11/19/04] (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 932 ORDER Howery Simon Arnold & White LLP shall deliver the approximately 35 disputed documents...to the chambers of Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/23/04;the deposition of the designee of Howery Simon Arnold & White LLp shall take place in the courthouse for the U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Virginia on 12/07/04 at 2:00 p.m. to be presided over by Judge Robert E. Payne (see Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 11/19/04] (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Filing 931 Statement of Counsel in Support of Motion to Compel Production of Certain Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log by defendant Infineon (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Filing 930 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [929-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Certain Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Filing 929 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Production of Certain Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 928 ORDER granting [926-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Motion to Compel Steinberg Documents ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 11/19/04] (cgar)
November 19, 2004 Filing 927 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on Movant's, Gray Cary, Motion to Quash Subpoena. Arguments had. For the reasons stated on the record the motion is demoed. Order to enter. (snea)
November 18, 2004 Filing 926 MOTION by Infineon for Leave to File Motion to Compel Steinberg Documents (Motion, MemSup (TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL) and Statement of Counsel RECV'D only) (cgar)
November 18, 2004 Filing 925 TRANSCRIPT of ocnference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 11/17/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 924 ORDER that Gray Ware & Friedenrich shall file its response to Infineon's Motion to Compel by 11/23/04, Howery Simon Arnold & White shall file its response to Infineon's Motion to Compel by 11/23/04, Infineon shall file replies to both by 11/29/04, a hearing is set for 12/3/04 at 10:30 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/17/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and fax [EOD Date: 11/18/04] (scoo) Modified on 11/18/2004
November 18, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [923-1] motion by Gray Cary Ware for Gregory Scott Williams to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50 Receipt # 75870 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 11/17/04) Copies Mailed: y (khan)
November 16, 2004 Filing 923 MOTION by Gray Cary Ware for Gregory Scott Williams to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50 Receipt # 75870 (khan)
November 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 922 Stipulated Order the documents listed on Attachment A (FILED UNDER SEAL) to this Stipulated Order shall be provided by Rambus to Infineon and shall be disclosed only to members of the Infineon's trial team on an "Outside Counsel Only" as defined by the Protective Order entered herein (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/15/04] (cgar)
November 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 921 ORDER to the extent that the Memorandum of Rambus Regarding Courts Sealed Memorandum Opinions Filed May 18, 2004 (dkt #872) calls for a decision at this time, it is unnecessary to render such a decision because the supplemental briefing has rendered the issue moot, and therefore the Memorandum is DENIED AS MOOT ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 11/15/04] (cgar)
November 15, 2004 Filing 920 Statement of Counsel in support of defendant Infineon's [918-1] motion to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena (cgar)
November 15, 2004 Filing 919 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [918-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena (Exhibits A-F placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 15, 2004 Filing 918 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnorld & White LLP to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena (cgar)
November 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 917 ORDER granting [914-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP to produce documents pursuant to a subpoena ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 11/15/04] (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Filing 916 TRANSCRIPT of conference call (4:00 p.m.) before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 11/4/4 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Filing 915 REPLY by Gray Cary Ware to response to [898-1] motion by Gray Cary Ware to Quash Subpoena Issued on behalf of Infineon (Exhibits 1-3 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Filing 914 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP to produce documents pursuant to a subpoena (Motion to Compel and Memorandum w/exhibits and Statement of Counsel placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Filing 913 Statement of Counsel in support of Infineon's Motion to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce documents in respose to subpoena filed by defendant Infineon (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Filing 912 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [911-1] motion to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce documents in response to (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Filing 911 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP to produce documents in response to subpoena (cgar)
November 12, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 910 ORDER granting [907-1] motion by Infineon Inc. for Leave to File Motion to Compel Gray Cary to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 11/10/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 11/12/04] (cgar) Modified on 11/12/2004
November 9, 2004 Filing 909 Reply Memorandum by Infineon Re: Documents and Testimony that Infineon Seeks from Gray Cary Ware and Howrey Simon Arnold to [903-1] Response by Rambus, Inc. (w/Exhibits B,C, D,I,J,K placed UNDER SEAL) (all other exhibits attached) (thom)
November 9, 2004 Filing 908 RESPONSE by Infineon to [898-1] motion to Quash Subpoena Issued on behalf of Infineon by Gray Cary Ware (w/Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (thom)
November 9, 2004 Filing 907 MOTION by Infineon Inc. for Leave to File Motion to Compel Gray Cary to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena (Motion to Compel, Memorandum in Support, Exhibits in Support of Motion (in brown expandable) and Statement of Counsel in Support - PLACED ON LEFT SIDE OF FILE pending ruling by Court) (w/sketch Proposed Order) (thom)
November 9, 2004 Filing 906 Supplemental Reply Memorandum Re: Sealed Memorandum Opinions Filed 5/18/04 by Rambus, Inc. (thom)
November 9, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 905 Stipulated Order mooting [891-1] motion by Hynix to Intervene and to Modify 09/30/04 Stipulated Order and 10/01/04 Order; Hynix's motion to intervene and for modification of this Court's orders is deemed moot and hereby WITHDRAWN (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/9/04] (cgar)
November 5, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 904 STIPULATED ORDER concerning briefing schedule for Hynix Semiconductor, Inc.'s Motion to Intervene, Rambus file its memorandum in opposition to Hynix's motion to intervene on Monday, Nov. 8, 2004 and serve local counsel by hand and Hynix''s counsel in California by facsimile, and Hynix shall file and serve its reply brief in support of its motion to intervene on 11/12/04 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and fascimile [EOD Date: 11/5/04] (cgar)
November 5, 2004 Filing 903 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [896-1] Supplemental discovery plan regarding documents and testimony that Infineon seeks from Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP and Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP by Infineon (cgar)
November 5, 2004 Filing 902 Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Sealed Memorandum Opinions Filed May 18, 2004 filed by defendant Infineon (cgar)
November 5, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 901 ORDER the hearing on Gray Cary Ware & Friedenrich LLP's Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued on Behalf of Infineon shall be held on 11/19/04 at 9:30 am ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/5/04] (cgar)
November 5, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Hynix, Gray Cary Ware [898-1] motion by Gray Cary Ware to Quash Subpoena Issued on behalf of Infineon set at 9:30 11/19/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
November 4, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 900 ORDER (Stipulated Order Concerning Pretrial Dates) that the Court has continued the Final Pretrial Conference to January 27-28, 2005, and pretrial dates shall be adjusted; Trial will commence on February 14, 2004 (See Order for details)( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/4/04] (cmcc)
November 3, 2004 Filing 899 MEMORANDUM by Gray Cary Ware in support of [898-1] motion to Quash Subpoena Issued on behalf of Infineon (Exhibits A-B16 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 3, 2004 Filing 898 MOTION by Gray Cary Ware to Quash Subpoena Issued on behalf of Infineon (cgar)
October 29, 2004 Filing 897 Supplemental Memorandum regarding sealed memorandum opinions filed May 18, 2004 filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
October 29, 2004 Filing 896 Supplemental Discovery Plan Regarding the Documents and Testimony that Infineon seeks from Gray Cary Ware & Frieidenrich LLP and Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP (Exhibits 12 & 13 filed under SEAL) (Exhibits 1-22 (w/o exhibits 12 & 13) placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
October 27, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 894 ORDER that plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief on issue of the Court's sealed memorandum opinions by 10/29/04; the deft shall file a response by 11/5/04 and the plaintiff shall file a Reply by 11/9/04; the deft shall file a memorandum outlining the scope of discovery that deft intends to seek from the law firms of Gray Cary and Howery Simon Arnold & White by 10/29/04; the plaintiff shall file a response by 11/5/04 and deft shall file a response by 11/5/04 and the deft shall file a reply by 11/9/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/26/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/27/04] (thom)
October 26, 2004 Filing 893 TRANSCRIPT of Conference Call Before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for dates of October 25, 2004, placed in brown expandable (khan) Modified on 10/27/2004
October 25, 2004 Filing 895 USCA Federal Circuit Order the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied; the motion for leave to file a reply is granted (cgar)
October 25, 2004 Filing 892 MEMORANDUM by Hynix in support of [891-1] motion Intervene and to Modify 09/30/04 Stipulated Order and 10/01/04 Order (exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 10/26/2004
October 25, 2004 Filing 891 MOTION by Hynix to Intervene and to Modify 09/30/04 Stipulated Order and 10/01/04 Order (cgar) Modified on 10/26/2004
October 25, 2004 Filing 890 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 10/20/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
October 25, 2004 Filing 889 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 10/18/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 10/25/2004
October 21, 2004 Filing 888 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 10/13/04 (cgar)
October 21, 2004 Filing 887 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 10/08/04 (cgar)
October 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 886 ORDER that the Jury Trial shall be continued until 2/14/05 at 9:30 a.m., with jury selection to begin on 2/10/05, the Final Pretrial Conference shall be set for 1/27/05 and 1/28/05 at 9:00 a.m., (see order for further deadlines) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/18/04) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/19/04] (scoo) Modified on 10/19/2004
October 19, 2004 Jury Trial set at 9:30 2/10/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 19, 2004 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. set 9:00 1/27/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 15, 2004 Filing 885 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [715-1] order regarding sealed memorandum opinions (cgar)
October 15, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [883-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Hojoon Hwang to appear pro hac vice; Filing Fee Paid $ 50 Receipt # 75436 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 10/14/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
October 14, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 884 Stipulated Order Rambus shall serve on Infineon by 10/22/04 revised descriptions for the individual documents contained within Rambus' current privilege log entry nos. 4649, 4652, 4653, 4654, 4655 (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 10/12/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/14/04] (cgar)
October 12, 2004 Filing 883 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Hojoon Hwang to appear pro hac vice; Filing Fee Paid $ 50 Receipt # 75436 (khan)
October 12, 2004 Filing 882 Response (in opposition) by Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. to [872-1] Rambus, Inc.'s Memorandum Regarding Court's Sealed Memorandum Opinions Filed 5/18/04 (khan)
October 7, 2004 Filing 881 TRANSCRIPT of motions before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 09/27/04 (brown expandable) (cgar)
October 6, 2004 Filing 880 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for dates of 10/05/04 (cgar)
October 6, 2004 Filing 879 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 10/01/04 (cgar)
October 6, 2004 Filing 878 RESPONSE to [859-1] order by Federal Trade Commission, filed pursuant to Order entered October 5, 2004 (cmcc)
October 6, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 877 ORDER By Order entered September 13, 2004, the Court requested the Federal Trade Commission to take certain action; by Order entered October 1, 2004, the Federal Trade Commission responded to said action and the response of the Federal Trade Commission is attached hereto and shall be filed in the record of these proceedings along with this Order ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on October 5, 2004 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/6/04] (cmcc)
October 5, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 876 ORDER discovery plan proceed forthwith as outlined in the Discovery Plan; the proposed briefing schedule is approved and the hearing shall be held at 2:00 p.m., 11/09/04...five (5) calendar days notice shall be considered a reasonable period for such non-parties to respond to document production and deposition requests or subpoenas (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 10/04/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 10/5/04] (cgar)
October 5, 2004 Hearing Deadline as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. set 2:00 11/9/04 Hearing on Spoliation Discovery before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 4, 2004 Filing 875 Memorandum by Rambus regarding depositions to be conducted following the Court's May 18, 2004 Orders (cgar)
October 1, 2004 Filing 874 Proposed DISCOVERY PLAN pursuant to the Court's May 18, 2004 Orders by Infineon (cgar)
October 1, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 873 ORDER the Clerk shall release to counsel for Infineon the Memorandum Opinions (dkt#s 712 & 715), which counsel for Infineon shall receive under the terms of the Stipulated Order (dkt# 871) entered on 09/30/04...Infineon shall be permitted to file a timely response to the Memorandum of Rambus regarding Court's Sealed Memorandum Opinions filed May 18, 2004 and Rambus shall file a timely reply brief respecting further treatment of Dkt# 712 & 715 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/4/04] (cgar)
September 30, 2004 Filing 872 Memorandum filed by plaintiff Rambus regarding Court's Sealed Memorandum Opinions Filed May 18, 2004 (cgar)
September 30, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 871 Stipulated Order (see Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 9/29/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 9/30/04] (cgar)
September 29, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 870 ORDER denying [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus, Inc., denying [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter, denying [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 9/28/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 9/29/04] (cgar)
September 29, 2004 Filing 869 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 9/28/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar) Modified on 09/29/2004
September 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 867 ORDER denying [850-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 9/28/04] (cgar)
September 27, 2004 Filing 868 Minute entry: Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a hearing on Motions in Limine. Arguments had on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine To Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms Memory Device and Sychronous Memory Denice. Motion denied. Arguments had on Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Third Party Documents heard. Motion taken under advisement by the Court. (snea)
September 24, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 866 Stipulated Order concerning prertail dates (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 9/24/04] (cgar)
September 24, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [832-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents set at 1:30 9/27/04, [850-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" set at 1:30 9/27/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
September 24, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [864-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon for Richard Michael Koehl to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 75207 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
September 23, 2004 Motion hearing [850-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" set at 10:00 9/27/04, [832-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents set at 10:00 9/27/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (lmcd)
September 21, 2004 Filing 865 USCA Order (Federal Circuit) upon consideration, it is ORDERED that Rambus's petition for panel rehearing is denied; Rambus's petition for rehearing en banc will be circulated to the court; (thom)
September 21, 2004 Filing 864 MOTION by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon for Richard Michael Koehl to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 75207 (thom)
September 17, 2004 Filing 863 NOTICE of Attorney Change of Address by Rambus, Inc. (Peter A. Detre of MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP) (cgar)
September 16, 2004 Jury Trial set at 9:30 11/15/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
September 16, 2004 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. set 9:00 10/20/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
September 15, 2004 Filing 862 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 09/14/04 (cgar)
September 15, 2004 Filing 861 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 09/13/04 (cgar)
September 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 860 ORDER that the Jury Trial in this matter shall be continued until November 15, 2004 at 9:30 am; further that the Final Pretrial Conference shall be set for October 20 and 21, 2004 at 9:00 am ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 9/15/04] (cmcc)
September 13, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 859 ORDER subject to the applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the FRCivP the depositons of current and former employees of both Rambus and Infineon taken in the FTC Matter shall be admissible in this action...this Cour requests the FTC to make such depositions available for use in lthese proceedings at the earliest possible time (See Order for Details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 9/13/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile (9/13/4) to Donald D. Clark, Secretsary FTC, and Geoffrey D. Oliver, Assistant Director, Bureau of Competition, FTC [EOD Date: 9/14/04] (cgar)
September 13, 2004 Filing 858 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for dates of September 7, 2004 (cgar)
September 10, 2004 Filing 857 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [850-1] motion in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" (cgar)
September 8, 2004 Filing 856 OBJECTION by Rambus, Inc. to [826-1] (proposed) instructions jury by Infineon (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
September 8, 2004 Filing 855 OBJECTION by Infineon to [830-1] (proposed) instructions jury by Rambus, Inc. (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
September 8, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 854 ORDER that the Pltf's oral motion to take depositions of Charles Donahoe and David Gustavson is GRANTED, to the extent permitted in the telephone conference, neither deposition shall exceed four hours; it is further ORDERED that the hearing on Infineon's Motion In Limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents and Rambus's Motion In Limine Regarding the Terms "Memory Device and "Synchronous Memory Device" shall be held on September 27, 2004 during the Final Pre-Trial Conference ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 9/8/04] (kste)
September 7, 2004 Filing 853 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. to [850-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" (Exhibits A-C and D-N placed in two brown expandable files) (kste) Modified on 09/08/2004
September 7, 2004 Filing 852 TRANSCRIPT for dates of Aug. 20, 2004; conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (kste) Modified on 09/13/2004
August 31, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 849 ORDER granting [847-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" and the Clerk is directed to file the motion nunc pro tunc 08/27/04; the dfts shall file their response on 09/07/04 and the pltf shall file its reply on 09/10/04 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 8/31/04] (cgar)
August 27, 2004 Filing 851 MEMORANDUM (FILED NUNC PRO TUNC PER ORDER ENTERED 8/31/04) by Rambus, Inc. in support of [850-1] motion in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" (cgar)
August 27, 2004 Filing 850 MOTION (FILED NUNC PRO TUNC PER ORDER ENTERED 08/31/04) by Rambus, Inc. in limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" (cgar) Modified on 08/31/2004
August 27, 2004 Filing 847 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding Infineon's New Claim Constructions of the terms "Memory Device" and "Synchronous Memory Device" (Motion attached as exhibit 1 and MemSup placed on left) (Exhibits A-M placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
August 26, 2004 Filing 848 USCA Federal Circuit Order Infineon is directed to respond to the petiton for a writ of mandamus by 09/10/04 (cgar)
August 26, 2004 Filing 846 REPLY by Infineon to response to [832-1] motion by Infineon in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents (cgar)
August 25, 2004 Filing 845 NOTICE of Filing of Consolidated Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
August 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 844 STIPULATED ORDER CONCERNING PRETRIAL DATES; it is ORDERED that each party shall serve and file Responses and Objections to Proposed Jury Instructions on 9/8/04; each party shall serve Objections to Deposition Designations and Designated Written Discovery and Rebuttal and "Fairness" Deposition Designations and Designated Written Discovery on 9/8/04; each party shall serve Objections to Rebuttal and "Fairness" Deposition Designations and Designated Written Discovery on 9/15/04; parties shall meet and confer re: Unresolved Objections to Discovery Designations, Deposition Designations, Proposed Exhibits and Drafts by 9/20/04; each party shall serve and file Unresolved Objections to Discovery Designations, Deposition Designations and Proposed Exhibits on 9/21/04; Stipulations of Uncontroverted Facts will be served and filed on 9/21/04; proposed Pretrial Order will be served and filed on 9/21/04; and the Final Pretrial Conference will be held on 9/27/04 and if necessary (on 9/28/04); conformed sets of discovery designations and deposition designations and summaries of designated deposition testimony will be served on 9/30/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies y Mailed: [EOD Date: 8/25/04] (thom)
August 24, 2004 Filing 841 USCA Federal Circuit Order petition for writ of mandamus has been filed (8/20/04) (cgar)
August 23, 2004 Filing 843 USCA Federal Circuit Order it is ORDERED that: Rambus's petition for a writ of mandamus, Misc. 772 is denied; Rambus's oprevious petition, Misc. 762, is dismissed as moot; Rambus's motion for leave to file a reply, with reply attached, is granted; (dated 8/18/04) (thom)
August 23, 2004 Filing 842 Copy of Opinion of USCA Federal Circuit re: Decided 8/18/04 concurring in part and dissenting in part the District Court decision; (thom)
August 23, 2004 Filing 840 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [832-1] motion by Infineon, in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents (w/ declaration of Kelly M. Klaus, exhibits A-G to declaration placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
August 20, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 839 ORDER, if Rambus files its petition for rehearing en banc by 08/25/04 the stay of privileged document production previously entered herein on 05/18/04 shall continue in effect until the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decides the petition for rehearing en banc that Rambus has advised it intends to file ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 8/20/04] (cgar)
August 16, 2004 Filing 838 Response by Infineon to [831-1] proposed voir dire by Rambus (cgar)
August 16, 2004 Filing 837 OBJECTION by Rambus, Inc. to [828-1] proposed voir dire by Infineon (cgar)
August 13, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 836 ORDER (Stipulated Order Concerning Pretrial Dates) that 1) each party shall serve and file Responses and Objections to Proposed Jury Instructions on August 30, 2004; 2) each party shall serve objections to deposition designations and designated written discovery and rebuttal and "fairness" deposition designations and designated written discovery on August 30, 2004; 3) each party shall serve Objections to Rebuttal and "Fairness" Deposition Designations and Designated Written Discovery on September 2, 2004; 4) the parties shall meet and confer regarding unresolved objections (see order for details) by September 6, 2004; 5) the parties shall exchange deposition designations from the August 2004 depositions of Messrs. Bette, Kiehl and von Zitzewitz on the following schedule (see Order for details); 6) each party shall serve and file unresolved objections to discovery designations, deposition designations, and proposed exhibits on September 7, 2004; 7) stipulations of uncontroverted facts will be served and filed on September 7, 2004; 8) the proposed Pretrial Order will be served and filed on September 7, 2004; and 9) the Final Pretrial Conference remains as scheduled on September 13 (and, if necessary 14, 2004 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/13/04] (cmcc)
August 12, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 835 ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 2, to Exclude Evidence or Argument that Plaintiff's Amendment of Patent Claims was Based on "Stolen" Ideas or was Otherwise Wrongful or Illegal (Docket No. 576) is denied; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 8/12/04] (thom)
August 12, 2004 Filing 834 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (thom)
August 10, 2004 Filing 833 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [832-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents (khan)
August 10, 2004 Filing 832 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Certain Third-Party Documents (khan) Modified on 08/10/2004
August 9, 2004 Filing 831 PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (khan)
August 9, 2004 Filing 830 Proposed Jury instructions by Rambus, Inc. without authorities (khan)
August 9, 2004 Filing 829 Proposed Jury instructions by Rambus, Inc. with authorities (khan)
August 9, 2004 Filing 828 PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (khan)
August 9, 2004 Filing 827 Proposed Preliminary Jury instructions by Infineon, Infineon (khan)
August 9, 2004 Filing 826 Proposed Jury instructions by Infineon, Infineon (khan)
August 9, 2004 Proposed Verdict Form Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro 49(B) received and placed on left (khan)
August 3, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 825 ORDER granting [823-1] motion by Infineon for Clarification; the Clerk is directed to substitute the accompanying amended page 12 for the page 12 in the Memorandum Opinion filed on July 13, 2004 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 8/3/04] (cgar)
August 2, 2004 Filing 824 RESPONSEby Rambus, Inc. to [823-1] motion by Infineon for Clarification (cgar)
July 28, 2004 Filing 823 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Clarification (khan)
July 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 822 ORDER granting [820-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Motion for Clarification. The Clerk is directed to file the dfts' proferred Motion for Clarification. The plfs shall respond to this Motion for Clarification by 8/2/04. The dfts may file any reply by 8/5/04. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 7/27/04) Copies Mailed and Faxed: y [EOD Date: 7/28/04] (khan)
July 26, 2004 Filing 821 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [820-1] motion for Leave to File Motion for Clarification (cgar)
July 26, 2004 Filing 820 MOTION by Infineon for Leave to File Motion for Clarification (Motion Recv'd and placed on left) (cgar) Modified on 07/26/2004
July 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 819 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [520-2] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200, to the extent that the motion seeks dismissal pursuant to FRCivP 12 (b)(6) is DENIED, to the extent that the motion seeks the entry of partial summary judgment respecting that part of Count 15 seeking attorneys fees, money damages, and restitution, it is GRANTED ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/23/04] (cgar)
July 23, 2004 Filing 818 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
July 21, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 817 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [644-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Office ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 7/21/04] (thom)
July 21, 2004 Filing 816 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (thom)
July 21, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 815 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [702-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (see order for specific details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/21/04] (kste)
July 21, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 814 ORDER denying [646-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/21/04] (kste)
July 21, 2004 Filing 813 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (kste)
July 21, 2004 Filing 812 TRANSCRIPT for date of July 16, 2004 hearing on Rambus' Motion in Limine No. 2 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (thom)
July 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 811 ORDER denying [784-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike the revised reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the 06/16/04 declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander. It is further ORDERED that the facts and legal contentions are adequarely presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process. The hearing on thie matter currently scheduled to occur by telephone on 7/20/04 is here CANCELLED. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed and FAXED: y [EOD Date: 7/19/04] (khan)
July 16, 2004 Filing 810 Minute entry: Payne, J., Tracy Stroh, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Arguments had by counsel on the "Kingsdown Issue". Motion taken under advisement by the Court. (snea)
July 14, 2004 Filing 809 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [784-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike the revised reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the 06/16/04 declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander by Rambus, Inc. (scoo)
July 13, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 808 ORDER denying [704-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses, denying [700-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 7/13/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/14/04] (cgar)
July 13, 2004 Filing 807 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 7/13/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar) Modified on 07/14/2004
July 13, 2004 Filing 806 Continuation TRANSCRIPT of Summary Judgment Motions before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 07/01/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
July 12, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 805 ORDER granting [694-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/12/04] (cgar)
July 12, 2004 Filing 804 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
July 9, 2004 Filing 803 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [784-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike the revised reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the 06/16/04 declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander (Exhibits A-H placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
July 9, 2004 Filing 802 TRANSCRIPT of hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 06/30/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 07/09/2004
July 9, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [565-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision set at 10:00 7/16/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
July 6, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 801 ORDER te Dfts' response to the Renewed Objection to the Supplement Expert Reports of Joseph C. McAlexander of the Pltf shall be filed by the Dfts by 07/09/04;the Pltf's reply, if any, may be filed by 07/14/04, not 07/12/04 as previously ordered ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and fascimile [EOD Date: 7/7/04] (cgar)
July 6, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 800 ORDER the Dfts' response to the Renewed Objection to the Supplement Expert reports of Joseph C. McAlexander of the Pltf, currently due for filing on 07/06/04 shall be filed by the Dfts by 07/09/04; the Pltf reply, if any, may be filed by 07/12/04 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and fascimile [EOD Date: 7/7/04] (cgar)
July 2, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 799 ORDER oral argument respecting Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister, Inc., 863 F.2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988), is SCHEDULED for 07/16/04 at 10:00am; oral argument respecting the Renewed Objection to the Supplement Expert Reports of Joseph C. McAlexander of the Pltf is SCHEDULED to occur telephonically on 07/20/04 at 3:00 pm ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/2/04] (cgar)
July 1, 2004 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a continuation of the hearing on motions from yesterday. Arguments had. Motions submitted to the Court. (snea)
June 30, 2004 Filing 798 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on various motions. See Transcript of Proceedings in case file for rulings made by the Court. Court adjourned at 5:00 p.m. to return tomorrow for further hearing on motions. (snea)
June 30, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [704-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses set at 10:00 7/1/04, [702-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 set at 10:00 7/1/04, [700-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 set at 10:00 7/1/04, [698-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" set at 10:00 7/1/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
June 28, 2004 Filing 797 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. [796-1] Regarding Stipulation by Infineon and Rambus (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 796 Stipulations regarding the Timing and Sequence of Events Relating to the Dismissal of Rambus's Patent Claims During the 2001 Trial filed by Rambus and Infineon (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 795 Response by Infineon to [789-1] Memorandum regarding the Timing and Sequence of Procedural Events during the 2001 Trial (order response) by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 794 Response by Infineon to [788-1] Supplemental Memorandum of Law regarding Equitable Estoppel (order response) by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 793 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [785-1] Brief regarding the Timing and Sequence of Certain Events During the 2001 (order response) by Infineon Inc. (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 792 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [786-1] Supplemental Memorandum Regarding the "Unlawful" Prong of California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 Counterclaim Count 15 (order response) by Infineon (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 791 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [787-1] Supplemental Memorandum of Law Regarding Equitable Estoppel ( order response) by Infineon Inc. (cgar)
June 28, 2004 Filing 790 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [785-1] Memorandum Regarding the Impact of the Federal Circuit's Claim Construction of Infineon's Invalidity and Unenforceability Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses (order response) by Infineon (cgar)
June 28, 2004 USCA Federal Circuit LETTER petiton for writ of mandamus has been filed (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Filing 789 RESPONSE (Opening Brief regarding the Timing and Sequence of Certain Events During the 2001 Trial of this Case) by Rambus, Inc. to [772-1] order (Exhibits A-J placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Filing 788 RESPONSE (Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses) by Rambus, Inc. to [772-1] order (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Filing 787 RESPONSE (Supplemental Memorandum of Law Regarding Equitable Estoppel) by Infineon to [772-1] order (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Filing 786 RESPONSE (Supplemental Memorandum of Law Regarding the "Unlawful" Prong of California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200, Counterclaim Count 15) by Infineon to [772-1] Order (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Filing 785 RESPONSE (Memorandum Regarding the Impact of the Federal Circuit's Claim Construction and the Sequence and Timing of the 2001 Trial Events on Infineon's Invalidity and Unenforceability Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses) by Infineon to [772-1] Order (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Filing 784 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Strike the revised reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the 06/16/04 declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 783 ORDER havng considered the Pltf's Memorandum RE Amended Expert Reports (docket #774) and finding that the Pltf has shown good cause for its request to file its proffered Motion to Strike the Revised Reply Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the 06/16/04 Declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander, pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Order of 05/21/04 the Pltf's request to file that motion is GRANTED...Pltf's proffered Motion to Strike the Revised Reply Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the 06/16/04 Declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander is DENIED AS MOOT to the extent it challenges the 06/16/04 Declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 782 ORDER denying [698-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 781 ORDER denying [696-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) (See Order for Details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 780 ORDER denying [692-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 779 ORDER denying [690-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent, provide, however, that the construction of the term "block size" in this Court's Opinion of 03/15/01 shall not be open to revisition by virtue of expert testimony offered at trial (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 778 ORDER denying [648-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment of Infringement;the the parties are admonished that the construction of the term "block size" in the claim construction Opinion of 3/15/01 shall not be open to revisitatin by virtue of expert testimony offered at trial (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar)
June 25, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 777 ORDER granting [625-1] motion by Infineon for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile) [EOD Date: 6/25/04] (cgar) Modified on 06/25/2004
June 24, 2004 Filing 776 OBJECTION by Rambus, Inc. to [767-1] Declaration of Joseph C. McAlexander (attached as exhibit P to response reply by Infineon (cgar)
June 24, 2004 Filing 775 RESPONSE (Memorandum re: Revised Expert Reply Reports and their Impact on the Pending Motions for Summary Judgment of Invalidity) by Infineon to [756-1] order (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
June 24, 2004 Filing 774 RESPONSE (re: Amended Expert Reports) by Rambus, Inc. to [756-1] order (cgar)
June 24, 2004 Filing 773 Complete TRANSCRIPT of Conference Call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of June 23, 2004 (placed in brown expandable) (khan)
June 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 772 ORDER by 5:00 pm on June 25, 2004 the Dfts shall file additional briefing respecting why they believe the claim constructions imposed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed Cir. havee affected their affirmative defenses of invalidity and unenforceability of the patents-in-suit...; the Pltf shall file a response thereto by 5:00pm on 06/28/04; by 5:00pm on 06/25/04 the Dfts shall file additional briefing respecting precisely what statutes and laws they are relying on in asserting their "unlawful" claim under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200...; Pltf shall file a response thereto by 5:00 pm on 06/28/04; by 5:00 pm on 06/25/04 the parties shall file simultaneous papers addressing the requested additional briefing respecting the Pltf's pending Motion for Summary Judgment on Dfts' Equitable Estoppel Defenses; the parties shall file simultaneous responses thereto by 5;00 pm on 06/28/04; by 5:00 pm on 06/25/04 the parties shall file simultaneous briefs addressing the timing and sequence of events during the 2001 trial of this case...by 5;00 pm on 06/28/04 the parties may file responsive briefs; by 5:00 pm on 06/28/04 the parties shall file a stipulation setting forth the timing and sequence of events during the 2001 trial of this case (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 6/23/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile (6/23/04) [EOD Date: 6/24/04] (cgar)
June 22, 2004 Filing 771 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [770-1] Memorandum Regarding Kinsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister, Inc. 863 F.2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988) by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon (khan)
June 18, 2004 Filing 770 Memorandum regarding the meaning of Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister Inc. (Fed.Cir. 1988) filed by defendants Infineon (Exhibits #1-17 placed in brown expandable) (Exhibits #1-4, 7, 9, & 13 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
June 18, 2004 Filing 769 TRANSCRIPT of motions before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 06/09/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
June 16, 2004 Filing 768 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. to response to [698-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" (thom)
June 16, 2004 Filing 767 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. to response to [692-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 (thom)
June 16, 2004 Filing 766 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. to response to [696-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits NOT UNDER SEAL placed in brown expandable) (thom) Modified on 06/17/2004
June 16, 2004 Filing 765 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. to response to [694-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent (FILED UNDER SEAL) (thom)
June 16, 2004 Filing 764 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. to response to [690-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent (thom)
June 16, 2004 Filing 763 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [704-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses (thom)
June 16, 2004 Filing 762 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [702-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (thom)
June 16, 2004 Filing 761 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [700-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (thom)
June 15, 2004 Filing 760 Revised Third Supplemental Rule 26 Disclosure of William R. Huber by Rambus, Inc. (thom)
June 14, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 759 ORDER by Order entered on 06/10/04, the Court ordered the parties to exchange their respective section for the initial draft of the pretrial order on 07/31/04; in addition the Court ordered the parties to serve their final witness and exhibit list on 07/31/04; 07/31/04 however is a Saturday; the parties shall exchange their respective sections for the initial draft of the pretrial order and serve their final witness and exhibit list on Friday 07/30/04 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/14/04] (cgar)
June 14, 2004 Filing 758 OBJECTION by Rambus, Inc. to Declarations of Joseph McAlexander (cgar)
June 14, 2004 Filing 757 Opening Memorandum Regarding Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister Inc., 863 F.2D 867 (Fed Cir. 1988) filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (2 CDs containing recording of the 06/03/02 argument before the Federal Circuit placed in brown envelope and given to Chambers) (cgar)
June 14, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 756 ORDER by Order entered on 6/10/04, the Court required the parties' patent experts, Dr. William Huber and Mr. Joseph C. McAlexander, to file amended reports; the Pltf shall serve the amended report of Dr. Huber by 06/15/04; the Dfts shall sere the amended report of Mr. McAlexander by 06/21/04; by 06/24/04 the parties shall file memoranda addressing how, if at all, these amended reports affect any of the pending motions for summary judgment ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/14/04] (cgar)
June 10, 2004 Filing 755 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 6/10/04 (cgar) Modified on 06/14/2004
June 10, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 754 ORDER that the following events shall occur on the following schedule...September 13 (*and 14, if necessary), 2004, October 4, 2004 TRIAL (see Order for 17 additonal dates) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 6/14/04] (cgar)
June 10, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 753 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [627-1] motion by Infineon to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (Dfts' Motion to Strike Certain Sections of the Supplemental Reply Report of Prof. David J. Teece is DENIED AS MOOT to those sections The Motion to Strike Certain Sections of the Supplemental Reply Report of Prof. David J. Teece is otherwise GRANTED) , granting [567-1] motion by Infineon to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter RETAINED UNDER CONSIDERATION, [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin RETAINED UNDER CONSIDERATION, DENIED AS MOOT Motion to Strike the Portions of the the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's Construction of read request, granting in part, denying in part, and RETAINED UNDER CONSIDERATION IN PART [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things, granting to the extent stated on record [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents, the Dfts shall by, July 1, 20004, provide to the Pltf the lock-in documents as agreed to on the record durning the hearing on March 16, 2004 (SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/14/04] (cgar)
June 10, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 752 ORDER Rambus' Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence or Argument Regarding Alleged Breach of Duties or Other Obligations by Rambus to Infineon or Other JEDEC members, the supporting, responsive, and reply memoranda, and the argument of counsel, and having concluded that, in reality, the motion is more properly regarded as a motion for partial summary judgment, the motion is denied without prejudice to considerastion of the issues therein discussed as part of the pending summary judgment motions ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 6/10/04] (cgar)
June 9, 2004 Filing 751 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a hearing on motions. Various Motions argued. Motions granted in part; denied in part. Order to enter. See transcript of proceedings or Order to be entered by the Court for the rulings made by the Court. (snea)
June 9, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 9:00 6/10/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 9:00 6/10/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 9:00 6/10/04, [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things set at 9:00 6/10/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
June 9, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [741-1] stipulation regarding third party discovery. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 6/8/04 ) Copies Mailed: y (khan) Modified on 06/09/2004
June 7, 2004 Filing 750 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [698-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" (w/Declaration of William R. Huber in Support of Rambus's Oppositions to Infineon's Motions for Summary Judgement w/Exhibits A-C, #1-18 and D placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
June 7, 2004 Filing 749 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [690-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent (cgar)
June 7, 2004 Filing 748 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [696-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits #1-9 placed in brown expandable (Exhibit #7 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
June 7, 2004 Filing 747 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [692-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 (Exhibits #1-7 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
June 7, 2004 Filing 746 RESPONSE(in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [694-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent (Exhibit 1 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
June 7, 2004 Filing 745 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [702-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (Joint Appendix of Exhibits (#1-42) placed in brown expandable Exhibits FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 06/08/2004
June 7, 2004 Filing 744 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [704-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses (Joint Appendix of Exhibits (#1-42) placed in brown expandable (16 exhibits FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 06/08/2004
June 7, 2004 Filing 743 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [700-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (Joint Appendix of Exhibts (#1-42) placed in brown expandable (16 exhibits FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 06/08/2004
June 4, 2004 Filing 742 Stipulations regarding filing dates filed by Rambus, Inc., and Infineon (cgar)
June 4, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [742-1] stipulation regarding filing dates ( signed by Judge Henry E. Hudson ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile (cgar)
June 3, 2004 Filing 741 Stipulations regarding thrid party discovery filed by Rambus, Inc. and Infineon (cgar)
June 2, 2004 Filing 740 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [708-1] motion to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin (Filed Under Seal) (cgar)
June 2, 2004 Filing 739 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 05/28/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
June 2, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 738 ORDER granting [565-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision. It is ORDERED that the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 6/2/04] (khan)
June 2, 2004 Filing 737 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (khan)
June 1, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 10:00 6/9/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 10:00 6/9/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 10:00 6/9/04, [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things set at 10:00 6/9/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
May 28, 2004 Filing 736 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Infineon Inc. to [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin by Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL w/Exhibits ALSO UNDER SEAL) (thom)
May 28, 2004 Filing 735 TRANSCRIPT for date of May 21, 2004 hearing of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (placed in brown expandable (thom)
May 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 733 ORDER that the hearing currently scheduled for June 9, 2004 at 9:00 is moved to June 9, 2004 at 10:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/28/04] (scoo)
May 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 732 ORDER that the deft's oral motion, made pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Order of May 21, 2004, for protection against the pltf's request for leave to file a motion to compel discovery of Kirkland & Ellis LLP is GRANTED, thus the plf may not file is proposed motion, there being no good cause shown therefor ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/28/04] (scoo)
May 28, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 10:00 6/9/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 10:00 6/9/04, [656-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Supplemental Brief on subject matter waiver set at 10:00 6/9/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 10:00 6/9/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
May 28, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [734-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Carolyn Luedtke to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 76383 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (scoo)
May 27, 2004 Filing 734 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Carolyn Luedtke to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 76383 (scoo)
May 27, 2004 Filing 731 RESPONSE (Notice) by Infineon of filing with the FTC pursuant to the Courts' April 27, 2004 Bench Order (cgar)
May 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 730 ORDER granting [574-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence; it is further ORDERED that the factsd and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar)
May 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 729 ORDER granting [569-1] motion by Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies; it is further ORDERED (Dft's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (dkt #569) that the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar) Modified on 05/27/2004
May 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 728 ORDER granting [572-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision it is further ORDERED that the facts and legal contentiions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar)
May 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 727 ORDER (Plt'f Motion in Limine No. 4 (dkt #576)) the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar)
May 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 726 ORDER under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Pltf's motion is DENIED IN PART AS MOOT AND GRANTED IN PART ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar)
May 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 725 ORDER that the parties shall file briefing addressed to the meaning of the part of the decision in Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister, Inc. on which Rambus relies as the predicate for this motion. . . . SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS; the plf shall file a memorandum by 6/7/04; the dfts dhsll file a responsive memorandum by 6/15/04; the plfs may file a reply memorandum by 6/18/04; the parties are admonished that, except as is necessary to account for evidentiary developments during the trial, the Court will entertain no further proposed instruction based on Kingdom, it being the intent of the Court to foreclose further litigation over this issue at the last minute such as been the the inclination of the parties herein as of late. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed and Faxed: yes [EOD Date: 5/26/04] (khan)
May 25, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 9:00 6/9/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 9:00 6/9/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 9:00 6/9/04, [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things set at 9:00 6/9/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
May 25, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [574-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence set at 9:00 6/10/04, [572-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision set at 9:00 6/10/04, [569-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies set at 9:00 6/10/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
May 25, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [704-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses set at 9:00 6/30/04, [702-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 set at 9:00 6/30/04, [700-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 set at 9:00 6/30/04, [698-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" set at 9:00 6/30/04, [696-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) set at 9:00 6/30/04, [694-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent set at 9:00 6/30/04, [692-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 set at 9:00 6/30/04, [690-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent set at 9:00 6/30/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
May 24, 2004 Filing 724 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [648-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Filed Under SEAL) (Exhibits 1 & 2 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 24, 2004 Filing 723 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [646-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) (cgar)
May 24, 2004 Filing 722 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [644-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Office (Exhibit A FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 21, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 721 SCHEDULING ORDER the Dfts shall file a response to the Pltf's Motion to Compel Answers to Questions Asked at Deposition of Witnesses Bette and Corwin by May 28, 2004; the Dfts may file any reply by June 2, 2004;On April 19, 2004 the Pltf filed three Motions for Summary Judgment; on May 12, 2004 the Dfts filed responses to these motions; the Pltf may file any replies by May 24, 2004; On May 17, 2004, both parties filed several motions for Summary Judgment; all responses to these Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed by June 4, 2004; any replies may be filed by June 14, 2004; a hearing on any pending Discovery Motions, i.e., motions to compel and motions pertaining to expert reports other than Motions in Limine, not resolved on the papers is hereby scheduled for June 9, 2004 at 9:00 am, if the Court is available on that date; if not argument on those motions shall be held on July 1, 2004; a hearing on any pending Motions in Limine not resolved on the papers is hereby scheduled for June 10, 2004 at 9:00 am; a hearing on any Motions for Summary Judgment not resolved on the papers, as well as oral argument on the Dfts' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Certain of Pltf's Affirmative Defenses, is hereby scheduled for June 30, 2004 at 9:00 am, to be continued on July 1, 2004 if necessary; furthermore, the parties shall not file any additional motions without leave of Court and good cause shown ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 5/21/04] (cgar)
May 20, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 720 ORDER the Memorandum Opinions, dkt #s 713 and 716 shall be UNSEALED, placed in the public record, and shall be delivered immediately to counsel for the Dfts; the proposed additional briefing and hearing are neither required nor appropriate, the request of the Pltf for additional proceeding is denied (01/05/04 Motion to Compel (dkt #653); the Dfts request to release dkt #s 712 and 715 to appellate counsel for the Dfts is deferred for consideration by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 5/20/04] (cgar)
May 20, 2004 Filing 719 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [710-1] order regarding the Memorandum Opinions filed at docket # 713 and 716 (cgar)
May 19, 2004 Filing 718 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 05/14/4 (cgar)
May 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 717 ORDER that until further order, the Clerk shall place under SEAL the following documents: 268,270,271,279 ,313, 315, 317,319,325,326,327,358,363,364 ,367,371,373,374,375,376,528,644,1114,1960,2331,2784,an d 4077; Counsel for Defts shall not have access to these documents until further order of the Court, and Rambus shall forthwith retrieve the balance of the documents for the Chambers of the Court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes, and faxed [EOD Date: 5/19/04] (kste)
May 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 716 MEMORANDUM OPINION (UNSEALed per Order entered 05/20/04) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (Pltf only) (cgar) Modified on 05/20/2004
May 18, 2004 Filing 715 MEMORANDUM OPINION (FILED UNDER SEAL) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (Pltf only) (cgar)
May 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 714 ORDER (1) the Plt shall produce to the Dfts immediately the following numbered documents (See Order for DETAILS)...(5) the Pltf...intends to seek immediate appellate review of this Order, this request, being unopposed by the Dfts, is granted; thus, the implementation of this Order shall be stayed pending appellate review by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and further order of this Court thereafter ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/18/04] (cgar)
May 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 713 MEMORANDUM OPINION (UnSEALed Per Order entered 05/20/04) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (Pltf only) (cgar) Modified on 05/20/2004
May 18, 2004 Filing 712 MEMORANDUM OPINION (FILED UNDER SEAL) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (Pltf only) (cgar)
May 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 711 ORDER granting [492-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production...(6) the Pltf having advised that it intends to appeal this Order and having asked for a stay hereof pending appeal, and the Dfts having advised that they do not oppose a stay and the trial hereby having been rescheduled to 09/27/04 it is hereby ORDERED that this Order is stayed pending appeal and further ORder of this Court thereafter ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/18/04] (cgar)
May 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 710 ORDER the Pltf shall by 05/20/04 at 1:00 pm eastern daylight time submit its filing respecting whether any portions of the non-sealed versions of the Memorandum Opinions filed herewith contain any privilege information that ought not be revealed pending interlocutory appeal; the Clerk is directed: (1) to file all four Memorandum Opinons submitted herewith under seal where they shall remain until further order of the Court; and (2) TO DELIVER COPIES OF ALL FOUR MEMORANDUM OPINIONS ONLY TO COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNTIL OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE COURT ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/18/04] (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 709 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [708-1] motion to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin (Filed Under SEAL) (Exhibits A-D Filed Under SEAl) (Proposed Order REcv'd) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 708 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin (Filed Under SEAL) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 707 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [665-1] motion to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents (Filed Under SEAL) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 706 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [669-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike portions of the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's Construction of read request (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 705 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [704-1] motion for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses (Proposed Order Recv'd and placed on left) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 704 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 703 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [702-1] motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (Proposed Order Recv'd and placed on left) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 702 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 701 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [700-1] motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (Proposed Order Recv'd and placed on left) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 700 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 699 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [698-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" (Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits A-J Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 698 MOTION by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 697 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [696-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) (Filed Under SEAL) (Exhibits A-I Filed Under SEAl) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 696 MOTION by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) (cgar) Modified on 05/18/2004
May 17, 2004 Filing 695 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [694-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent (Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits A-S and Declaration of JCM w/ Exhibits A-B Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 694 MOTION by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 693 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [692-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-I Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 692 MOTION by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 (cgar)
May 17, 2004 Filing 691 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [690-1] motion for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-I Filed Under SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 05/18/2004
May 17, 2004 Filing 690 MOTION by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent (cgar)
May 13, 2004 Filing 689 Response by Rambus to [675-1] motion (May 5, 2004 Letter Brief) response by Infineon Regarding Pending Motion to Compel Production of Doucments and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 13, 2004 Filing 688 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [648-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment of Infringement (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-N FILED UNDER SEAL, Declaration of Jospeh C. McAlexander and supporting Exhibits A-G FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 13, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 687 ORDER granting [683-1] motion for Leave to File brief to exceed local rule 7(E)(3) page limitation ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/13/04] (cgar)
May 13, 2004 Filing 686 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for dates of 05/07/04 (placed in brown expanable) (cgar) Modified on 05/13/2004
May 12, 2004 Filing 685 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [644-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Officei (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS A-K FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 12, 2004 Filing 684 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [646-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
May 12, 2004 Filing 683 MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Infineon for Leave to File brief to exceed local rule 7(E)(3) page limitation (cgar)
May 10, 2004 Filing 682 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [669-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike portions of the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's Construction of read request (Exhibits A-G Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
May 10, 2004 Filing 681 RESPONSE by Infineon to [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents (cgar)
May 10, 2004 Filing 680 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [662-1] motion to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter (Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
May 10, 2004 Filing 679 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [660-1] motion to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things (cgar)
May 6, 2004 Filing 678 AMENDDED Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [531-1] counterclaim by Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL) EXHIBITS PLACED IN BROWN EXPANDABLE (cgar)
May 6, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 677 ORDER granting [638-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes 5/6/4 [EOD Date: 5/7/04] (cgar)
May 4, 2004 Filing 676 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. to [660-1] renewed motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things (with exhibits marked 1-11, placed in redwell expandable) (walk) Modified on 05/05/2004
May 4, 2004 Filing 675 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. (in OPPOSITION) to [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter (FILED UNDER SEAL) (walk) Modified on 05/05/2004
April 30, 2004 Filing 674 TRANSCRIPT for date of 04/27/04 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (cgar)
April 28, 2004 Filing 673 Surreply filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., regarding subject matter waiver as unit pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges [659-1] by Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 672 ORDER granting [667-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Surreply regarding subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges;the Clerk is directed to file the Pltf's Surreply Regarding Subject Matter Waiver as it Pertains to Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/29/04] (cgar)
April 27, 2004 Filing 671 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Arguments had on Defendant's Motion Re: Subject Matter Waiver, Exfoliation. Arguments had on Plaintiff's Motion to Take Discovery Re: Document retention. Motions taken under adivsement by the Court. (snea)
April 26, 2004 Filing 670 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [669-1] motion to Strike portions of the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's Construction of read request(Declaration of Peter A. Detre and Exhibits (A-E attached) Exhibits 1-4 SEAL) (cgar)
April 26, 2004 Filing 669 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Strike portions of the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's Construction of read request (cgar)
April 26, 2004 Filing 668 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [667-1] motion for Leave to File Surreply regarding subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges (Surreply recv'd (SEALED)) (cgar)
April 26, 2004 Filing 667 MOTION by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Surreply regarding subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges (cgar)
April 26, 2004 Filing 666 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [665-1] motion to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents (Declaration of Sean P. Gates attached) (Exhibits (#1-17) to Declaration of S.P. Gates placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
April 26, 2004 Filing 665 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents (cgar)
April 26, 2004 Filing 664 RESPONSE by Infineon to [638-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 663 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [662-1] motion to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 662 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 661 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [660-1] renewed motion to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 660 RENEWED MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 659 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF filed by defendant Infineon regarding Rambus's waiver of the attorney-client and work product privileges on the subject of Rambus's pre-trial document destruction [623-1](FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 658 ORDER granting [656-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Supplemental Brief on subject matter waiver ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/23/04] (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 657 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [656-1] motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief on subject matter waiver (Brief Recv'd and placed under SEAL) (cgar)
April 23, 2004 Filing 656 MOTION by Infineon for Leave to File Supplemental Brief on subject matter waiver (cgar)
April 22, 2004 Filing 655 REPLY Memorandum in Support by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. to response to [625-1] motion by Infineon for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (khan)
April 22, 2004 Filing 654 REPLY (Memorandum in Support) by Infineon to response to [627-1] motion by Infineon to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (khan)
April 22, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [652-1] stipulation regarding third party discovery ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (khan)
April 22, 2004 Filing 652 Stipulations Re: Third Party Discovery filed by Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon (thom) Modified on 05/20/2004
April 21, 2004 Filing 653 Rambus's Memorandum Regarding the Possible Disclosure of Privileged Information in the Court's Memorandum Opinion REgarding Infineon's January 5, 2004 Motion to Compel. (khan)
April 20, 2004 Filing 651 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [625-1] motion by Infineon for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (cgar)
April 20, 2004 Filing 650 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [627-1] motion by Infineon to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (Filed Under Seal) (Exhibits #1-6 filed under SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 04/20/2004
April 19, 2004 Filing 649 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [648-1] motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Filed Under SEAL) (Exhibits 1-18 placed in brown expandable (Exhibits 1,16,17 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 19, 2004 Filing 648 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
April 19, 2004 Filing 647 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [646-1] motion for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) (Exhibits #1-5 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
April 19, 2004 Filing 646 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) (cgar)
April 19, 2004 Filing 645 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [644-1] motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Office (Exhibits #1-6 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
April 19, 2004 Filing 644 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Office (cgar)
April 16, 2004 Filing 643 Supplemental Memorandum on Subject Matter Waiver as it Pertains to Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. [605-1] (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 642 ORDER that the hearing respecting the alleged spoliation of the dfts and the scope of the subject-matter waiver effectuated by the plf currently scheduled for 4/15/04 at 8:00 a.m. is hereby CONTINUED until 4/27/04 at 9:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/15/04] (khan)
April 15, 2004 Oral Argument Hearing as to Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. set 9:00 4/27/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
April 14, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 641 ORDER that the request for an extension to file its supplemental reply re: subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges; it is hereby ORDERED that the request is granted; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff shall file its supplemental reply by 4/16/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 4/14/04] (thom)
April 14, 2004 Filing 640 TRANSCRIPT for dates of April 2, 2004 of Conference Call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (khan)
April 13, 2004 Filing 639 MEMORANDUM in support of [638-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims (Amended Reply to Dfts' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims with exhibits-Rece'd Only pending ruling of court; UNDER SEAL) (kste)
April 13, 2004 Filing 638 MOTION by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims (sketch order placed on left) (kste) Modified on 04/13/2004
April 12, 2004 Filing 637 REPLY by Infineon to response to [572-1] motion in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision (cgar)
April 12, 2004 Filing 636 REPLY by Infineon to response to [574-1] motion in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (cgar)
April 12, 2004 Filing 635 REPLY by Infineon to response to [569-1] motion in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (cgar)
April 12, 2004 Filing 634 REPLY by Infineon to response to [565-1] motion in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision (cgar)
April 12, 2004 Filing 633 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine #3 to exclude evidence or argument regarding prior District Court comments or findings regarding potential trial witnesses (cgar)
April 12, 2004 Filing 632 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine #2 (to exclude evidence or argument that Rambus's amendment of patent cliams was based on "stolen" ideas or was otherwise wrongful or illegal (cgar)
April 12, 2004 Filing 631 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine #1 (to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding alleged breach of duties or other obligations by Rambus to Infineon or other JEDEC members) (cgar)
April 9, 2004 Filing 630 Reply by Rambus, Inc. on Subject Matter Waiver as it Pertains to Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges [605-1] by Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 9, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 629 ORDER, if the Pltf feels itself aggrieved and is so inclined, it may file a supplemental reply brief (re: Rambus' Reply Memorandum on Subject Matter W waiver as it pertains to Attorney-client and work product privileges filed on April 9, 2004) by 5:00 pm April 14, 2004 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 4/12/04] (cgar)
April 8, 2004 Filing 628 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [627-1] motion to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (Exhibits 5-8 placed under SEAL) (cgar)
April 8, 2004 Filing 627 MOTION by Infineon to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (cgar)
April 8, 2004 Filing 626 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [625-1] motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (cgar)
April 8, 2004 Filing 625 MOTION by Infineon for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (cgar)
April 6, 2004 Filing 624 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits FILED UNDER SEAL) (khan) Modified on 04/07/2004
April 6, 2004 Filing 623 Memorandum Regarding Rambus's Waiver of the Attorney Client and Work Product Privileges on the Subject of Rambus's Pre-Trial Document Destruction filed by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL) (khan) Modified on 04/07/2004
April 6, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [614-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Lynn Healey Scaduto to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874, granting [613-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Steven M. Perry to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 622 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [565-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 621 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [572-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 620 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [574-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 619 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [569-1] motion by Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 618 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (to exclude evidence or argument based on expert testimony not disclosed in an allowed ruel 26 report) (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 617 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (to exclude evidence or argument regarding prior District Court comments or findings regarding potential trial witnesses) (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 616 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (To exclude evidence or argument that Rambus's amendment of Patent Claims was based on "stolen" ideas or was otherwise wrongful or illegal) (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 615 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (Seeking to Exclude evidence or argument related to Rambus' JEDEC-Related conduct (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 614 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Lynn Healey Scaduto to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874 (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Filing 613 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Steven M. Perry to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874 (cgar)
April 5, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 612 Stipulated Order that Rambus' attorney-client privilege and work product objections to the production or introduction into evidence of the documents listed on Attachment A are deemed to have been made and overruled on the grounds stated in the Court's Feb. 26, 2004 Order; that the documents listed on Attachment A to this Stipulated Order and the realted depositions may be disclosed to members of the parties' respective trial teams on an "Outside Counsel Only" basis but shall not be disclosed to others, either voluntarily or in response to subpoena, without further order of the Court (See Stipulated Order for detaisl) (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 04/02/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/5/04] (cgar)
April 1, 2004 Filing 611 TRANSCRIPT of hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of March 26, 2004 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
April 1, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 610 ORDER for the reasons stated on the record of 01/08/04 it is ORDERED (1) that the following claims of the following patents having been decided anf disposed of by previus orders which were not appealed shall not be the subject of further proceedings in this remand either by way of discovery of trial... (2) the following claims of the following patents shall be the subject of further proceedings in this remand by both discovery and trial to the extent allowed by the claim construction opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and any orders entered herein respecting the scope of discovery and trial as to such claims of such patents... (7) the definitions of "Block Size", "First External Clock Signal" and "Second External Clock Signal" are controlled by the Court's March 15, 2001, Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion (Docket No. 198)...(SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 4/2/04] (cgar)
April 1, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 609 Stipulated Order any briefs in opposition to pending motions in limine shall be filed by 04/25/04, any reply briefs shall be filed by 04/12/04 and a hearing on those moitons in limine shall be held on a date to be determined by subsequent Order of the Court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 4/1/04] (cgar)
April 1, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 608 ORDER granting [541-1] motion by Infineon to Strike the Industry Royalty rates section of the Supplemental Expert Report of Prof. David J. Teece, granting in part, denying in part [527-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental Report of Dennis W. Carlton, specifically respecting Dr. Carlton's supplemental report, the Motion is DENIED respecting the Pltf's challenge to the portion of the report pertaining to geographic market, except to the extent noted on the record, the Motion also is DENIED respecting the Pltf's challenge to the portion of the report pertaining to alleged anti-competitive effects absent a showing of market power, the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT with respect to that portion of Dr. Carlton's supplemental report containing his assertion that his economic opinion is not altered by the decision of the U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Respecting Mr. McAlexander's supplemental report, the Motion is GRANTED AS to sections 2.2 AND 2.3 of the report;the Request for Supplemental Expert Reports of the Pltf (dkt #517) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, specifically, the Motion is GRANTED to the extent the Pltf seeks to submit the supplemental expert report of Dr. William Huber respecting the claim term Read Request, but DENIED to the extent the Pltf seeks to submit the supplemental expert report of Dr. William Huber respecting the claim terms First External Clock Signal and Second External Clock Signal ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/1/04] (cgar)
April 1, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [602-1] motion by Infineon for Jeanne Marie Heffernam to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72694 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
March 31, 2004 Filing 607 RESPONSE by Infineon to [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus (Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
March 31, 2004 Filing 606 REPLY by Infineon to response to [567-1] motion to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (Exhibit E Filed under SEAL) (cgar)
March 30, 2004 Filing 605 Memorandum on subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (scoo)
March 26, 2004 Filing 604 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for arguments on motions. (snea)
March 26, 2004 Filing 603 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [567-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-T Filed Under Seal) (cgar)
March 25, 2004 Filing 602 MOTION by Infineon for Jeanne Marie Heffernam to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72694 (cgar)
March 24, 2004 Filing 601 Statement regarding late produced documents in support of Response by defendant Infineon, [543-1] motion response to Rambus's Motion to Strike Sections 2,2 and 2,3 of the second supplemental report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental report of Dennis W. Carlton (Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits A,B,C,D,E,H and J Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits F, G, I placed in brown expandable) Inc., Infineon, Infineon (cgar)
March 23, 2004 Filing 600 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honrable Robert E. Payne on date of 3/23/4 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 599 ORDER that it is hereby SCHEDULED for 3/26/04 at 10:00 am; the Motion to Strike Portions of Second Supplemental Expert Report of Mr. McAlexander and Entire Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Carlton of plaintiff; the Motion for Supplemental Expert Reports Pertaining to the Claim Terms Read Request and First and Second External Clock Signals of plaintiff; and the Motion to Strike the Industry Royalty Rates Section of the Supplemental Expert Report Submitted by Dr. Teece of defts; argument shall also be heard on plaintiff's pending Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) or in Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning Defts' Counterclaim 15; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
March 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 598 ORDER that the parties shall file papers address the topic of subject matter waiver as it pertains to the attorney-client work product privileges on the following: plaintiff shall file its memorandum addressing the issue by 3/30/04; defts shall file a response by 4/6/04; plaintiff may file a reply by 4/9/04; a hearing on the issue shall be held on 4/15/04 at 8:00 am; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
March 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 597 ORDER that defts by 3/24/04 shall submit the requested supplemental materials respecting the motions pertaining to expert reports; defts shall supplement its materials to specify precisely what it means by the phrase "newly produced" materials and precisely what "newly produced" materials it is referring to in its papers; in addition, the defts shall send a cpoy of this supplementaion by facsimile directly to the Court; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
March 23, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 596 ORDER that the hearing re: the Motion to dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) or in Alternative Motion for Partial summary Judgment concerning Defts' Counterclaim 15 of the Plaintiff, currently scheduled for 3/26/04 at 2:00 pm is hereby rescheduled to 3/26/04 at 10:00 am; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
March 23, 2004 Filing 595 TRANSCRIPT of Motion to Compel Hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 03/16/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 23, 2004 Oral Argument Hearing as to Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. on Subject Matter Waiver set 8:00 4/15/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 23, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) set at 10:00 3/26/04, [520-2] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 set at 10:00 3/26/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 22, 2004 Filing 594 MEMORANDUM in support of [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits 1-26 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 22, 2004 Filing 593 MOTION to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
March 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 591 ORDER the jury trial currently scheduled for May 10, 2004 is CONTINUED until June 10, 2004 at 9:30AM; Jury selection shall begin on June 10, 2004 at 9:30 AM; Opening arguments shall commence on June 11, 2004 at 9:00 AM; the presentation of evidence shall commence on June 14, 2004 at 9:00AM; the Final PTC currently scheduled for April 29, 2004 is CONTINUED GENERALLY; a date certain will be determined at a later time ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/18/04] (cgar)
March 18, 2004 USCA Federal Circuit LETTER a petiton for writ of mandamus has been filed (Misc. No. 762 - In Re Rambus Inc) (cgar)
March 17, 2004 Filing 592 USCA Federal Circuit Order Rambus, Inc. submits a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the USDC for the Eastern District ofVirginia to vacate its order that requires Rambus to disclose certain documents that Rambus asserts are privileged; Infineon is directed to respond within 14 days of date of filing (cgar)
March 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 590 AMENDED ORDER for the reasons stated in the accompanying Amended Memorandum Opinion, the Motion to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus' Privilege Log of the Defendants (Docket No. 490) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the Dfts' request for an order finding a waiver of all privileges by virtue of the inadequacy of Rambus' log, however, is DENIED; Rambus is ORDERED to produce to the Dfts any documents it produced in the Hynix or FTC ligitagion that are covered by the March 7 Order; Rambus is ORDERED to produce the twenty-seven documents that fall within the reach of the March 7 Order that is has never disclosed previously; the Motion to Compel Production of Documents Relating to Rambus' Document Retentin Policy of the Dfts (Docket No. 492) is RETAINED UNDER CONSIDERATION pending completion of the in camera review ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/18/04] (cgar)
March 17, 2004 Filing 589 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar) Modified on 03/18/2004
March 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 588 ORDER the February 26 Opinion and the Order implementing it (Docket No. 536) are vacated and that the Amended Memorandum Opinion and Amended Order issued herewith shall be file to replace them; DENIED AS MOOT (547-1) by Rambus without prejudice to the filing of motion for stay of any subsequent order issued following completion of the pending in camera review of priviledged documents; it is further ORDERED that oral argument on the motion for say set for March 26, 2004 at 2:00 p.m. is cancelled; but the Court will hear oral argument on Rambus' Motion to Dismiss (Rule 12 (b) (6)) or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment (Rule 56 (b) Concerning Infineon's Counterclaim Count 15, Based on Califronia Bus & Prof. Code 17200 at that time ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 3/17/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 3/18/04] (cgar)
March 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 586 ORDER that for the reasons stated on the record on 3/16/04, the plaintiff may file a motion addressing whether it has established a prima facie showing that the defts engaged in spoliation; the following schedule shall controlb riefing: plaintiff shall file its motion and memo addressing the issue by 3/22/04; defts shall file a response by 3/31/04; defts shall file any reply by 4/6/04; a hearing on the issue shall be held on 4/15/04 at 8:00 am ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom)
March 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 585 ORDER denying [545-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of Documents in Response to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things, denying [537-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to the extent to Compel Infineon to Witnesses for Depositions, granting [537-2] motion by Rambus, Inc. to the extent for a rule 26(f) conference, thus, a Rule 26(f) conference was held during the hearing of 3/16/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom)
March 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 584 ORDER that oral argument on the Motion to Stay the Order Provisions of the Second Paragraph of the Court's Order of 2/26/04 of the plaintiff, as well as the Motion to Dismiss or, in Alternatiave for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning Defts' Counterclaim 15 shall be held on 3/26/04 at 2:00 pm; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom) Modified on 03/17/2004
March 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 583 STIPULATED ORDER that the Court's 2/26/04 Order compels Rambus to produce to defts any documents it produced in the Hynix or FTC litigations that are coered by the 3/7/01 Order and the twenty-seven documents that fallw ithin the reach of the 3/7/01 Order that it has never disclosed previously; ....See Order for Details... ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom) Modified on 03/17/2004
March 17, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus set at 2:00 3/26/04, [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) set at 2:00 3/26/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 16, 2004 Filing 587 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Counsel for the parties advised the Court regarding agreements they have reached concerning discovery matters. Argreements stated on the record for the Court. (snea)
March 16, 2004 Filing 582 Stipulation RE Use of Previously Produced Documents in Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies, AG, et al. filed by Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology (khan)
March 16, 2004 Filing 581 Minute entry: Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Arguments had on Plaintiff's Motions to Compel. Motions denied. (snea)
March 15, 2004 Filing 580 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 4 (Joint Exhibits placed in brown expandable) Proposed Order placed on left (cgar) Modified on 03/16/2004
March 15, 2004 Filing 579 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 3 (Joint Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 15, 2004 Filing 578 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 2 (Joint Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 15, 2004 Filing 577 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine (Joint Exhibits A-E placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 03/16/2004
March 15, 2004 Filing 576 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (cgar)
March 15, 2004 Filing 575 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [574-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 574 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 573 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [572-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 572 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 571 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon to [547-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Stay of the Ordering Provisions of the Second Paragaph of the Court's 02/26/04 Order (Exhibits 1-12 placed in brown expandable) (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 570 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [569-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 569 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 568 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [567-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (Exhibits A-D and Exhibit C SEALED) (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 567 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 566 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [565-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 565 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision (scoo)
March 15, 2004 Filing 564 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 03/03/04 (cgar)
March 12, 2004 Filing 563 REPLY by Infineon to response to [541-1] motion by Infineon to Strike the Industry Royalty rates section of the Supplemental Expert Report of Prof. David J. Teece (Exhibits 4-8 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 11, 2004 Filing 562 Declaration of Gregory P. Stone in Support of the consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of Motions to Compel Infineon to Produce Witness for Deposition and to Produce Documents by Rambus, Inc. [561-1] response reply (cgar)
March 11, 2004 Filing 561 CONSOLIDATED REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [545-1] motion to Compel the Production of Documents in Response to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things, [537-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Infineon to Produce Witnesses for Deposition (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-Y SEALED) (cgar)
March 10, 2004 Filing 560 RESPONSE (List of Proposed Deponents) by Infineon to [551-1] order (cgar)
March 9, 2004 Filing 559 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [541-1] motion by Infineon to Strike the Industry Royalty rates section of the Supplemental Expert Report of Prof. David J. Teece (Declaration of Sean P. Gates attached) (cgar)
March 9, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [553-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Sarah Kurtin to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72415 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 3/8/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
March 9, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [552-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Catherine Florence Augustson to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72414 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
March 9, 2004 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [545-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of Documents inResponse to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things set at 9:00 3/16/04, [537-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Infineon to Produce Witnesses for Deposition set at 9:00 3/16/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 8, 2004 Filing 558 RESPONSE (List of Proposed Deponents) by Rambus, Inc. to the Court's Order of March 5, 2004 (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS A-T FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 8, 2004 Filing 557 Declaration of John M. Desmarais in Support of Infineons' [556-1] to motion response (Compel) by Infineon [555-1] motion (Compel) response by Infineon (cgar)
March 8, 2004 Filing 556 RESPONSE by Infineon to [537-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Infineon to Produce Witnesses for Deposition (Joint Appendix of Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 8, 2004 Filing 555 RESPONSE by Infineon to [545-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of Documents inResponse to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Joint Appendix of Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 5, 2004 Filing 554 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6), [520-2] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 (cgar)
March 5, 2004 Filing 553 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Sarah Kurtin to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72415 (cgar)
March 5, 2004 Filing 552 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Catherine Florence Augustson to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72414 (cgar)
March 5, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 551 ORDER the parties shall file a list of proposed deponents in which they identify the deponents and provide a brief description of the topics (s) on which the party intends to examine the witness; the pltf shalll file its list of proposed deponents on 03/08/04 and the dfts shall file there list of prposed deponents on 3/10/04 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 3/5/04] (cgar)
March 5, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 550 ORDER the Dfts shall file a response by 03/08/04; Pltf shall file any reply before noon on 03/11/04; there will be a hearing on the matters at 9:00 am on 03/16/04 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 3/4/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/5/04] (cgar)
March 4, 2004 Filing 546 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [545-1] motion to Compel the Production of Documents in Response to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Declaration of Gregory P. Stone placed in brown expandable) (Proposed Order placed on left) (cgar)
March 3, 2004 Filing 549 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [527-1] motion to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental Report of Dennis W. Carlton (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 3, 2004 Filing 548 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [547-1] motion to Stay of the Ordering Provisions of the Second Paragaph of the Court's 02/26/04 Order (Proposed Order Recv'd and placed on left) (cgar)
March 3, 2004 Filing 547 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Stay of the Ordering Provisions of the Second Paragaph of the Court's 02/26/04 Order (cgar) Modified on 03/04/2004
March 3, 2004 Filing 545 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of Documents inResponse to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (cgar)
March 2, 2004 Filing 544 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [531-1] second amended counter claim by Infineon Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cmcc)
February 27, 2004 Filing 543 RESPONSE by Infineon to [527-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental Report of Dennis W. Carlton (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS 1-8 SEALED) (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Filing 542 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [541-1] motion Strike the Industry Royalty rates section of the Supplemental Expert Report of Prof. David J. Teece (Exhibits 1-3 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Filing 541 MOTION by Infineon to Strike the Industry Royalty rates section of the Supplemental Expert Report of Prof. David J. Teece (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Filing 540 RESPONSE (in Opppsition) by Infineon to [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) by Rambus, Inc., [520-2]for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 (Exhibits A-F placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Filing 539 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [517-1] Opposition re: order response (Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Expert Report on the Terms "First External Clock Signal" and "Second External Clock Signal" by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Filing 538 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [537-1] motion to Compel Infineon to Produce Witnesses for Deposition, [537-2] motion by Rambus, Inc. for a rule 26(f) conference to established the parameters of permissible discovery prior to the retrial in this action (Proposed Order Recv'd and placed on left) (Declaration of Gregory P. Stone (with attached exhibits A-O placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Filing 537 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Infineon to Produce Witnesses for Deposition , and by Rambus, Inc. for a rule 26(f) conference to established the parameters of permissible discovery prior to the retrial in this aciton (cgar)
February 27, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [532-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Martin Douglas Bern to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72215 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 2/26/04) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 536 (VACATED PER ORDER ENTERED 03/17/04) ORDER granting in part, denying in part [490-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log, the Defts' request for an order finding a waiver of all privileges by virtue of the inadequacy of Rambus' log, is DENIED; furthrmore, because it voluntarily disclosed before the first trial in this action, Rambus is ORDERED to produced to the Dfts any documents it produced in teh Hynix or FTC litigations that are covered by the March 7 Order; Rambus is ORDERED to produce the twenty-seven documents that fall within the reach of the March 7 Order that is has never disclosed previously; GRANTING IN PART AND RETAINED UNDER CONSIDERATION pending completion of the in camera review [492-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production;Rambus is ORDERED to produce immedately any documents that contain information about or relate to the creation, preparation, or scope of its document retention policy ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/27/04] (cgar) Modified on 03/18/2004
February 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 535 (VACATED PER ORDER ENTERED 3/17/4) MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar) Modified on 03/18/2004
February 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 534 ORDER the Clerk to unseal Exhibits 25 & 26 (dkt #493) and 37,40,41,42 (dkt #506) of the Joint Appendix of Exhibits in Support of the Motion to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus' Privilege Log and to Compel Production of Docuents Related to Rambus' Document Retention, Collection, and Production of Infineon ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/27/04] (cgar) Modified on 02/27/2004
February 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 533 ORDER the Clerk is to substitute the accompanying pages 4-7, 17-18, and 34 for those corresponding pages in the 02/18/04 Memorandum Opinion (dkt #523) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/27/04] (cgar) Modified on 02/27/2004
February 25, 2004 Filing 532 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Martin Douglas Bern to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72215 (cgar)
February 25, 2004 Filing 531 REVISED SECOND AMENDED (ANSWER) AND COUNTERCLAIM by defendant Infineon to Rambus' First Amended Complaint; jury demand (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 25, 2004 Filing 530 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. in support of [529-1] motion by Infineon Corp., Infineon Holding, Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to clarify footnote 2 of the Court's Feb. 18, 2004 Memorandum Opinion (kste)
February 25, 2004 Filing 529 MOTION by Infineon Corp., Infineon Holding, Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to clarify (footnote 2 of the Court's Feb. 18, 2004 Memorandum Opinion) (kste)
February 20, 2004 Filing 528 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [527-1] motion to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental Report of Dennis W. Carlton (Exhibits placed in brown expandable (EXHIBITS F & G SEALED) (cgar)
February 20, 2004 Filing 527 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental Report of Dennis W. Carlton (cgar)
February 20, 2004 Filing 526 Response (in Opposition) by Infineon to [517-1] order response ( Titled: "Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Expert Report on the Terms "First External Clock Signal" and "Second External Clock Signal"" by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 20, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [525-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Sean Paul Gates to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72129 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 2/19/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 19, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [519-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Christian Chadd Taylor to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72113 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 2/18/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 18, 2004 Filing 525 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Sean Paul Gates to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72129 (cgar)
February 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 524 ORDER granting [500-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Leave to File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims; in conformance with the instructions in the Mem. Opinion, Infineon shall file and serve its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims on 2/25/04 and Rambus shall file and serve its Answer on 3/2/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 2/18/04] (thom)
February 18, 2004 Filing 523 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (thom)
February 17, 2004 Filing 522 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to Defts' Second Amended Counterclaims (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
February 17, 2004 Filing 521 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) by Rambus, Inc., [520-2] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 (EXHIBITS A-F FILED UNDER SEAL) (proposed order recd and placed on left) (scoo) Modified on 02/18/2004
February 17, 2004 Filing 520 MOTION by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) , or in the alternative by Rambus, Inc.for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 (scoo)
February 17, 2004 Filing 519 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Christian Chadd Taylor to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72113 (scoo)
February 13, 2004 Filing 518 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Expert Reports by Infineon (Exhibit B filed under seal) (cgar) Modified on 02/13/2004
February 13, 2004 Filing 517 RESPONSE (Opening Memorandum in Support of Supplemental Expert Reports) by Rambus, Inc. (exhibits A-E placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 12, 2004 Filing 516 NOTICE of Lodging of Revised Privilege Log by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 9, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [515-1] motion by Infineon for Michael Peter Stadnick to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71993 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 02/06/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 6, 2004 Filing 515 MOTION by Infineon for Michael Peter Stadnick to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71993 (cgar)
February 6, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [513-1] motion by Infineon for Paul Arthur Bondor to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71942 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 1/6/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 5, 2004 Filing 514 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 02/2/04 (cgar) .
February 4, 2004 Filing 513 MOTION by Infineon for Paul Arthur Bondor to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71942 (cgar)
February 3, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [510-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon for Scott Richard Samay to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71840 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
February 2, 2004 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [509-1] motion by Infineon for Steven Jon Lever to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71824, granting [508-1] motion by Infineon for Michael Aaron Fisher to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71824, granting [507-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Kelly Max Klaus to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71787 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 02/01/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
January 30, 2004 Filing 512 REPLY by Infineon to response to [500-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims Pursuant to Rule 15(A) fo the FRCivP (exhibits placed in brown expandable (EXHIBITS 6 AND 7 PLACED UNDER SEAL)) (cgar)
January 30, 2004 Filing 511 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [503-1] order Titled: " NOTICE of Lodging of Privileged Documents Pursuant to Order of 01/28/04" (cgar)
January 30, 2004 Filing 510 MOTION by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon for Scott Richard Samay to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71840 (cgar)
January 29, 2004 Filing 509 MOTION by Infineon for Steven Jon Lever to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71824 (cgar)
January 29, 2004 Filing 508 MOTION by Infineon for Michael Aaron Fisher to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71824 (cgar)
January 28, 2004 Filing 507 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Kelly Max Klaus to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 71787 (cgar)
January 28, 2004 Filing 506 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon to response to [492-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS ATTACHED, EXHIBITS 37 - 42 SEALED) Per Order (dkt #534) entered 02/26/04 exhibits 37, 40, 41, and 42 are UNSEALED ) (scoo) Modified on 02/27/2004
January 28, 2004 Filing 505 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon to response to [490-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (scoo)
January 28, 2004 Filing 504 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [500-1] motion by Infineon, Infineonfor Leave to File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims (Exhibits A-D, Exhibits A and B SEALED) (scoo)
January 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 503 ORDER that Rambus, Inc. is ORDERED to deliver to the Court for in camera inspection all documents as to which Rambus, Inc. is claiming the attorney-client or work product privilege. Rambus, Inc. shall deliver these documents to the chambers of the undersigned no later than 5:00 p.m. 1/30/04. In producing these documents for in camera review, Rambus, Inc. shall separate out and make readily identifiable those 24 documents listed on its updated privilege log that it recognizes as falling within the 3/7/01 Order of this Court (dkt #164). ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed and faxed: yes [EOD Date: 1/28/04] (khan)
January 23, 2004 Filing 502 Preliminary Witness list by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
January 20, 2004 Filing 501 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon in support of [500-1] motion by Infineon, Infineonfor Leave to File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo) Modified on 01/20/2004
January 20, 2004 Filing 500 MOTION by Infineon, Infineonfor Leave to File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims (scoo)
January 20, 2004 Filing 499 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [492-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production (exhibits in brown expandable, Exhibits 6, 7, and 10 SEALED) (scoo)
January 20, 2004 Filing 498 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [490-1] motion by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (exhibits in brown expandable, Exhibit #17 SEALED) (scoo)
January 15, 2004 Filing 497 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 01/14/04 (placed in brown expadable) (cgar)
January 14, 2004 Filing 496 TRANSCRIPT for date of January 8, 2004 hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne. (thom)
January 13, 2004 Draft Pretrial Order rec'd and presented to Judge (thom)
January 8, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 495 ORDER denying [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trial pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 1/8/04] (thom)
January 8, 2004 Filing 494 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Arguments had on the Defendants' Motion for a Stay. Motion denied. Court reviewed with counsel issues to be addressed at the retrial of this case. (snea) Modified on 01/08/2004
January 5, 2004 Filing 493 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [492-1] motion to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production (Joint Appendix of Exhibits placed in brown expandable (Exhibits 21-24 and 28-29 are SEALED) (Proposed Order received and placed on left) (EXHIBITS 26 AND 26 UNSEALED PER ORDER ENTERED 02/26/04 (DKT #534) (cgar) Modified on 02/27/2004
January 5, 2004 Filing 492 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony relating to Rambus's Document Retention, Collection and Production (cgar)
January 5, 2004 Filing 491 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [490-1] motion to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (Proposed Order received and placed on left) (cgar)
January 5, 2004 Filing 490 MOTION by Infineon to Compel Production of Documents Listed on Rambus's Privilege Log (cgar)
December 15, 2003 Filing 489 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. regarding privilege claims pursuant to [468-1] Court's 11/05/03 order (cgar)
December 12, 2003 Filing 488 Reply by Infineon to [484-1] Brief regarding the issues and claims that are appropriate subjects for further proceedings by Rambus, Inc. (Exhibits 1-6 placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 12/12/2003
December 12, 2003 Filing 487 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to [483-1] Response Brief regarding issues and claims appropriate for further proceedings by Infineon (cgar)
December 8, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 486 ORDER the Simultaneous Reply Memoranda of the Pltfs and the Dfts, originally ordered to be filed by 12/08/03, must be filed by 12/12/03 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 12/05/03 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/8/03] (cgar)
December 5, 2003 Filing 485 REPLY by Infineon to response to [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus (cgar)
December 4, 2003 Filing 484 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [475-1] Brief Regarding Issues and Claims that are Appropriate Subjects for further Proceedings by Infineon Inc. (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
December 4, 2003 Filing 483 Response by Infineon to [472-1] Opening Memorandum Regarding Issues and Claims that are Appropriate Subjects for Further Proceedings by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
December 4, 2003 Motion hearing [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus set at 9:00 1/8/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (lmcd)
November 26, 2003 Filing 478 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 25, 2003 Filing 482 JUDGMENT OF USCA Federal Circuit Re:appeals, affirmed-in part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded issued as a mandate 11/21/03 (cgar)
November 25, 2003 Filing 481 Opinion of USCA Federal Circuit re: Appeal decided 01/29/03 the district court's decision is vacated-in-part, reversed-in-part, affirmed-in-part and REMANDED (cgar)
November 25, 2003 Filing 480 USCA Federal Circuit Order the petition for panel rehearing be is DENIED and it is further ORDERED that the petion for rehearing en ban be, is DENIED; the mandate of the court will issue on APRIL 11, 2003 (cgar)
November 25, 2003 Filing 479 USCA Federal Circuit Order the motion to stay the mandate is GRANTED (cgar)
November 24, 2003 Filing 477 Joint STATUS REPORT regarding areas of Agreement and Disagreement with respect to identification of infringing products by Rambus, Inc. and Infineon (cgar)
November 18, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 476 ORDER the jury trial in this matter is SCHEDULED to commence on May 10, 2004 at 9:30; the Final Pretrial Conference is SCHEDULED for April 29, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/18/03] (cgar)
November 18, 2003 Jury Trial set at 9:30 5/10/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
November 14, 2003 Filing 475 Brief filed by defendant Infineon regarding the claims and issues remaining before the Court (Exhibits A-N placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 11/14/2003
November 14, 2003 Filing 474 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus (Exhibits A-M placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
November 14, 2003 Filing 473 MOTION by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus (cgar)
November 14, 2003 Filing 472 Opening Memorandum filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. regarding issues and claims that are appropriate subjects for further proceedings (cgar)
November 13, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 471 ORDER that the conference call scheduled for Nov. 4 and Nov. 14 at 4:00 p.m. is CONTINUED until Nov. 17, 2003 at 5:00 p.m., furthermore, the hearing scheduled in paragraph 3 of the Order of 11/4/03 for Dec. 11, 2003 at 1:30 is CONTINUED until Jan. 8, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/13/03] (scoo)
November 6, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 470 ORDER that the defts' Bill of Costs and Amended Bill of Costs are denied without prejudice to the filing of any claims for costs as to which the defts may be entitled due to furture proceedings herein ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facimile [EOD Date: 11/6/03] (cgar)
November 6, 2003 Status Conference set at 10:00 1/8/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
November 6, 2003 Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order set at 1:30 12/11/03 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
November 5, 2003 Filing 469 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 10/31/03 (cgar)
November 5, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 468 ORDER that 1- the parties shall file, on the following schedule, briefs respecting the defts' proposal for a stay of this action, which is opposed by the pltf, pending resolution of In the Matter of Rambus, now before the Federal Trade Commission: Nov. 14, 2003, Infineon Motion to Stay (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/5/03] (scoo)
October 31, 2003 Filing 467 Minute entry: Payne, J., Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a status conference. Counsel for the parties addressed discovery matters, briefing and other matters with the Court. The Court will enter an order setting a briefing schedule. Counsel to tender to the Court an updated list of counsel of record. (snea) Modified on 11/05/2003
October 31, 2003 Status Conference held (snea)
October 30, 2003 Status Conference set at 9:30 10/31/03 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 28, 2003 Filing 466 Proposed Agenda for 10/31/03 Status Conference filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (thom)
October 27, 2003 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [463-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Peter Andrew Detre to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 70464 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cmcc)
October 27, 2003 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [464-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Gregory Paul Stone to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 70464 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cmcc)
October 24, 2003 Filing 465 TRANSCRIPT of telephone conference for date of 10/22/03 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (cgar)
October 23, 2003 Filing 464 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Gregory Paul Stone to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 70464 (cgar)
October 23, 2003 Filing 463 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Peter Andrew Detre to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 70464 (cgar)
April 25, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 462 ORDER granting [461-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to relinquish original Letter of Credit and Supersedeas Bond (Original Bond and Letter of Credit sent to Christian & Barton) copy of both pleadings placed in case file ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/25/03] (scoo)
April 22, 2003 Filing 461 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to relinquish original Letter of Credit (scoo)
April 17, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 460 ORDER granting [459-1] motion to Release superseadeas Bond and Letter of Credit by Rambus, Inc. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 04/16/03 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/17/03] (cgar)
April 16, 2003 Filing 459 MOTION to Release superseadeas Bond and Letter of Credit by Rambus, Inc. (Order presented) (cgar)
February 13, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 458 ORDER having conferred w/ counsel for the parties on the record on 2/7/03, it appears that the Dfts will file a petition for rehearing en banc in the USCA for the Federal Circuit and that the mandate of that Court is thereby stayed and therefore it is hereby ORDERED that counsel are instructed to apprise of any development that will necessitate further action by this Court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/13/03] (cgar)
February 3, 2003 Case reopened per chambers (scoo)
February 3, 2003 Filing 457 Opinion of USCA Federal Circuit decided 1/29/03 affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part and REMANDED (cgar) Modified on 02/06/2003
September 26, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 456 ORDER granting [450-1] motion by American Lawyer to Intervene by American Lawyer and to unseal court papers, granting [449-1] motion to Intervene by American Lawyer ( for the limited purpose of unsealing court papers; and, it is further ORDERED that the sealed memorandum of law and related court papers filed in connection w/ Infineon's request for attorneys' fees and expenses, enterd at docket #s 350, 356, 360, 361 and 368 are hereby UNSEALED; and it is further ORDERED that the sealed memorandum of law by Infineon in support of its Motion for Certain Attorneys' Fees and Expenses and related papers entered at docket #342, w/ exception of the Declaration of Clifford E. Wilkins In Support of Infineon's Motion for Certain Attorneys' Fees and Expenses, including all exhibits attached thereto are hereby UNSEALED;and, it is further ORDERED that the Wilkins Declaration, including all exhibits attached thereto shall remain SEALED signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 9/25/02 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 9/26/02] (cgar)
September 19, 2002 Filing 455 Joint Stipulations filed by Infineon et al, and American Lawyer (Sketch Order placed on left) (cgar)
September 16, 2002 Filing 454 RESPONSE (NON-OPPOSITION) by Rambus, Inc. to [450-1] motion by American Lawyer to Intervene and to unseal court papers (cgar)
September 6, 2002 Filing 453 MOTION by American Lawyer for Robert Andrew Feinberg to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt #65069 (cgar) Modified on 09/06/2002
September 6, 2002 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [453-1] motion by American Lawyer for Robert Andrew Feinberg to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt #65069 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
September 4, 2002 Filing 452 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by American Lawyer (cgar)
September 4, 2002 Filing 451 MEMORANDUM by American Lawyer in support of [450-1] motion to Intervene by American Lawyer and to unseal court papers (cgar)
September 4, 2002 Filing 450 MOTION by American Lawyer to Intervene by American Lawyer and to unseal court papers (cgar)
September 4, 2002 Filing 449 MOTION to Intervene by American Lawyer (cgar)
July 1, 2002 Filing 448 Reply by Infineon et al. to [447-1] objection by Rambus, Inc. to Deft's Amended Bill of Costs (cgar)
June 17, 2002 Filing 447 OBJECTION by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to [446-1] Defts' Amended Bill of Costs (cgar)
May 15, 2002 Filing 446 AMENDED Bill of Costs by Infineon, et al. (Declarations of Matsil and Riopelle attached; Declaration of Wilkins in black binder all FILED UNDER SEAL) (rpiz) Modified on 05/16/2002
April 16, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 445 ORDER that, by May 15, 2002, the dfts shall file a detailed statement setting forth full and complete support for the recoverability of each item claimed...By June 17, 2002, the plft may file any renewed objections, and the dfts may file any response thereto by July 1, 2002 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 4/15/02 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/16/02] (cgar)
March 18, 2002 Filing 444 USCA Federal Circuit Order as to defendant Infineon's cross-appeal it is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute (cgar)
March 18, 2002 Cross-Appeal Filing Fee Paid by Infineon; FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 62734 (USCA Federal Circuit #02-1174) (cgar)
February 11, 2002 USCA LETTER re critical dates for counsel, pro se parties, and the court (Appeal 11/27/01) (cgar)
February 6, 2002 USCA for the Federal Circuit Case Number Re: [443-1] cross-appeal by Infineon Holding, et al. USCA NUMBER: 02-1174 (cgar)
February 6, 2002 USCA FEDERAL CIRCUIT LETTER re: critical dates for counsel, pro se parties, and the court (Appeal 12/10/01) (cgar) Modified on 02/12/2002
December 11, 2001 Copy of Notice of Cross- Appeal, Judgment and docket sheet to FCCA: [443-1] Notice of Appeal by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon (lsal)
December 10, 2001 Case closed per chambers (scoo) Modified on 10/07/2004
December 10, 2001 Filing 443 NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL OF [439-1] order by Infineon et al, No fee paid, TPO package mailed. (cgar)
November 27, 2001 Filing 442 NOTICE OF APPEAL OF [439-1] order by Rambus, Inc. FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT #61251 ;TPO package given (cgar) Modified on 11/27/2001
November 26, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 441 ORDER granting [432-1] motion by Infineon et al for an Order rescinding the reqirement that Infineon Post a Bond for the Permanent Injunction;it is hereby ORDERED that the requirement in the Proposed Order of Permanent Injunction, which accompanied the Memorandum Opinion respecting the request for a permanent injunction, both of which were dated 8/9/01 is hereby rescinded and the Clerk is authorized to refund the bond posted on 8/16/01 herein by Infineon in the amount of $1,000,000.00 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/27/01] (cgar)
November 26, 2001 Filing 440 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
November 26, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 439 ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION that Rambus and its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns, are hereby permanetly enjoined from initiating or prosecuting any lawsuit or any other proceeding against Infineon in, or through which, Rambus asserts that any of Infineon's single data rate SDRAM products or double data rate SDRAM products, including the accused SDRAM products in this case, that conform to ..."The JEDEC STANDARDS" ...This Order of Permanent Injunction shall take effect at the date and time entered (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne at 5:25 p.m. on 11/26/01 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/27/01] (cgar)
November 15, 2001 Filing 438 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Hon. Robert E. Payne for date of 8/20/01 (cgar)
November 9, 2001 Filing 437 TRANSCRIPT of Hearing before the Hon. Robert E. Payne for date of 11/2/01 (cgar)
November 2, 2001 Filing 436 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for Oral Arguments on Defendant's Motion for an Injunction. Arguments had. Motion taken under adivsement by the Court. (snea)
October 23, 2001 Filing 435 Reply by Infineon et al, on the Appropriate Scope of Injunctive Relief to Remedy Rambus' Fraud [431-1] by Rambus, Inc. (Proposed Order placed on left) (EXHIBITS IN BROWN EXPANDABLE) (cgar) Modified on 10/24/2001
October 22, 2001 Filing 434 RESPONSE (of Non-Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [432-1] motion by Infineon et al for an Order rescinding the reqirement that Infineon post a Bond for the Permanent Injunction (cgar)
October 18, 2001 Filing 431 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [430-1] brief by Infineon on the Appropriate Scope of Injunctive Relief (Proposed Orders Placed on left) (EXHIBITS IN BROWN ENVELOPE - SEALED) (cgar)
October 17, 2001 Filing 433 MEMORANDUM by Infineon et al in support of [432-1] motion for an Order rescinding the reqirement that Infineon Post a Bond for the Permanent Injunction (cgar) Modified on 10/23/2001
October 17, 2001 Filing 432 MOTION by Infineon et al for an Order rescinding the reqirement that Infineon Post a Bond for the Permanent Injunction (cgar) Modified on 10/23/2001
October 12, 2001 Filing 430 Brief by Infineon et al on the Appropriate scope of Injunctive relief to remedy Rambus' Fraud (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 10/12/2001
October 10, 2001 Filing 429 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 10/8/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Vol. II) (cgar)
October 10, 2001 Filing 428 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 10/8/01 before theHonorable Robert E. Payen (Volume I) (cgar)
October 9, 2001 Filing 427 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 10/8/01 before the Hon Robert E. Payne (Volume III) (cgar)
October 9, 2001 Filing 426 TRANSCRIPT for date of 08/20/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Conference Call) (cgar)
October 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 425 ORDER the oral argument respecting the scope of the injunction granted on 8/9/01..., is rescheduled for 11/2/01 at 1:30 p.m. The briefing schedule shall be as follows: (1) Infineon shall file its opening brief by 10/12/01; (2) Rambus shall file its response brief by 10/18/01; and (3) Infineon shall file any reply brief by 10/23/01. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/9/01] (cgar)
October 8, 2001 Filing 424 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Diane Daffron, OCR., Tracy Stroh, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. The Court reporters took testimony at dirrent times to releive each other. Matter came on for an Evidentiary Hearing. Opening Statements made. Defendant adduced evidence; rested. Plaintiffs' adduced evidence; rested. Evidence concluded. Deposition testimony read into record. Court will allow additional briefing on these issues. Oral Arguments to be held on November 02, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. An Order setting forth the briefing schedule will enter. (snea) Modified on 10/08/2001
October 8, 2001 Oral Arguments set at 1:30 11/2/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 2, 2001 Evidentiary Hearing set at 9:00 10/8/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 1, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 423 ORDER that the evidentiary hearing on Infineon's request for an injunction is rescheduled to October 8, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. It is further ORDERED that the parties will each file briefs in support of their respective positions no later than 12:30 p.m. on October 10, 2001 and that oral argument will be held October 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed and faxed: y [EOD Date: 10/1/01] (khan)
September 28, 2001 Filing 422 NOTICE of Docketing (cgar)
September 28, 2001 USCA Federal Circuit Case Number Re: [418-1] cross-appeal by Infineon et al., USCA NUMBER: 01-1641 (cgar)
September 27, 2001 Filing 421 List of Issues for Evidentiary Hearing filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
September 26, 2001 Filing 420 Statement of Issues to be tried at the Evidentiary Hearing on the Scope of Injunctive Relief filed by defendants Infineon et al (cgar)
September 25, 2001 Evidentiary Hearing set at 9:00 9/28/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
September 24, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 419 ORDER that evidentiary hearing on Infineon's request for injunction is rescheduled from 9-29-01 to 9-28-01 at 9:00 a.m. continuing on 9-29-01 until 12:00 noon if necessary ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and faxed. [EOD Date: 9/24/01] (clerk)
September 20, 2001 Defendants' Notice of Cross-Appeal Filing Fee Paid; FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 60440 (cgar)
September 19, 2001 Filing 418 NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL OF [409-1] order, [332-1] order, [398-1] order, [399-1] order by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon. No fee paid, no TPO package given (Federal Circuit) (cgar)
September 17, 2001 Evidentiary Hearing set at 9:00 9/29/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
September 14, 2001 Filing 417 OBJECTION by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to Bill of Costs [414-1] by Infineon et al. (cgar)
September 14, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 416 ORDER the evidentiary hearing respecting the scope of the injunction is rescheduled for 9/29/01 at 9:00 a.m.; the parties shall exchange copies of all demonstrative exhibits and lists of issues to be addressed at the eidentiary hearing, and shall file the same with the Court, by 9/26/01; the post-hearing briefing schedule shall be as follows: (1) Infineon shall file its opening brief by 10/4/01; (2) Rambus shall file its response brief by 10/8/01 and (3) Infineon shall file its reply brief by 10/10/01 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 9/14/01] (cgar)
September 11, 2001 USCA FEDERAL CIRCUIT LETTER re: critical dates for counsel, pro se parties, and the court (cgar)
September 4, 2001 Filing 415 TRANSCRIPT of telephone conference for date of 4/6/01 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (rpiz)
September 4, 2001 Filing 414 Bill of costs in the by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holdin (Declaration of Gregory Arovas, Ira Matsil and Brian Riopelle attached to Bill of Cost and FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo) Modified on 09/05/2001
August 29, 2001 Transcript requested [410-1] appeal by Rambus, Inc., [402-1] appeal by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
August 29, 2001 Copy of Notice of Appeal, Judgment and docket sheet to USCA: [410-1] appeal by Rambus, Inc. (lsal)
August 28, 2001 Filing 413 RELEASED PER ORDER ENTERED ON 4/17/03 Supersedeas Bond $ 7,735,580.00 by Rambus, Inc. with Attached LETTER OF CREDIT issued by UBS/PaineWebber in the amount of $7,735,580.00, approved by U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne (scoo) Modified on 04/24/2003
August 28, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 412 ORDER granting [411-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for approval of Supersedeas Bond and Letter of Credit ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/28/01] (scoo)
August 28, 2001 Filing 411 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for approval of Supersedeas Bond and Letter of Credit (scoo)
August 28, 2001 Received Supersedeas Bond and Letter of Credit (sent to chambers for approval) (scoo)
August 22, 2001 Filing 410 NOTICE OF APPEAL OF [409-1] order by Rambus, Inc. FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 60099. TPO package mailed. (cgar)
August 22, 2001 Evidentiary Hearing set at 9:30 9/24/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
August 21, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 409 ORDER (JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE): 1 The provisions of paragraphs 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 11 of the JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE entered on 5/30/01 are certified as final orders under FRCP 54(b); 2 paragraph 10 of the JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE is vacated; the verdict on Count 11 of the defendants' counterclaim is set aside; it is ORDERED that the defendants shall take nothing of the plaintiff on account of Count 11 of the defendants' counterclaim; and the provisions of this paragraph are certified as a final order under FRCP 54(b); 3 all other provisions of the Order on the judgment as a matter of law (#398) are certified as final orders under FRCP 54(b); 4 the attorneys' fees and costs, in the amount of $7,123,989.52 shall bear interest at the rate of 3.50% per annum from 8/21/01 until paid; the Order on attorneys' fees and costs (#401) is certified as a final order under FRCP 54(b); the jury verdict in the amount of $350,001.00 on Count 10 of the defendants' counterclaim shall bear interest at the rate of 3.50% per annum from 5/30/01 until paid; 6 the Order on the defendants' request for injunction is not certified as a final order under FRCP 54(b) because there remain to be resolved further issues respecting the scope of the injunction to be issued (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (and faxed as per Order) [EOD Date: 8/21/01] (rpiz)
August 21, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 408 ORDER (STIPULATION REGARDING APPLICABLE INTEREST RATE): The interest rate of 3.50% shall apply to the award of $7,123,989.52 in attorneys' fees, such interest to commence on 8/21/01, the date of entry of final judgment thereon; and the interest rate of 3.50% shall apply to the award of $350,001 in punitive and nominal damages, such interest to commence on 5/30/01 (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 8/21/01] (rpiz)
August 21, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 407 ORDER the evidentiary hearing respecting the scope of the injunction granted 8/9/01, which had been scheduled for 9/4/01, is rescheduled for 9/24/01 at 9:30 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 8/20/01 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/21/01] (cgar) Modified on 08/21/2001
August 17, 2001 Filing 406 NOTICE of Docketing from USCA Federal Circuit (cgar)
August 17, 2001 Filing 405 TRANSCRIPT of conference call for date of 8/15/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
August 17, 2001 USCA FEDERAL CIRCUIT Case Number Re: [401-1] order, [398-1] order USCA NUMBER: 01-1583 (cgar)
August 17, 2001 Motion hearing re: [337-1] motion by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products set at 9:00 10/11/01 (snea)
August 16, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 404 ORDER (1) by 8/20/01, the parties shall submit an agreed discovery schedule re: witnesses who will testify at evidentiary hearing (2) the evidentiary hearing is set for 9/4/01 at 9:30 a.m., and (3) oral argument on the request for an injunction shall be heard on 10/11/01 at 9:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/16/01] (cgar)
August 16, 2001 Filing 403 Permanent Injunction Bond $ 1,000,000.00 filed by Infineon, Approved as to form and substance by U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne entered 8/20/01 and filed 8/21/01 (cgar) Modified on 08/21/2001
August 13, 2001 Copy of Notice of Appeal, Judgment and docket sheet to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals: [402-1] appeal by Rambus, Inc. (lsal)
August 10, 2001 Filing 402 NOTICE OF APPEAL OF [401-1] order, [398-1] order by Rambus, Inc. FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 59930. TPO package mailed. (cgar)
August 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 401 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [341-1] motion by Infineon et al.,for certain Attorney Fees and Expenses, such that Rambus is ORDERED to pay $7,123,989.52 in attorney's fees and expenses incurred by Infineon in the defense of the patent infringement suit and in the prosecution of its actual fraud counterclaim, the award shall bear interest at the appropriate rate, within ten days the parties shall agree on the appropriate rate and so advise the Court or file briefs on the subject ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/9/01] (scoo)
August 9, 2001 Filing 400 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (scoo)
August 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 399 (RESCINDED PER ORDER ENTERED 11/26/01)MEMORANDUM OPINION, Infineon's motion for an injunction against the action in Germany is Denied, but the motion for an injunction of lesser scope is granted (Proposed Order of Permanent Injunction attached) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (scoo) Modified on 11/27/2001
August 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 398 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [335-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Judgment as a Matter of Law such that: the jury verdict on Count 10, actual fraud, Question 1(b) of the Special Verdict Form finding Rambus liable for actual fraud respecting its conduct in relation to JEDEC's DDR SDRAM standard is set aside, the jury verdict on Count 11 (constructive fraud) is set aside, all other asserted grounds for judgment as a matter of law are DENIED, and granting in part, denying in part [333-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for New Trial such that: if the partial grant of judgment as a matter of law on Count 10 is adjudged to be in error, the motion is GRANTED for a new trial on actual fraud alleged to be commetted by Rambus in connection with JEDEC's DDR SDRAM standards-setting efforts, and the motion is DENIED as to all other grounds asserted ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/9/01] (scoo)
August 9, 2001 Filing 397 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (scoo)
August 2, 2001 Filing 396 Reply (Statement of Position) by Rambus, Inc. to [395-1] by Infineon et al. (cgar)
August 1, 2001 Filing 395 Response by Infineon et al to [394-1] order response (Statement of Position) by Rambus, Inc. (cgar) Modified on 08/02/2001
July 31, 2001 Filing 394 RESPONSE (Statement of Position) by Rambus, Inc. to [393-1] 7/30/01 Order (cgar)
July 30, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 393 ORDER that the Order Entered 7/30/01 is VACATED, and substituted with the following: It is ORDERED that by 5:00 p.m. 7/31/01, the pltf shall file a Statement of Position, not to exceed five pages, addressing only whether a new trial limited to the issue of damages is required if the jury's verdict that the pltf committed fraud (actual or constructive) "in Rambus" conduct related to the JEDEC DDR SDRAM is set aside (see Verdict Form, Question 1 (b) and Question 5 (b), by 5:00 p.m., August 1, 2001, the defts shall file a response not to exceed five pages, and by 5:00 p.m. August 2, 2001 the pltf shall file its reply not to exceed 3 pages ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 7/30/01] (scoo)
July 30, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 392 ORDER that by 5:00 p.m. July 31, 2001 the pltf shall file a Statement of Position, not to exceed five pages, addressing only whether a new trial limited to the issue of damages is required if the jury's verdict that the pltf committed fraud (actual or constructive) "in Rambus", conduct related to the JEDEC DDR SDRAM is set aside (see Verdict Form, Question 1 (b) and Question 5 (b), by 5:00 p.m. August 2, the defts shall file a response, not to exceed five pages and by 5:00 p.m. 8/2/01 the pltf shall file its reply, not to exceed 3 pages ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 7/30/01] (scoo)
July 26, 2001 Filing 391 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 7/16/01 before The Hon. Robert E. Payne (placed in brown expanable) (scoo)
July 24, 2001 Filing 390 Response by Infineon to [388-1] objection by Rambus, Inc. (thom)
July 24, 2001 Filing 389 OBJECTION by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Holding to Rambus' (Proposed) Orders Granting Infineon's Request for an Injunction (thom)
July 24, 2001 Revised (Proposed) Permanent Injunction by Infineon (SDRAM) rec'd only and placed on left side of file. (thom)
July 24, 2001 Revised (Proposed) Permanent Injunction by Infinenon [SDRAM & DDR SDRAM] rec'd only and placed on left side of file. (thom)
July 20, 2001 Filing 388 OBJECTION by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to Infineon's (Proposed) Order Granting InFineon's Request for Permanent Injunction (scoo)
July 20, 2001 Recd Rambus's Proposed Order granting Infineon's request for an injunction (SDRAM) (placed on left side of case file) (scoo)
July 20, 2001 Recd Rambus's Proposed Order granting Infineon's Request for an injunction (SDRAM & DDR SDRAM) (placed on left side of case file) (scoo)
July 19, 2001 Filing 387 Complete set of excerpts from deposition transcripts shown at trial(videotape) filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (Attachments 1-11 placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
July 18, 2001 Filing 386 Deposition Testimony Admited as Trial Evidence filed by defendant Infineon et al (Exhibits 1-8 in brown expandable) (cgar)
July 18, 2001 Filing 385 Excerpts from the deposition transcripts of Gordon Kelley and Ken McGhee (presented to the jury by videotape testimony) filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
July 18, 2001 USCA FEDERAL CIRCUIT LETTER re: notice of docketing (cgar)
July 16, 2001 Filing 384 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Arguments had on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Arguments had on Defendant's Motion for an Anti-Suit Injunction. Arguments had on Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees. Motions not ruled on at this time. Opinions to enter later. (snea) Modified on 07/17/2001
July 13, 2001 Filing 383 Reply (Statement) by Infineon et al on [377-1] the Issue of Identifying Specific Rambus patent Applications related to JEDEC's Standarization (cgar)
July 13, 2001 Filing 382 Reply by Infineon et al., to [378-1] Brief in Response to Infineon's Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Rambus' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (cgar)
July 13, 2001 Filing 381 Reply (Supplemental) by Infineon et al to [337-1] motion by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (cgar)
July 12, 2001 Filing 380 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [376-1] Infineon's Statement regarding Patent Claims and Accused Products at Issue in the German Litigation between Rambus and Infineon (cgar)
July 11, 2001 Filing 379 RESPONSE (Supplemental) by Rambus, Inc. to [337-1] motion by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (Exhibit (Declaration of Neil A. Steinberg FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
July 11, 2001 Filing 378 Response (Brief) by Rambus, Inc. to [371-1] motion response by Infineon et al, Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Ramubs' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (cgar) Modified on 07/12/2001
July 11, 2001 Filing 377 Response by Rambus, Inc. to [370-1] Infineon's Statement Identifying Specific Rambus Patent Applications that related to JEDED'S SDRAM and SDRAM Standarization work (Exhibit in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 07/13/2001
July 11, 2001 Filing 376 Statement regarding Patent Claims and Accused Products at issue in the German Ligitation between Rambus and Infineon filed by defendant Infineon et al [373-1] order (Exhibits in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 07/12/2001
July 10, 2001 Filing 375 TRANSCRIPT of telephone conference before the Honorable Robert E. Payne on July 3, 2001 at 11:15 a.m. (khan)
July 10, 2001 Filing 374 TRANSCRIPT of telephone conference before the Honorable Robert E. Payne on July 3, 2001 at 3:35 p.m. (khan) Modified on 07/11/2001
July 10, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 373 ORDER by 7/11/01 at 5:00 pm, the Defendants shall file a statement (see Order for further details); Rambus shall file its Response by 5:00 pm on 7/12/01 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 7/10/01] (cgar)
July 6, 2001 Filing 372 SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY by Infineon et al. to response to [337-1] motion by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (Exhibits in brown expandable) (cgar)
July 6, 2001 Filing 371 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon et al., to [335-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Judgment as a Matter of Law (cgar)
July 6, 2001 Filing 370 Infineon's Statement Identifying specific pending Rambus Patent Applications that related to JEDEC'S SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Standardization work by defendant Infineon et al., [369-1] order (Exhibits A-I in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 07/06/2001
July 3, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 369 ORDER that Infineon shall file, according to the briefing schedule established in the 6/28/01 Order, a statement identifying the proof at trial linking specific pending Rambus patent applications which are contended by Infineon to be related to specific proposed SDRAM JEDEC standards, thereby addressing specifically the argument made by Rambus at the top of page 12 of Pltf Rambus Inc.'s Mem. Sup. of its Renewed Motion for Judgmt. as a Matter of Law...It is further ordered that Infineon shall file,...a statement identifying the proof at trial linking specific pending Rambus patent applications which are contended by Infineon to be related to specific proposed DDR SDRAM JEDEC standards, thereby addressing specifically the argument made by Rambus at the top of page 12 of pltf's Mem. in Sup. in its Renewed Motion for Judgmt. as a Matter of Law...Rambus shall respond to the statement hereinabove required. It is furthered ordered that in their filings, the parties shall identify all evidence of record that defines when the first showing of a JEDEC standard occurs under JEDEC's rules and procedures in effect all relevant times and shall identify all evidence of record reflecting when the first showing occurred of the JEDEC DDR SDRAM standard (see order for further details) (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne at 6:40 p.m.) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile on 6/3/01 by KH [EOD Date: 7/5/01] (cgar)
July 3, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 367 ORDER granting [360-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Declaration in Opposition to Infineon's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Certain Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall file under seal the Declaration of Neil Steinberg received on 6/22/01 as of the date of this Order. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 7/2/01 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/3/01] (cgar) Modified on 07/03/2001
July 2, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 368 Declaration of Neil Steinberg in further support of Opposition to Infineon's Motion for Certain Attorneys' fees and Expenses by Rambus, Inc. (Filed per Order signed by Judge Payne 7/2/01) (cgar) Modified on 09/26/2002
June 29, 2001 Filing 366 TRANSCRIPT of Telephone Conference Before The Honorable Robert E. Payne for the date of June 28, 2001 (khan)
June 28, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 365 ORDER that Infineon shall file supplemental brief in support of its Motion for Injunctive Relief by 9:00 am on 7/6/01; Rambus shall file a response brief by 12:00 noon on 7/11/01; Infineon shall file a reply brief by 9:00 am on 7/13/01; and the hearing for all post-trial motions shall be rescheduled from 7/6/01 at 9:00 am to 7/16/01 at 10:00 am; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 6/28/01] (thom)
June 27, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 364 ORDER granting [363-1] notice by Hynix Withdrawing [344-1] motion by Hynix to Intervene and to Modify 3/29/01 and 04/20/01 Orders (moot because the motion has been denied) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 6/27/01] (scoo)
June 26, 2001 Filing 363 NOTICE by Hynix Withdrawing [344-1] motion by Hynix to Intervene and to Modify 3/29/01 and 04/20/01 Orders (scoo)
June 22, 2001 Filing 362 Corrected NOTICE OF APPEAL OF [332-1] order by Rambus, Inc. . (scoo)
June 22, 2001 Filing 361 Brief by Rambus, Inc. in support of [360-1] motion for Leave to File Declaration in Opposition to Infineon's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Certain Attorneys' Fees and Expenses (cgar) Modified on 09/26/2002
June 22, 2001 Filing 360 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Declaration in Opposition to Infineon's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Certain Attorneys' Fees and Expenses (Placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 02/18/2004
June 21, 2001 Filing 359 NOTICE OF APPEAL OF [332-1] order by Rambus, Inc. FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 59232. TPO package given. (cgar)
June 19, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 358 ORDER granting [339-1] motion by Infineon et al,to Dismiss without Prejudice Count 12 (Monopolization) of its Counterclaim and Count 12 of the Counterclaim will be dismissed without prejudice. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 6/19/01] (cgar) Modified on 06/19/2001
June 19, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 357 ORDER, EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OF BRIEF IN RESPONSE, the time in which Rambus may file a brief in response to the Motion (of Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. to Intervene and to Modify 3/29/01 and 4/20/01 Orders) is extended to and including 6/28/01. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 6/18/01) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 6/19/01] (cgar)
June 14, 2001 Filing 356 REPLY by Infineon, et al. to response to [341-1] motion by Infineon et al. for certain Attorney Fees and Expenses (PLACED IN BROWN EXPANDABLE) Exhibits in black binder - (cgar) Modified on 09/26/2002
June 14, 2001 Filing 355 REPLY by Infineon et al. to response to [337-1] motion by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (cgar)
June 14, 2001 Filing 354 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [335-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Exhibits in separate brown envelope - EXHIBITS ONLY FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
June 14, 2001 Filing 353 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [333-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for New Trial (cgar)
June 13, 2001 Filing 352 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to response to [339-1] motion by Infineon et al,to Dismiss without Prejudice Count 12 (Monopolization) of its Counterclaim (scoo)
June 12, 2001 Filing 351 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
June 7, 2001 Filing 350 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [341-1] motion by Infineon et al.,for certain Attorney Fees and Expenses (w/Exhibits) (Placed in brown expandable) (thom) Modified on 09/26/2002
June 7, 2001 Filing 349 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [339-1] motion by Infineon et al,to Dismiss without Prejudice Count 12 (Monopolization) its Counterclaim (w/Appendix of Exhibits UNDER SEAL) (thom)
June 7, 2001 Filing 348 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [337-1] motion by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (w/Appendix UNDER SEAL) (thom)
June 7, 2001 Filing 347 RESPONSE (Opposition) by Infineon, Infineon, and Infineon Holding to [335-1] renewed motion by Rambus, Inc. for Judgment as a Matter of Law (exhibits placed in brown expandable folder) (rpiz)
June 7, 2001 Filing 346 RESPONSE (Opposition) by Infineon, Infineon, and Infineon Holding to [333-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for a New Trial (exhibits placed in brown expandable folder) (rpiz) Modified on 06/07/2001
June 4, 2001 Filing 345 MEMORANDUM by Hynix in support of [344-1] motion to Intervene and to Modify 3/29/01 and 04/20/01 Orders (cgar)
June 4, 2001 Filing 344 MOTION by Hynix to Intervene and to Modify 3/29/01 and 04/20/01 Orders (cgar)
June 1, 2001 Filing 343 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Hon. Robert E. Payne for date of 05/21/01 (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 342 MEMORANDUM by Infineon et al., in support of [341-1] motion for certain Attorney Fees and Expenses, Exhibits in black binder (Placed in brown expandable) (FILED UNDER SEAL- Declaration of Clifford E. Wilkins and all exhibits thereto)(cgar) Modified on 09/26/2002
May 31, 2001 Filing 341 MOTION by Infineon et al.,for certain Attorney Fees and Expenses (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 340 MEMORANDUM by Infineon et al,. in support of [339-1] motion to Dismiss without Prejudice Count 12 (Monopolization) of its Counterclaim (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 339 MOTION by Infineon et al,to Dismiss without Prejudice Count 12 (Monopolization) of its Counterclaim (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 338 MEMORANDUM by Infineon et al., in support of [337-1] motion for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (Exhibits in black binder) (cgar) Modified on 05/31/2001
May 31, 2001 Filing 337 MOTION by Infineon et al. for Injunctive Relief Barring Rambus from Pursuing further Patent Infringment Litigation against Infineon's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM Products (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 336 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [335-1] renewed motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 335 RENEWED MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Exhibits received 6/15/01 in brown expandable folder) (cgar) Modified on 06/15/2001
May 31, 2001 Filing 334 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [333-1] motion for New Trial (cgar)
May 31, 2001 Filing 333 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for New Trial (Exhibits received 6/15/01- placed in brown expandable folder) (cgar) Modified on 06/15/2001
May 30, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 332 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE, ORDERED that the defts' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law made pursuant to FRCP 50 (a) at the end of pltf's case in chief is GRANTED in favor of the defts on Count One of the First Amended Complaint, the Motion for Judgment as Matter of Law is GRANTED on Count Four of the First Amended Complaint, Defts' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law was GRANTED on Counts Two and Three of the First Amended Complaint, Judgment is entered in favor of the defts and against the pltf on Counts One, Two, Three and Four of the First Amended Complaint and that the pltf shall take nothing of the defts on account of the First Amended Complaint, it is further Ordered that pltf's oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is GRANTED as to the defts' Counterclaim Count 8 and Count 9, GRANTED as to the defts' Counterclaim Count 13, DENIED as to the defts' Counterclaim Count 14, and judgment is entered in favor of the pltf and against the defts on Count 8 and Count 9 of the Counterclaim and the defts shall take nothing of the pltf on account of Count 8 or Count 9 of the Counterclaim, by virture of the jury's verdict (pleading No. 319), judgment is entered in favor of the defts and against the pltf on Count 10 of the defts' Counterclaim (actual faud) in the sum on ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) nominal damages on Count 10, the award of punitive damages in favor of the defts and against the pltf in the amount of THREE MILLION AND FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,500,000.00) is reduced to the amount allowed by statue, and judgment is AWARDED on the jury's verdict on Count 10 in favor of the defts and against the pltf in the amount of THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($350,000.00) punitive damages, judgment is entered in favor of the defts against the pltf on Count 10 in the total amount of THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND AND ONE DOLLARS ($350,001.00) together with interest at the judgment rate until paid, by virtue of the jury's verdict judgment is entered in favor of the defts and against the pltf on Count 11 of the defts' Counterclaim (actual fraud) in the sum of ONE DOLLAR nominal damages on Count 11, and by virtue of the jury's verdict judgment is entered in favor of the pltf and against the defts on Count 14 of the Counterclaim and it is Ordered that defts shall take nothing of the pltf on account of Count 14 of the Counterclaim, by agreement of the parties it is Further ORDERED that execution on the monetary awards is hereby STAYED until (1) fourteen (14) days after entry of a decision on post-trial motions respecting awards of monetary damages, nominal and punitive , and attorneys fees or (2) further order of the Court, the defts' claim for attorneys fees on Count 10 and Count 11 of the counterclaim, the mode of dismissal for Count 12 (monopolization) of the Counterclaim the defts' claim for equitable releif on Count 10 and Count 11 of the Counterclaim as well as the pltf's various forthcoming motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law, it is Ordered that this JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE is not a judgment carrying the certification defined by the first sentence of FRCP 54(b) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and faxed [EOD Date: 5/31/01] (scoo)
May 30, 2001 Filing 330 TRANSCRIPT of jury trial for date of 5/7/01 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (Volume XII) (rpiz)
May 29, 2001 Filing 331 Discovery Designation filed by Rambus, Inc. (Deposition Designations) (rpiz)
May 29, 2001 Filing 329 MEMORANDUM OPINION, because Rambus has failed to demostrate that Infineon's products meet the definitions of "read request" and 'bus", judgment as a matter of law was granted and judgment WILL BE ENTERED in Infineon's favor on Count One as to claims 1 and 2 of the `263 patent and Count Four as to claim 18 of the `918 patent ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (scoo) Modified on 05/29/2001
May 24, 2001 Filing 328 TRANSCRIPT for date of 05/08/01 Volume XIII before Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
May 23, 2001 Filing 327 NOTICE of Micron Technology by Micron Technology Withdrawing [275-1] support memorandum [274-1] motion by Micron Technology to Intervene [274-2] motion by Micron Technology to modify 03/29/01 and 04/20/01 Orders (cgar)
May 22, 2001 Filing 326 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 5/9/01 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne, Volume XIV (khan)
May 22, 2001 Filing 325 TRANSCRIPT for dates of May 3, 2001, before the Honorable Robert E. Payne, Volume X (khan) Modified on 05/23/2001
May 22, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 324 ORDER denying [265-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to exclude Infineon's Litigation costs as an element of its Antitrust and Rico Injury, Infineon having withdrawn its Motion to Introduce the Testimony of Charles Donohoe, that motion is being DENIED as moot [263-1] ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies yes [EOD Date: 5/22/01] (cgar)
May 22, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 323 ORDER all post-trial motions and supporting briefs shall be filed by 12:00 noon on 5/31/01; response briefs shall be filed by 12:00 noon on 6/7/01; and reply briefs shall be filed by 12:00 noon on 6/14/01. It is further ORDERED that oral argument on all motions shall be held on 7/6/01 at 9:30 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 5/22/01] (cgar)
May 18, 2001 Filing 322 TRANSCRIPT (Volume VIII) for date of 05/01/01 (cgar)
May 18, 2001 Filing 321 TRANSCRIPT (Volume XI) for date of 05/04/01 (cgar)
May 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 320 ORDER that the U.S.Marshal shall furnish lunch for the jurors in this cause and submit the bill to the Clerk for payment. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: [EOD Date: 5/9/01] (snea)
May 9, 2001 Filing 319 JURY VERDICT for Infineon, Infineon Against Rambus , Please See Verdict Form in case file for specific answers to questions. Clerk directed not to enter Judgment on the Verdict until further Order of the Court. (snea)
May 9, 2001 Filing 318 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 13. Payne,J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Jurors appeared; all present. Jury retired at 9:10 a.m. to begin deliberations. Questions received from the jury and answered in writing by the Court. Court Ordered lunch furnished for the jurors. Jurors returned Verdict at 2:00 p.m.finding on Count 10 in favor of Infineon against Rambus and awarding nominal damanges in the sum of $1.00 and awarding Punitive Damages in the sum of $3,500,000.00 (See Verdict form in case file for specific findings to questions answered. ) Jury discharged. Court will allow counsel time to file post trial briefs. Clerk directed not to enter judgment on the jury verdict pending further Order of the Court. (snea) Modified on 05/09/2001
May 9, 2001 Filing 317 Stipulations filed by Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Regarding Exhibits Submitted to the Jury filed in Open Court (snea)
May 9, 2001 Filing 316 Stipulations of trial witnesses' ownership interest in Rambus, Inc. and Infineon Technologies (scoo)
May 9, 2001 Filing 315 Proposed Jury instructions by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (scoo)
May 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 314 Stipulation regarding Rambus'Patent License Agreements ORDER ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne entered 5/9/01 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/9/01] (scoo)
May 9, 2001 Filing 313 TRANSCRIPT for dates of May 2, 2001 Volume IX before Hon. Robert E. Payne (scoo)
May 9, 2001 Filing 312 TRANSCRIPT for dates of April 30,2001 Volume VII Part 1 and Part 2 before Hon. Robert E. Payne (scoo)
May 9, 2001 Filing 311 TRANSCRIPT for dates of April 27, 2001 Volume VI before Hon. Robert E. Payne (scoo)
May 9, 2001 Filing 310 TRANSCRIPT for dates of April 26, 2001 Volume V before Hon. Robert E. Payne (scoo)
May 8, 2001 Filing 309 Minute entry: JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 13. Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Parties with counsel. Court reviewed Proposed Jury Instructions with counsel. Jury appeared; all present. Closing Arguments had by Defendants'. Plaintiff's Motion for A Mistrial heard; Motion denied. Lunch recess had. Closing arguments had by Plaintiff. Jury charged by the Court. Jury sent home at 5:40 p.m. to return tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. Court adjourned at 5:45 p.m. (snea) Modified on 05/09/2001
May 8, 2001 Filing 308 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. as a matter of law on Infineon's Counterclaims and Equitable Estoppel Defense (cgar) Modified on 05/08/2001
May 7, 2001 Filing 307 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 12. Payne, J., Diane Daffron. Chandler & Halasz. Parties by counsel. counsel. Jurors appeared; all present. Plaintiff adduced rebuttal evidence; rested. Evidence concluded. Jurors sent home at 5:30 p.m. Plaintiff's Motion For Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Statute of Limitations and on the Rico Claims heard; arguments had. Motion denied. Court adjourned at 6:45 p.m. (snea) Modified on 05/09/2001
May 7, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 306 ORDER (Stipulation) regarding testimony of Maria Sobrino if called as a witness ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies hand delivered by chambers [EOD Date: 5/7/01] (clerk)
May 7, 2001 Filing 305 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of its motions for judgment as a matter of law (scoo)
May 7, 2001 Filing 304 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to Rambus' motion for judgment as a matter of law (scoo)
May 7, 2001 Filing 303 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon for Reconsideration of [294-1] order ruling granting judgment as a matter of law on Infieon's attempted monopolization claim (scoo)
May 4, 2001 Filing 302 Minute entry: Payne, J., Tracy Stroh, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Jury appeared; all present. Defendants continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Claims 18 of the 918 patent and Claims 1 and 2 of the 263 patent heard; arguments had. Motion granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment As a Matter of Law on Defendants Breach of Contract Counts 8 and 8 heard; arguments had. Motion granted. Court brought the jurors back in from the lunch recess and discharged them to return Monday, May 7 at 10:00 a.m. for further trial proceedings. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Testimony of Dr. Carlson heard; arguments had. Motion denied. Plaintiff's Motion For Judgment on the RICO Count heard; arguments had. Motion denied. Arguments had on whether attorney fees can be awarded on the RICO Count heard. Plaintiff's Objection to Attorneys Fees is Overruled. Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Attorney Fees as a Litigation Cost is Denied. Court adjourned at 7:30 p.m. (snea) Modified on 05/07/2001
May 4, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 301 STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding Rambus patents, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that Infineon's declaratory counterclaims of noninfringement, invalidity and unenforceability with respect to the '263 (except claims 1-2), '804, '214 and '918 (except claim 18) patents are dismissed without prejudice as moot ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/4/01] (cgar)
May 4, 2001 Filing 299 REPLY by Infineon et al to response to [292-1] motion by Infineon et al for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Rambus' Claim of Infringement (cgar)
May 3, 2001 Filing 300 Minute entry: JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 10. Parties with counsel. Jury appeared; all present. Defendants continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Defendants' continued to adduce evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:15 p.m. to return tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. for further trial proceedings. Court adjourned at 5:30 p.m. (snea)
May 3, 2001 Filing 298 TRANSCRIPT ( Volume I) for date of 04/20/01 (cgar)
May 3, 2001 Filing 297 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [292-1] motion by Infineon et al for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Rambus' Claim of Infringement (cgar)
May 2, 2001 Filing 296 Minute entry: Payne, J., Tracy Stroh, Chandler & Halasz. Jurors appeared; all present. Defendants continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Defendants continued to adduce evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:30 p.m. to return tomorrow for furher trial proceedings. Court adjourned at 5:40 p.m. (snea)
May 2, 2001 Filing 295 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [265-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to exclude Infineon's Litigation costs as an element of its Antitrust and Rico Injury (rpiz)
May 2, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 294 ORDER that the Defendants' oral motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is GRANTED as to claims 3, 4, 5, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 32, 33 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 and claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 19, 20, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 33 and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918. Excepted from this provision at this time are claims 1 and 2 of the '263 patent and claim 18 of the '918 patent. The Defendant's oral motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is GRANTED as to willful infringement of the patents in suit and that claim is dismised. The parties shall submit briefs on Infineon's oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to claims 1 and 2 of the '263 patent and claim 18 of the '918 patent; Infineon shall submit its brief by 9:00 a.m. on 5/2/01 and Rambus shall file its response by 9:00 a.m. on 5/3/01. Rambus having agreed that the M.O. entered on 3/15/01 forecloses its claims of infringement under U.S. Patent No. 5,954,804 and that the provisions of paragraph (3) of the Order entered 4/27/01 forecloses the infringement claim under U.S. Patent No. 6,032,214, it is ORDERED that judgment as a matter of law is hereby entered in favor of the defendants on the infringement claims respecting those patents (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: no, given by hand [EOD Date: 5/2/01] (rpiz)
May 2, 2001 Filing 293 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, and Infineon Holding in support of [292-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, and Infineon for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Rambus' Claim of Infringement (rpiz)
May 2, 2001 Filing 292 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, and Infineon for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Rambus' Claim of Infringement (rpiz)
May 1, 2001 Filing 291 Minute entry: JURY TRIAL PROCEEDIDNGS. Day 8. Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Parties with counsel. Jury appeared; all present. Defendants continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Defendants continued to adduce evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:25 p.m. to return tommorrow at 10:00 a.m. for further trial proceedings. Court adjourned at 5:30 p.m. (snea)
May 1, 2001 Filing 290 TRANSCRIPT (in chambers) for date of 04/23/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 289 TRANSCRIPT (in chambers) for date of 04/23/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 288 TRANSCRIPT (Volume II) for date of 04/23/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 287 TRANSCRIPT (Volume IV) for date of 04/25/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 286 TRANSCRIPT (conference in chambers) for date of 04/24/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 285 TRANSCRIPT (conference in chambers) for date of 04/24/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 284 TRANSCRIPT (conference in chambers) for date of 04/10/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 283 TRANSCRIPT (conference in chambers) for date of 04/10/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 282 TRANSCRIPT (Trial proceedings Volume III) for date of 04/24/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
May 1, 2001 Filing 281 TRANSCRIPT (Final Pretrial Conference) for date of 04/10/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
April 30, 2001 Filing 280 Minute entry: JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 7. Parties with counsel. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence; rested. Lunch recess had. Defendant adduced evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:40 p.m. to return tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. Defendants' Rule 50 Motion for Judgment As A Matter of Law heard; arguments had. The Court will allow the parties to file additional briefing on this motion. Counsel for the defendants to file their brief Wednesday Morning. Counsel for the plaintiff to file their brief on Thursday Morning. Court adjourned at 6: (snea) Modified on 05/01/2001
April 30, 2001 Filing 279 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [263-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to introduce the testimony of Charles Donohoe (FILED UNDER SEAL) (clerk)
April 30, 2001 Filing 278 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [265-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to exclude Infineon's Litigation costs as an element of its Antitrust and Rico Injury (khan)
April 30, 2001 Filing 277 Case in Chief Deposition Designations filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (clerk)
April 27, 2001 Filing 276 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 6 Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties with counsel. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:40 p.m. to return Monday at 9:30 a.m. for further trial proceedings. Court adjourned at 5:55 p.m. (snea)
April 27, 2001 Filing 275 MEMORANDUM by Micron Technology in support of [274-1] motion to Intervene (Proposed Order placed on left) (cgar) Modified on 04/27/2001
April 27, 2001 Filing 274 MOTION by Micron Technology to Intervene , and by Micron Technology to modify 03/29/01 and 04/20/01 Orders (cgar)
April 27, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 273 ORDER granting in part, denying in part [236-1] motion by Infineon to exclude Dr. Huber's 03/13/01 second supplemental expert report (see Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (hand delivered) [EOD Date: 4/27/01] (cgar)
April 27, 2001 Filing 272 Brief by Infineon et al regarding Rambus' DTX 111A Admission (cgar)
April 26, 2001 Filing 271 TRANSCRIPT for date of 04/19/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 26, 2001 Filing 270 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 5. Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Parties with counsel. Jury appeared; all present. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Jurors sent home at 5:15 p.m. to return tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. for further trial proceedings. Court adjourned at 5:25 p.m. (snea)
April 26, 2001 Filing 269 TRANSCRIPT for hearing date of 4/19/01 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (khan)
April 26, 2001 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [268-1] motion by Infineon et al Peter John Armenio for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 58431 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar) Modified on 04/26/2001
April 25, 2001 Filing 268 MOTION by Infineon et al Peter John Armenio for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 58431 (cgar) Modified on 04/26/2001
April 25, 2001 Filing 267 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 4 Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Parties with counsel. Jury appeared; all present. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence. Lunch recess had. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:25 p.m. return tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. for further trial proceedings. Court ruled on objections to proposed deposition testimony. Court adjourned at 6:00 p.m. (snea) Modified on 04/27/2001
April 25, 2001 Filing 266 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [265-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to exclude Infineon's Litigation costs as an element of its Antitrust and Rico Injury (scoo)
April 25, 2001 Filing 265 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to exclude Infineon's Litigation costs as an element of its Antitrust and Rico Injury (scoo)
April 25, 2001 Filing 264 MEMORANDUM in support of [263-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to introduce the testimony of Charles Donohoe (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo) Modified on 04/25/2001
April 25, 2001 Filing 263 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to introduce the testimony of Charles Donohoe (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
April 25, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 262 ORDER granting [234-1] motion by Infineon to preclude Rambus from using at trial post-lawsuit certificates of correction ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/25/01] (scoo)
April 24, 2001 Filing 261 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 3 Payne, J., Tracy Stroh, Chandler and Halasz, Court Reporter. Parties with counsel. Jury appeared, all present. Plaintiff began to adduce evidence. Witnesses excluded on Motion of the Defendants. Lunch recess had. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence. Jurors sent home at 5:40 p.m. to return tomorrow for further trial proceedings. (snea) Modified on 04/27/2001
April 24, 2001 Filing 260 Amended OBJECTIONS by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to Defendants' Demonstrative Exhibits (thom)
April 23, 2001 Filing 259 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 2. Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties with counsel. Jury appeared; all present. Juror #56 excused from any further jury duty. Opening Statements made. Jury sent home at 4:45 p.m. to return tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. for further tiral proceedings. (snea) Modified on 04/27/2001
April 23, 2001 Filing 258 Limited Instruction Regarding Articles filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (PTX 209, 214, 215, 216, 218, 220, 223, 228, 229, 232, 234, 236, 242, 245, 249) (rpiz)
April 23, 2001 Filing 257 Proposed Limiting Instructions filed by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Holding (thom)
April 23, 2001 Filing 256 OBJECTIONs to Rambus Demonstrative Exhibits by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Holding (thom)
April 23, 2001 Filing 255 Addendum to Exhibit A of the Final Pretrial Order filed by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Holding (thom)
April 23, 2001 Filing 254 Proposed Limiting Instructions filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (w/attached blacklined version, text added by Rambus to defendants' version is underlined, and text deleted by Rambus is bracketed pursuant to cover letter of 4/23/01) (thom)
April 23, 2001 Stipulation of Trial Witnesses' Ownership Interest in Rambus, Inc. and Infineon Technologies AG. et al. rec'd only (thom)
April 20, 2001 Filing 253 Discovery Designation filed by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
April 20, 2001 Filing 252 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Defendants' Objections to Exhibits heard. Arguments had. Objections overruled in part; sustained in part. (snea) Modified on 05/09/2001
April 20, 2001 Filing 251 Deposition Summaries filed by defendant Infineon et al., (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 05/09/2001
April 20, 2001 Filing 250 Minute entry:JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS: Day 1 Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for Jury Trial Proceedings. Jury panel examined on voir dire and empaneled to try case. Jurors serving are Nos. 1,46,20,54,42,47,8,34 and 56. Jurors excused to return Monday, April 23, 2001 for further trial proceedings. Court exhibit No. 1 placed in case file on the left side. (snea)
April 20, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 249 FILED UNDER SEAL ORDER that the United States shall disclose to the Court and to the parties in this civil action information relating to the security of the jury in this civil action, FILED UNDER SEAL ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes, to all parties and to United States [EOD Date: 4/20/01] (scoo) Modified on 04/20/2001
April 20, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 248 ORDER that Infineon's Proposed Voir Dire (#189) and Rambus' Objections to Infineon's Proposed Voir Dire (#239) shall be placed under seal. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/20/01] (cgar)
April 20, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 247 STIPULATED ORDER, see order for details. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/20/01] (cgar)
April 20, 2001 Exhibits received by Rambus, Inc.(42 black binders in two sets (also 2 exhibit index notebooks)) (cgar)
April 20, 2001 Exhibits received by Infineon et al (Volumes 1-12 trial exhibits and 1-4 of schematics in 2 sets FILED UNDER SEAL SCHEMATICS EXHIBITS ONLY) (cgar) Modified on 04/23/2001
April 19, 2001 Filing 246 TRANSCRIPT of telephone conference for dates of 3/12/01 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (rpiz)
April 19, 2001 Filing 245 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on Pretrial Motions. Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Huber. Motion granted in part; denied in part. Rambus' Exhibits tendered for this hearing in placed in red expandable folder. (snea) Modified on 04/19/2001
April 16, 2001 Filing 244 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to response to [236-1] motion by Infineon to exclude Dr. Huber's 03/13/01 second supplemental expert report (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
April 16, 2001 Filing 243 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to response to [234-1] motion by Infineon to preclude Rambus from using at trial post-lawsuit certificates of correction (scoo)
April 16, 2001 Filing 242 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [236-1] motion by Infineon to exclude Dr. Huber's 03/13/01 second supplemental expert report (w/exhibits) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (thom)
April 16, 2001 Filing 241 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [234-1] motion by Infineon to preclude Rambus from using at trial post-lawsuit certificates of correction (FILED UNDER SEAL) (thom)
April 13, 2001 Filing 240 OBJECTION by defendant Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [188-1] proposed voir dire by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
April 13, 2001 Filing 239 OBJECTION by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to [189-1] proposed voir dire by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL PER ORDER ENTERED 04/20/01) (cgar) Modified on 04/20/2001
April 13, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 238 STIPULATION AND ORDER on various scheduling issues (see Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/13/01] (cgar)
April 12, 2001 Filing 237 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [236-1] motion to exclude Dr. Huber's 03/13/01 second supplemental expert report (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 12, 2001 Filing 236 MOTION by Infineon to exclude Dr. Huber's 03/13/01 second supplemental expert report (cgar)
April 12, 2001 Filing 235 MEMORANDUM by Infineon in support of [234-1] motion to preclude Rambus from using at trial post-lawsuit certificates of correction (PROPOSED ORDER PLACED ON LEFT) (cgar) Modified on 04/13/2001
April 12, 2001 Filing 234 MOTION by Infineon to preclude Rambus from using at trial post-lawsuit certificates of correction (cgar)
April 11, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 233 ORDER that Clerk shall unseal the Final Pretrial Order entered 4-11-01 (placed in brown expandable) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 4/11/01](clerk) Modified on 04/12/2001
April 11, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 232 ORDER that (1) the state of mind, knowledge and reliance of Infineon having been placed at issue by Ifineon, the attorney/client privilege hsas been waived as to the document listed as item 73 and 74 on Infineon' Privilege Log.......(see order for further details & deadlines).....a hearing will be held on 4/19/01 at 9:00 a.m. and the jury trial scheduled for 4/17/01 is continued, (a) jury selection shall begin 4/20/01 at 9:30 a.m., (b) opening statements shall be heard on 4/23/01 at 1:30 p.m. and (c) the presentation of evidence shall begin on 4/24/01 at 9:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/11/01] (scoo)
April 11, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 231 ORDER that the Clerk shall make availabe one copy only of the list of jurors to be called in this action only to counsel for the parties and it is further ORDERED that: (1) counsel shall maintain the identity of the jurors in confidence.....(see order for further details), (4) all persons who have access to the list or the idenity of the jurors are to be shown copy of this Order and shall place their signature on a copy thereof, indicating their agreement to abide by its terms and reflecting their understanding that release of the list or identity of any juror shall be regarded as contempt of court punishable by fine and imprisonment ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/11/01] (scoo)
April 11, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDER that (1) any trade secret design schematics used by Infineon durning the trial shall be placed under seal, except for use by the jury, (2) any trial testimony regarding such designs shall be conducted under seal, (3) it shall be the responsibility of counsel to alert the Court in advance of any such testimony ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and faxed [EOD Date: 4/11/01] (scoo)
April 11, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 229 Final Pretrial Order, (exhibits attached) FILED UNDER SEAL ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 4/10/01) Copies mailed: y (scoo)
April 10, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER (1) by 4/10/01, Infineon shall submit to the Court for in camera review all privileged documents which Rambus alleges to be relevant to Infineon's reliance on the disclosure of the'703 patent; and (2) the subpoenas submitted by Infineon to Messrs. Vincent and Diepenbrock are proper and within the scope of the 03/07/01 Order; (3) the parties shall meet and confer about the documents referenced in the conference call of 4/6/01 that are appropriate for Rambus to deliver to Gordon Kelly before his renewed deoposition. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes, by hand to counsel [EOD Date: 4/10/01] (cgar)
April 10, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 227 ORDER paragraph 4 of the Order entered 03/07/01 is vacated and it if further ORDERED that the asserted waiver of the attorney client privilege set forth in Section E of Infineon's Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents (Pleadings #78 and 79)... is DENIED. It is FURTHER ordered that nothing herein shall in any way limit the scope of discovery allowed by paragraphs 3 (a) and 5 of the Order entered on 03/07/01. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes by hand to counsel [EOD Date: 4/10/01] (cgar)
April 6, 2001 Filing 226 USCA Order as to plaintiff Rambus, Inc.'s petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED (FEDERAL CIRCUIT) (cgar)
April 5, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 225 STIPULATION and ORDER on various scheduling issues (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/5/01] (cgar) Modified on 04/06/2001
April 4, 2001 Filing 224 STATUS REPORT by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
April 4, 2001 Filing 223 Minute entry: Payne, J., Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Counsel informed the Court that the issue has been resolved. (snea)
April 2, 2001 Filing 222 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [221-1] motion to Compel Responses concerning Infineon's Original and Supplemental Document Production efforts (FILED UNDER SEAL)(Exhibit H filed in separate brown envelope - FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
April 2, 2001 Filing 221 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Responses concerning Infineon's Original and Supplemental Document Production efforts (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 30, 2001 Filing 220 TRANSCRIPT for date of March 28, 2001 hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (thom)
March 30, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 219 AMENDMENT TO ORDER dated 03/28/01, Rambus shall be permitted to serve a document subpoena on IBM and Gordon Kelley for documents reasonably related to the issues raised by Infineon's late produced documents. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/30/01] (cgar)
March 29, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 218 ORDER granting [212-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Reconsideration of Paragraph 3 (a) and Corresponding Portions of Paragraph 5 of [164-1] order, denying [182-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Immediate stay of Paragraph 3 (a) of the Court's 03/07/01 Order; provided, however, that no documents shall be produced and no depositions shall be taken until 04/05/01 and such depositions shall, to the extent possible, be conducted in a jury room in the Lewis F. Powell courthouse, subject to the supervision of Judge Payne...see Order for additonal details ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/29/01] (cgar)
March 29, 2001 Filing 217 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/23/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Status Conference) (cgar)
March 28, 2001 Filing 216 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration of Order. Arguments had. Motion denied. Exhibits in I Vol. of Defendant received in Open Court (1 Black Binder). Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Crime Fraud Exception heard; arguments had. Motion Denied. Order to enter. (snea) Modified on 03/28/2001
March 28, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER in re: discovery (SEE ORDER FOR TERMS AND DETAILS); counsel for Infineon shall forthwith undertake a concerted effort to determine the identity of all attendees at the presentation made by Mr. Meyer and to Mr. Schumacher in Sept. 1992, and counsel shall file a written report by 4/4/01... Rambus' motion for a stay of paragraph 3(a) of the March 7, 2001 Order shall be heard on 3/28/01 at 2:00 p.m.; the jury trial is continued from 4/10/01 to 4/17/01 at 9:30 a.m.; the concluding session remainder of the pretrial conference shall be held on 4/10/01 at 10:00 a.m. (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (copies mailed only, per law clerk) [EOD Date: 3/28/01] (rpiz)
March 27, 2001 Filing 214 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [212-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Reconsideration of Paragraph 3 (a) and Corresponding Portions of Paragraph 5 of [164-1] order by Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) EXHIBITS IN WHITE ENVELOP FILED UNDER SEAL (scoo)
March 27, 2001 Filing 211 TRANSCRIPT for date of 01/18/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Tutorial Conference) (cgar)
March 26, 2001 Filing 213 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [212-1] motion for Reconsideration of Paragraph 3 (a) and Corresponding Portions of Paragraph 5 of [164-1] order (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 26, 2001 Filing 212 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Reconsideration of Paragraph 3 (a) and Corresponding Portions of Paragraph 5 of [164-1] order (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 23, 2001 Filing 210 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a status conference. Parties advised the Court regarding recent discovery had and new discovery needed prior to trial. Case will not be tried to a jury beginning at 9:30 a.m. on April 17, 2001. Court will hear arguments on Defendant's Motion To Stay Crime Fraud Exception at 2:00 p.m. on March 28, 2001 and a Final Pretrial Conference will be held beginning at 10:00 a.m. on April 10, 2001. Exhibits tendered by the Plaintiff (tabbed and indexed Exhibits 1-13) were placed in a redwell and placed in the cabinet with the case files. (snea) Modified on 03/26/2001
March 23, 2001 Filing 209 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/14/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Conference in Chambers) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 23, 2001 Motion hearing re: [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order set at 2:00 3/28/01 (snea)
March 23, 2001 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc. set 10:00 4/10/01 for Infineon Corp., for Infineon Holding, for Infineon Inc., for Infineon, for Infineon before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 23, 2001 Status Conference set at 2:00 3/23/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 23, 2001 Jury Trial set at 9:30 4/17/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 22, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 208 ORDER granting [205-1] motion to remove and to add counsel of record by Rambus, Inc.; it is ORDERED that Alexander H. Rogers be removed as a counsel of record for Rambus and that John Guaragna be added as one of Rambus' counsel of record (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 3/22/01] (rpiz)
March 22, 2001 Filing 207 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/15/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Final Pre-Trial Conference) (cgar)
March 22, 2001 Filing 206 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/15/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (Conference at request of Rambus respecting electronic news article of 3-15-01 by Mr. Fife) (cgar)
March 22, 2001 Filing 205 MOTION to remove and to add counsel of record by Rambus, Inc. (cgar) Modified on 03/22/2001
March 21, 2001 Filing 204 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/14/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 21, 2001 Filing 203 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/16/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 20, 2001 Status Conference set at 3:00 3/23/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 19, 2001 Letter from U.S. Court of Appeal for the federal circuit, petition for writ of mandamus has been filed. Misc. No. 667 has been assigned. (cgar)
March 16, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 202 ORDER, Defendants shall perform a supplemental document search, shall report in detail to the Court by March 23, 2001 respecting the reason for the late production of the documents in Rambus' Continuance Motion Exhibit 1, whether there are any other discoverable documents that were not produced, and, if so, why the were not...see Order for further details; the trial is continued until 9:30 am April 10, 2001; and the temporary stay as to paragraph 3 (a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 Order is continued generally until further Order to be issued after the report made to the Court in Paragraph (1) and (10); and after counsel have had an opportunity to assess the results and possible consequences of the late produced documents, a status conference shall be held at 3:00 pm, March 23, 2001 so as to assess the status of this action, any need for further proceedings, and other topics necessary to assure that trial can proceed on schedule. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/16/01] (cgar) Modified on 03/16/2001
March 16, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER denying [117-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude certain evidence and the parties are directed to file separately for each witness a statement detailing all current and expectant ownership interest in Rambus, Inc. and the value thereof, to the extent that it is determinable as of Friday, April 6, 2001, granting [156-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Harry F. Manbeck, Jr., denying [158-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Dennis W. Carlton, granting in part, denying in part [160-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of John M. Kinn, granting [105-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to exclude expert testimony of David J. Teece, denying [109-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine to exclude secondary indicia of nonobviousness, granting [113-1] motion by Infineon Infineon, Infineon Rule 702 to exclude the testimony of Steven A. Przybylski), granting [103-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to exclude expert testimony of Economist Richard T. Rapp beyond the scope of his expertise; granting (111-1) Infineon's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding ADT. See Order for further details. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/16/01] (cgar) Modified on 03/16/2001
March 16, 2001 Filing 200 Minute entry: Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Trial and Status Conference. Arguments had on Plaintiff's Motion To Continue Trial. Motion granted. Trial continued to be held at 9:30 a.m. on April 10, 2001. (snea)
March 16, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER, due to a typographical error, the Clerk is directed to substitute the following pages for pages 69 and 70 of the MO of 3/15/01. ( signed by Judge James R. Spencer ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/16/01] (cgar)
March 16, 2001 Jury Trial set at 9:30 4/10/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 15, 2001 Filing 198 MEMORANDUM OPINION, Re: Claim Construction (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: given by hand (rpiz) Modified on 03/16/2001
March 15, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER denying [88-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants RICO claim (Count 14) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/15/01] (cgar)
March 14, 2001 Filing 196 Document (s) filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., CORRECTED Post-Markman Hearing Designation of Deposition Testimony of Dr. P. Michael Farmwald and Mr. Richard Crisp (CORRECTION to docket entry #151) (cgar) Modified on 03/16/2001
March 14, 2001 Filing 195 Minute entry: Payne, J., Tracy Stroh, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporer. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on motions. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Rico Claim heard; arguments had. Motion taken under advisement. Parties' Motions In Limine Heard. Arguments had. Motions withdrawn in part, granted in part and denied in part. Order to enter. (snea)
March 14, 2001 Filing 194 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order FILED UNDER SEAL (clerk)
March 14, 2001 Filing 193 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. Don G. Rushing for Admission pro hoc vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57805 (clerk)
March 14, 2001 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [193-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Don G. Rushing for Admission pro hac vice (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (rpiz)
March 13, 2001 Filing 192 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order by Rambus, Inc. (received 03-14-01 five unpublished cited decisions to be attached) (clerk) Modified on 03/15/2001
March 13, 2001 Filing 191 OBJECTION by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Holding to [155-1] instructions jury by Rambus, Inc. (clerk)
March 13, 2001 Filing 190 Proposed Special VERDICT form filed by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (clerk)
March 13, 2001 Filing 189 PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Holding (FILED UNDER SEAL PER ORDER ENTERED 04/20/01) (clerk) Modified on 04/20/2001
March 13, 2001 Filing 188 PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (clerk)
March 13, 2001 Filing 187 Proposed Special VERDICT form filed by Rambus, Inc. (clerk) Modified on 03/14/2001
March 13, 2001 Filing 186 Cross-Reference of Pltf's and Defts' Proposed Jury Instructions filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (clerk)
March 13, 2001 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [184-1] motion by Infineon et al., for Gregory Steven Arovas to Appear Pro Hac Vice (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (rpiz)
March 12, 2001 Filing 185 List of Know Products Embodying the Patents in suit filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc.(with attached exhibits A-J) (cgar)
March 12, 2001 Filing 183 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [182-1] motion for Immediate stay of Paragraph 3 (a) of the Court's 03/07/01 Order (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 12, 2001 Filing 182 MOTION by Rambus, Inc.for Immediate stay of Paragraph 3 (a) of the Court's 03/07/01 Order (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 12, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER granting [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order (pleading #164) is temporarily STAYED pending full consideration of the request for stay after revised briefing, and the parties shall submit revised briefs according to the following schedule: Rambus shall file its revised brief by 5:00 p.m. on 3/12/01, Infineon shall its revised oppositon brief by 5:00 on 3/13/01, Rambus shall file its reply brief by 12:00 on 3/14/01, after the receip of the revised pleadings the Court shall inform the parties of the earliest possible date to hear the matter....... ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and faxed [EOD Date: 3/12/01] (scoo)
March 12, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER that the portion of subsection (1) of the Court 3/9/01 Order, (pleading #168), relating to the defts' motion in limine to exclude evidence regarding ADT is VACATED and the motion shall be heard on 3/14/01 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/12/01] (scoo)
March 12, 2001 Filing 179 RESPONSE (Opposition) by Infineon, Infineon, and Infineon Holding to [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order (rpiz)
March 12, 2001 Filing 178 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order (scoo)
March 12, 2001 Filing 177 RESPONSE in opposition by Infineon, Infineon to [160-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of John M. Kinn (scoo)
March 12, 2001 Filing 176 RESPONSE in opposition by Infineon, Infineon to [156-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Harry F. Manbeck, Jr. (scoo)
March 12, 2001 Filing 175 RESPONSE in opposition by Infineon, Infineon to [158-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Dennis W. Carlton (scoo)
March 9, 2001 Filing 184 MOTION by Infineon et al., for Gregory Steven Arovas to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57761 (cgar)
March 9, 2001 Filing 174 Amended Exhibit list by Infineon, Infineon (scoo)
March 9, 2001 Filing 173 OBJECTION by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon to [155-1] instructions jury by Rambus, Inc. (scoo)
March 9, 2001 Filing 172 Amended Prior Art Notice pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282 Document(s) filed by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (scoo)
March 9, 2001 Filing 171 OBJECTION by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to [154-1] instructions jury by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon (scoo)
March 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER that by 5:00 p.m. on 3/12/01, Rambus shall provide to the defts a list of all products known to Rambus that embody the patents in suit and that are alledged to support the commercial success of the patented inventions, and failure to provide such list will result in the granting of the defts' motion and the exclusion of all evidence of commercial success as a secondary indicia of nonobviousness (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and faxed 3:37 p.m. [EOD Date: 3/9/01] (scoo)
March 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER, that Infineon's Counterclaim for monopolization of the DRAM market under 15 U.S.C. section 2 as defined in Counterclaim paragraph 87 and incorporated into Count 12, and Infineon's Counterclaim for attempted monopolization of the DRAM market under 15 U.S.C. section 2, as defined in Counterclaim paragraph 87 and incorporated into Count 13, are DISMISSED. Infineon's counterclaims with respect to the DRAM technology market continue and are unaffected by this order. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/9/01] (cgar)
March 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER granting [115-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude certain evidence (A),(VACATED this portion of the order only, relating to the Deft's motion in limine to exclude evidence regarding ADT) granting [111-1] motion by Infineon et al. in Limine to exclude evidence regarding ADT, granting [107-1] motion by Infineon et al. in Limine under Rule 408; the hearings for the Motions in Limine and the Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants' RICO claim filed by Rambus shall be set for 03/14/01 at 9:00 a.m.; the Final Pretrial Conference shall be held on 03/15/01 at 10:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/9/01] (cgar) Modified on 03/12/2001
March 9, 2001 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc. set 10:00 3/15/01 for Infineon Corp., for Infineon Holding, for Infineon Inc., for Infineon, for Infineon before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 9, 2001 Motion hearing re: [71-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products set at 9:00 3/14/01, [160-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of John M. Kinn set at 9:00 3/14/01, [158-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Dennis W. Carlton set at 9:00 3/14/01, [156-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Harry F. Manbeck, Jr. set at 9:00 3/14/01 (snea)
March 7, 2001 Filing 167 TRANSCRIPT for date of 03/06/01, before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 7, 2001 Filing 166 TRANSCRIPT for date of 02/06/01, before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 7, 2001 Filing 165 TRANSCRIPT for date of 01/26/01, before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar) Modified on 03/08/2001
March 7, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER denying [71-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products, granting in part, denying in part [78-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents, granting [76-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony Concerning Licensing Issues, (see order for further details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/7/01] (scoo)
March 7, 2001 Status Conference set at 1:00 3/8/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne actually this is a Trial Preparation Hearing (snea)
March 6, 2001 Filing 163 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for continuation of hearing on Defendants' Motions to Compel. Motions resolved in part; granted in part. Order to enter. (snea)
March 6, 2001 Filing 162 TRANSCRIPT for date of 02/28/01 before Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 6, 2001 Plaintiff's Exhibits Used in Markman Hearing in I Volume, rec'd. (snea)
March 5, 2001 Filing 161 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [160-1] motion in Limine to exclude expert testimony of John M. Kinn (FILED UNDER SEAL) (in envelope with #160) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 160 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of John M. Kinn (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 159 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [158-1] motion in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Dennis W. Carlton (FILED UNDER SEAL) (in envelope with #158) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 158 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Dennis W. Carlton (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 03/06/2001
March 5, 2001 Filing 157 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [156-1] motion in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Harry F. Manbeck, Jr. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(in envelope with #156) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 156 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude expert testimony of Harry F. Manbeck, Jr. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 155 Proposed Jury instructions by Rambus, Inc.(placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 154 Proposed Jury instructions by Infineon et al. (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 153 TRANSCRIPT for date of 02/28/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 5, 2001 Filing 152 TRANSCRIPT for date of 02/27/01 before the Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar)
March 2, 2001 Filing 151 Document(s) filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. Post-Markman hearing designation of deposition testimony of Dr. P. Michael Farmwald and Mr. Richard Crisp (scoo)
March 2, 2001 Defendant's Exhibits Used At Markman Hearing in 3 Vol. (Three Back Binders) rec'd. (snea)
March 1, 2001 Filing 150 TRANSCRIPT for date of 02/26/01 before Hon. Robert E. Payne (cgar) Modified on 03/01/2001
March 1, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER, (1) by 5:00PM on March 2, 2001, Plaintiff Rambus shall file its five page brief regarding deposition testimony of Richard Crisp and Paul Farmwald and shall be limited to references from those depositions; (2) by March 5, 2001 the parties shall file their jury instructions; (3) by March 5, 2001, Rambus shall file its Motions in Limine; (4) on March 5, 2001, the parties shall arrange a conference call with the court to discuss settlement; (5) the hearing on Infineon's Motions to Compel shall be continued to March 6, 2001 at 10:30 AM;(6) a trial strategy meeting shall be held on March 8, 2001 at 2:00PM; (7) by 9:00 AM on March 12, 2001, Infineon shall file its Responses to Rambus' Motions in Limine; (8) the hearing for Rambus' Motion for Summary Judgment on the RICO count, the hearings for the Motions in Limine, and the Final Pretrial Conference shall be held on the week of March 13, 2001; and (9) the trial is continued from March 13, 2001 to March 20, 2001 and shall continue for the week of March 26, 2001 and, if necessary, the week of April 2, 2001. ( signed by Judge James R. Spencer ) Copies Mailed: yes and fax [EOD Date: 3/1/01] (cgar)
March 1, 2001 Status Conference set at 2:00 3/8/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne actually this is time set for the Court and Counsel to set guidelines for the trial, time restraints etc., length of trial. Trial Preparation (snea)
March 1, 2001 Jury Trial set at 9:30 3/20/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
March 1, 2001 Motion hearing re: [78-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents set at 10:30 3/6/01, [76-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony Concerning Licensing Issues set at 10:30 3/6/01, [69-1] motion to Compel Deposition Testimony set at 10:30 3/6/01 (snea)
February 28, 2001 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [147-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Gerald Fahrad Masoudi to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57599, granting [146-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Mark Lee Kovner to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57599, granting [145-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Colin Ryle Kass to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57599, granting [144-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Thomas David Pease to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57598 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/28/01 ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar) Modified on 03/01/2001
February 28, 2001 Filing 148 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly and Tracy Stroh, (Chandler & Halasz) Court Reporters. Matter came on for Continuation of Markman Hearing. Defendants continued to adduce evidence; rested. Arguments had. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment heard; arguments had. Motion denied. Court adjourned at 6:40 p.m. (snea)
February 28, 2001 Filing 142 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 2/23/01 before The Hon. Robert E. Payne (scoo)
February 27, 2001 Filing 147 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Gerald Fahrad Masoudi to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57599 (scoo)
February 27, 2001 Filing 146 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Mark Lee Kovner to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57599 (scoo)
February 27, 2001 Filing 145 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Colin Ryle Kass to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57599 (scoo)
February 27, 2001 Filing 144 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Thomas David Pease to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 57598 (scoo)
February 27, 2001 Filing 143 Minute entry: Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Matter came on for continuaton of Markman Hearing. Plaintiff continued to adduce evidence; reste. Defendant adduced evidence. Court adjourned at 6:50 p.m. to return tommorrow at 10:00 a.m. for furhter hearing. (snea)
February 26, 2001 Filing 141 Minute entry: Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Matter came on for Markman Hearing. Plaintiff presented evidence to the Court. Court ajourned at 6:20 p.m. to return tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. (snea)
February 26, 2001 Filing 140 OBJECTIONS by defendant Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [120-1] exhibits list by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 26, 2001 Filing 139 Supplementation to Exhibit list by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (cgar)
February 26, 2001 Filing 138 OBJECTION by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. to [131-1] exhibits list by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon (cgar)
February 23, 2001 Filing 137 Rebuttal Exhibit list by Rambus, Inc. (khan)
February 23, 2001 Filing 136 Minute entry: Payne, J., Vickie Halasz, Chandler & Halasz, Court Reporter. Matter came on for hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel. Arguments had. The Court continued this hearing to be held at 2:00 p.m. on February 26, 2001. (snea)
February 22, 2001 Filing 135 Witness list by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (cgar)
February 22, 2001 Filing 134 CORRECTED prior Art Notice pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 282 by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 127 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [109-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine to exclude secondary indicia of nonobviousness (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 133 Prior Art Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 282 by defendants Infineon (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 132 Reply by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to Rambus'rebuttal Markman claim construction brief (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 131 Exhibit list by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 130 RESPONSE by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [115-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude certain evidence (A) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 129 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [117-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude testimony regarding the amount and value of Rambus' witnesses' shares of Rambus stock. (B) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 128 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [105-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to exclude expert testimony of David J. Teece (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 126 RESPONSE (of Non-Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [107-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine under Rule 408 (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 125 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [113-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon Rule 702 to exclude the testimony of Steven A. Przybylski (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 124 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [103-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to exclude expert testimony of Economist Richard T. Rapp beyond the scope of his expertise (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Joint Appendix of Exhibits in separate envelope - FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 123 Reply by Rambus, Inc. to Markman Brief concerning claim construction (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 122 RESPONSE (of non-opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [111-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine to exclude evidence regarding ADT (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 21, 2001 Filing 121 Initial Witness list by Rambus, Inc. (cgar) Modified on 02/23/2001
February 20, 2001 Filing 120 Initial Exhibit list by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 19, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER, that by 5:00pm Wednesday, 02/21/01, the parties are directed to file Reply briefs in response to the opposing party's Markman Response Memorandum. Briefs to meet requirements set-out in Order. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/19/01 ) Copies Mailed: yes and faxed to Brian Riopelle on 2/19 by Kelli Hamby [EOD Date: 2/20/01] (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 118 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [117-1] motion in Limine to exclude certain evidence (B) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (in same envelope with docket number 117) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 117 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude certain evidence (B) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 116 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [115-1] motion in Limine to exclude certain evidence (A) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (in same envelope with docket number 115) (cgar) Modified on 02/16/2001
February 15, 2001 Filing 115 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. in Limine to exclude certain evidence (A) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/16/2001
February 15, 2001 Filing 114 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [113-1] motion Rule 702 to exclude the testimony of Steven A. Przybylski) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (exhibits in separate envelope - filed under seal) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 113 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon Rule 702 to exclude the testimony of Steven A. Przybylski) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 112 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [111-1] motion in Limine to exclude evidence regarding ADT (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 111 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine to exclude evidence regarding ADT (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 110 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [109-1] motion in Limine to exclude secondary indicia of nonobviousness (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 109 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine to exclude secondary indicia of nonobviousness (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 108 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [107-1] motion in Limine under Rule 408 (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 107 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon in Limine under Rule 408 (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 106 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [105-1] motion to exclude expert testimony of David J. Teece (FILED UNDER SEAL) (exhibits in separate envelope - filed under seal) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 105 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to exclude expert testimony of David J. Teece (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 104 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [103-1] motion to exclude expert testimony of Economist Richard T. Rapp beyond the scope of his expertise (FILED UNDER SEAL) (exhibits filed under seal - in separate envelope) (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 103 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon to exclude expert testimony of Economist Richard T. Rapp beyond the scope of his expertise (cgar)
February 15, 2001 Filing 102 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [88-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants RICO claim (Count 14) (attached exhibits P-V) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 12, 2001 Filing 101 Response (in Opposition) by Infineon to [84-1] Markman Claim Construction brief by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
February 12, 2001 Filing 100 ANSWER by Rambus, Inc. to [59-2] counter claim by counter-claimant by Infineon et al., jury demand (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 12, 2001 Filing 99 Rambus Inc.'s Rebuttal Markman brief concerning claim construction (in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 02/13/2001
February 12, 2001 Filing 98 RESPONSE by Infineon to [88-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants RICO claim (Count 14) (FILED UNDER SEAL)(Exhibits 1-33 in separate envelope, FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 12, 2001 Motion hearing re: [85-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon for Partial Summary Judgment set at 2:00 2/26/01, [88-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants RICO claim (Count 14) set at 2:00 2/26/01, [71-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products set at 2:00 2/26/01 (snea)
February 9, 2001 Filing 97 REPLY to response to [78-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
February 9, 2001 Filing 96 REPLY to response to [76-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony Concerning Licensing Issues (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
February 8, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 95 STIPULATED ORDER concerning pretrial dates - see order for deadlines. (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/8/01] (cgar)
February 7, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER denying as moot [85-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon for Partial Summary Judgment Limiting Damages for Failure to Mark in Compliance with 35 USC 287, granting in part, denying in part plaintiff's [69-1] Motion to Compel Deposition, so that Plaintiffs may take further depositions pursuant to the Court's instructions requiring that the scope of the deposition be limited to determining the relevance of the activities of Advanced DRAM technologies and the basis for the claim of privilege. The defendant's oral motion to take additional deposition testimony from Richard Crisp is GRANTED, provided that the deposition remains reasonably related to the late discovered documents; the defendants' oral Motion to Unseal the Plaintiffs' Markman Brief is GRANTED; the hearing for Infineon's Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents and Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony concerning licensing issues shall be held on 2/23/01 at 2:30 p.m.; the Markman hearing and hearing on the motions for summary judgment shall be held on 2/26/01 beginning at 2:00 p.m. and continuing on 2/27 and the final pretrial conference is rescheduled from 3/2/01 to 2/27/01 immediately upon the conclusion of the Markman and summary judgment hearings, to continue on 2/28/01 if necessary. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed and faxed : y [EOD Date: 2/7/01] (khan)
February 6, 2001 Filing 93 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [78-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
February 6, 2001 Filing 92 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [76-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony Concerning Licensing Issues (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits in clear folder FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo) Modified on 02/07/2001
February 2, 2001 Filing 91 Proposed Trial Plan filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (scoo)
February 2, 2001 Filing 90 Submission regarding trial of the various claims and defenses filed by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (scoo)
February 1, 2001 Filing 89 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [88-1] motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants RICO claim (Count 14) (FILED UNDER SEAL) Exhibits in separate envelope (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 1, 2001 Filing 88 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants RICO claim (Count 14) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
February 1, 2001 Filing 87 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of its patent claim construction (exhibits a-k in brown expandable) (cgar)
February 1, 2001 Filing 86 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding in support of [85-1] motion for Partial Summary Judgment limiting damages for failure to mark in compliance with 35 U.S.C. section 287 (FILED UNDER SEAL) Appendix of exhibits filed in separate envelope- FILED UNDER SEAL (cgar) Modified on 02/01/2001
February 1, 2001 Filing 85 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon, Infineon for Partial Summary Judgment (cgar)
February 1, 2001 Filing 84 UNSEALED per ORDER of 2/7/01 - Markman Brief by Rambus, Inc. concerning claim construction (cgar) Modified on 02/07/2001
February 1, 2001 Filing 83 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [71-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 02/01/2001
January 29, 2001 Filing 82 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [71-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products (exhibits in separate envelope - FILED UNDER SEAL) FILED UNDER SEAL (cgar) Modified on 02/01/2001
January 29, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER denying [44-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Infineon's Counterclaims (Counts 8-14); denying [45-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Infineon's Affirmative Defenses (4,9, 10 and 11); denying [51-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., and Infineon for Summary Judgment of Equitable Estoppel (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 1/29/01] (rpiz)
January 26, 2001 Filing 81 MOTION for Jeffrey Shohet to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25 (khan) Modified on 01/29/2001
January 26, 2001 Filing 79 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. in support of [78-1] motion by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents FILED UNDER SEAL, Exhibits in black notebook FILED UNDER SEAL (khan) Modified on 01/29/2001
January 26, 2001 Filing 78 MOTION by Infineon Inc., Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents FILED UNDER SEAL (khan) Modified on 01/29/2001
January 26, 2001 Filing 77 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. in support of [76-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony Concerning Licensing Issues FILED UNDER SEAL, Exhibits in black notebook FILED UNDER SEAL (khan) Modified on 01/29/2001
January 26, 2001 Filing 76 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon to Compel Deposition Testimony Concerning Licensing Issues FILED UNDER SEAL (khan)
January 26, 2001 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [81-1] motion for Jeffrey Shohet to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (khan)
January 26, 2001 Filing 75 Minute entry: Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for hearing on motions. Defendant's Motin to Admit Jeffrey Shahet, Esquire Pro Hac Vice granted. Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Counterclaims and Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment Patent Infrigement Counterclaims heard. Arguments had. For the reasons stated on the record the motions are denied. (snea)
January 25, 2001 Filing 74 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [69-1] motion to Compel Deposition Testimony (FILED UNDER SEAL) (jlil)
January 22, 2001 Filing 73 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [69-1] motion to Compel Deposition Testimony by Rambus, Inc. With black binder of exhibits A-H (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 01/23/2001
January 18, 2001 Filing 72 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [71-1] motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-Q - FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 01/19/2001
January 18, 2001 Filing 71 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Equitable Estoppel Affirmative Defense Relating to Defendants' DDR SDRAM Products (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
January 16, 2001 Filing 70 REPLY by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to response to [51-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., and Infineon for Summary Judgment of Equitable Estoppel (FILED UNDER SEAL) (RECEIVED IN CHAMBERS ON 01/15/01) (w/Appendix UNDER SEAL rec'd 1/16/01) (cgar) Modified on 01/17/2001
January 11, 2001 Filing 69 MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Deposition Testimony (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 01/12/2001
January 11, 2001 Filing 68 Substituted First Amended Answer to first amd/cmp and counterclaims by defendants Infineon, Infineon and Infineon Holding [19-1] amended complaint by Rambus, Inc. against plaintiff Rambus, Inc.; jury demand (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
January 11, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER, that Defendants may file the Substituted First Amended Answer, under seal; Plaintiff will not be required to file a response to the First Amended Answer or the Substituted First Amended Answer, as the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike filed by Rambus are sufficient responses, until otherwise ordered by the Court. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 1/11/01] (cgar)
January 10, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER that time for defts to file and serve their reply in support of its Motion for Sum Judg. on Equitable Estoppel is extended to 1-15-01 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 1/10/01] (clerk)
January 10, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER mooting [48-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon for Rule 56(f), mooting [39-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Patent Infringement Counterclaims (Counts 5-7) by agreement of parties ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 1/10/01] (clerk)
January 10, 2001 Deft's substituted 1st Amended Answer and Counterclaims to Rambus' 1st Amended Complaint recd with sketch order. (clerk)
January 9, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER denying [61-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon Technologies, Infineon Technologies North America to Modify Plaintiff's Rule 45 Subpoenae Directed to Ken McGhee and John Kelly (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: yes and sent by fax [EOD Date: 1/9/01] (cgar)
January 8, 2001 Filing 63 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [51-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., and Infineon for Summary Judgment of Equitable Estoppel. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS, VOLUMES 1-3 ALSO FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
January 8, 2001 Filing 62 MEMORANDUM by Infineon Technologies, Infineon Technologies North America and Infineon Holding in support of [61-1] motion to Modify Plaintiff's Rule 45 Subpoenae Directed to Ken McGhee and John Kelly (cgar)
January 8, 2001 Filing 61 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon Technologies, Infineon Technologies North America to Modify Plaintiff's Rule 45 Subpoenae Directed to Ken McGhee and John Kelly (cgar)
January 4, 2001 Filing 60 NOTICE that Rambus' motion for summary judgment on Infineon's Patent Infringement Counterclaims (Counts 5-7) is Moot by Infineon, Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL) (scoo)
January 3, 2001 Filing 59 First Amended ANSWER to First Amended Complaint; jury demand and COUNTERCLAIMS by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. (Attorney Brian Charles Riopelle) against Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL PER LETTER RECEIVED FROM COUNSEL ON 01/04/01) SUBSTITUTED PER ORDER ENTERED ON 1/11/01 - SEE DOCKET ENTRY #68 (cgar) Modified on 01/11/2001
December 29, 2000 Filing 58 REPLY (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to response to [39-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Patent Infringement Counterclaims (Counts 5-7) (FILED UNDER SEAL)(Proposed order placed on left) (cgar) Modified on 01/02/2001
December 29, 2000 Filing 57 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [45-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Infineon's Affirmative Defenses (4,9, 10 and 11), [44-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Infineon's Counterclaims (Counts 8-14) (cgar) Modified on 01/02/2001
December 28, 2000 Filing 56 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for David Pendarvis to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56883 (cgar)
December 28, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER, that the number of non-party, non-expert depositions is enlarged to fifteen (15) per side. (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/28/00] (cgar)
December 28, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER, the parties will exchange a list of the claim terms in dispute from all the patents-in-suit at noon on January 29, 2001;Opening Markman briefs will be served and filed on all terms in dispute by February 1, 2001; Expert discovery closes on February 9, 2001; Opposition Markman briefs shall be served and filed by February 12, 2001; Demonstrative exhibits prepared or to be used by expert witnesses as well as all other demonstratives shall be exchange by noon on March 9, 2001; Objections to demonstratives shall be made by noon on March 12, 2001...(see Order for detail) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/28/00] (cgar)
December 28, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [56-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for David Pendarvis to Appear Pro Hac Vice (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (rpiz)
December 22, 2000 Filing 53 RESPONSE (Opposition) by Infineon, Infineon Corp., and Infineon Holding to [44-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Infineon's Counterclaims (Counts 8-14), [45-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Infineon's Affirmative Defenses (4,9, 10 and 11) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (bound exhibits also FILED UNDER SEAL) (rpiz)
December 22, 2000 Filing 52 MEMORANDUM by Infineon, Infineon Corp., and Infineon Holding in support of [51-1] motion by Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., and Infineon for Summary Judgment on Equitable Estoppel (FILED UNDER SEAL) (bound exhibits to memorandum FILED UNDER SEAL) (rpiz)
December 22, 2000 Filing 51 MOTION by Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., and Infineon for Summary Judgment of Equitable Estoppel (proposed Order placed on left side of file) (rpiz) Modified on 12/26/2000
December 21, 2000 Filing 50 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 12/18/00 (cgar) Modified on 01/25/2001
December 19, 2000 Filing 49 Response by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding to [42-1] Brief in Support of Rambus Inc.'s 30(B)(6) Deposition of Infineon on JEDEC-Related Topics by Rambus, Inc. (khan)
December 18, 2000 Filing 48 MOTION by Infineon, Infineon for Rule 56(f) (scoo)
December 18, 2000 Filing 48 RESPONSE by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. to [39-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Patent Infringement Counterclaims (Counts 5-7), with attached exhibits A-D. (EXHIBIT A FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 12/19/2000
December 15, 2000 Filing 47 TRANSCRIPT of conference call for date of 11/28/00 before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (rpiz)
December 11, 2000 Filing 46 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [45-1] motion to Strike Infineon's Affirmative Defenses (4,9, 10 and 11), [44-1] to Dismiss Infineon's Counterclaims (Counts 8-14) (Exhibits A-I placed in brown expandable) (cgar) Modified on 12/12/2000
December 11, 2000 Filing 45 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Infineon's Affirmative Defenses (4,9, 10 and 11) (cgar)
December 11, 2000 Filing 44 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Infineon's Counterclaims (Counts 8-14) (cgar)
December 11, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER vacating [38-1] order of 11/28/00. For the reasons set forth on the record on 11/28/00 it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice as moot in perspective of Defendant's filing of an Answer and Counterclaim to the Amended Complaint. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 12/11/00] (khan) Modified on 12/12/2000
December 11, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [41-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for John Michael Guaragna to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 receipt #56727 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: (khan) Modified on 12/12/2000
December 8, 2000 Filing 42 Brief in Support of Rambus Inc.'s Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of Infineon on JEDEC-Related Topics filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (khan)
December 6, 2000 Filing 41 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for John Michael Guaragna to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 (cgar)
December 5, 2000 Filing 40 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [39-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Patent Infringement Counterclaims (Counts 5-7) (Exhibits to Exhibit 1 FILED UNDER SEAL) (rpiz)
December 5, 2000 Filing 39 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Patent Infringement Counterclaims (Counts 5-7) (rpiz)
November 29, 2000 Motion hearing re: [11-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Counts 3 through 8 of the Counterclaim set at 1:00 1/26/01 (snea)
November 29, 2000 Settlement Conference set on 9:00 1/19/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
November 29, 2000 Status Conference set at 9:00 1/18/01 before Judge Robert E. Payne actually this is a tutorial session, counsel to inform the court regarding technical matters to be brought ou at trial (snea)
November 29, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [36-1] motion by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Todd Matthew Friedman to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Filing Fee Paid $25.00, Receipt #56554 (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (rpiz)
November 29, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [35-1] motion by InfineonTechnologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Yosef Judah Riemer to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Filing Fee Paid $25.00, Receipt #56554 (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Mailed: y (rpiz)
November 29, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [37-1] motion by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Maxine Yvette Graham to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Filing Fee Paid $25.00, Receipt #56554 (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (rpiz)
November 28, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 38 VACATED 12/11/00 - ORDER denying [11-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Counts 3 through 8 of the Counterclaim; the Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice as moot in perspective of Plaintiff's filing of an Amended Complaint (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 11/29/00] (rpiz) Modified on 12/11/2000
November 27, 2000 Filing 37 MOTION by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Maxine Yvette Graham to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56554 (cgar)
November 27, 2000 Filing 36 MOTION by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Todd Matthew Friedman to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56554 (cgar)
November 27, 2000 Filing 35 MOTION by InfineonTechnologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Yosef Judah Riemer to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56554 (cgar)
November 21, 2000 Filing 34 ANSWER to Complaint; jury demand and COUNTERCLAIM by Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding against Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Modified on 11/22/2000
November 14, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [33-1] Stipulation Regarding Location of Depositions (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: y (rpiz)
November 9, 2000 Filing 33 STIPULATION Regarding Location of Depositions filed by Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, and Infineon Corp. (rpiz) Modified on 11/13/2000
November 8, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER that the time for the Original Defendants, Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America Corp., to answer or respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to November 21, 2000. , reset Answer deadline to 11/21/00 for Infineon, for Infineon ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 11/8/00] (khan)
November 7, 2000 Filing 31 Agreed Statement of Pending Motions filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon Inc., defendant Infineon Holding, defendant Infineon Corp. (khan)
November 3, 2000 Filing 30 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. 11/1/00 (jlil)
November 3, 2000 Filing 29 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [12-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike, [11-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss (jlil)
November 3, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [28-1] motion by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Clifford Eugene Wilkins to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $25.00 Receipt # 56308 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
November 3, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [27-1] motion by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for John Michael Desmarais to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56308 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
November 2, 2000 Filing 28 MOTION by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for Clifford Eugene Wilkins to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56308 (cgar)
November 2, 2000 Filing 27 MOTION by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. for John Michael Desmarais to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56308 (cgar)
November 2, 2000 Filing 26 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Rambus, Inc. (cgar)
November 1, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER that the hearing for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be set for 12/7/00 at 11:00 am; the Tutorial Session shall be set for 1/19/01 at 9:00 am (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/31/00) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 11/1/00] (rpiz)
November 1, 2000 Motion hearing re: [11-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss set at 11:00 12/7/00 (snea)
October 27, 2000 Filing 24 RESPONSE by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. to [12-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike, [11-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss (exhibits A-J placed in redweld) (cgar) Modified on 10/30/2000
October 27, 2000 Filing 23 RESPONSE by Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. to [13-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for More Definite Statement (cgar)
October 23, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [22-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Alexander Hilton Rogers to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56170 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (jlil)
October 23, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [21-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for David Emory Monahan to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56170 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (jlil)
October 23, 2000 Opinion or Order So Ordered: granting [20-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Sean C. Cunningham to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56171 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (jlil)
October 20, 2000 Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Rambus, Inc. amending [1-1] complaint against Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp.; jury demand (cgar)
October 20, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting [15-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, and the Clerk is directed to file the First Amended Complaint; the time for the defendants to file their response to the plaintiff's Motion to Strike, Motion for More Definite Statement and the Motion to Dismiss is extended to and including October 27, 2000; the plaintiff's reply shall be filed on November 3, 2000; oral argument on the motions will be heard on November 21, 2000 at 2:00 p.m.;the parties shall file on November 7, 2000, an agreed statement identifying which, if any, motions have been eliminated by virtue of the more definite statement which the defendants indicated at the Inital Pretrial Conference it intends to file on Ocober 27, 2000 and identifying the issues left to be decided after the filing of the more definite state; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 10/20/00] (cgar)
October 19, 2000 Filing 22 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Alexander Hilton Rogers to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56170 (cgar)
October 19, 2000 Filing 21 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for David Emory Monahan to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56170 (cgar)
October 19, 2000 Filing 20 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Sean C. Cunningham to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 56171 (cgar)
October 19, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PRETRIAL ORDER filed Jury Trial date 9:30 3/13/01 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (snea)
October 19, 2000 Pre-Trial Conference held (snea)
October 19, 2000 Final Pre-trial Conference as to Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc. set 9:00 3/2/01 for Infineon, for Infineon before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
October 18, 2000 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [15-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (First Amended Complaint placed on left side of case file pending ruling of the court) (scoo)
October 18, 2000 Filing 15 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (scoo)
October 13, 2000 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Rambus, Inc. in support of [13-1] motion for More Definite Statement [12-1] to Strike [11-1] to Dismiss (exhibits in brown expandable) (scoo)
October 13, 2000 Filing 13 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for More Definite Statement (scoo)
October 13, 2000 Filing 12 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Strike (scoo)
October 13, 2000 Filing 11 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Dismiss Counts 3 through 8 of the Counterclaim (scoo) Modified on 11/29/2000
October 13, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Protective Order ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed yes (cgar) Modified on 10/13/2000
October 13, 2000 **Set Protective Order Flag. (cgar)
October 3, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER setting Pretrial Conference for 9:15 10/19/00 ; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y (snea)
September 26, 2000 Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Infineon, Infineon (jlil)
September 25, 2000 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint; jury demand and COUNTERCLAIM by Infineon, Infineon against Rambus, Inc. (jlil)
September 21, 2000 Notice of Judge Payne's Interest in 9th & Cary Associates sent to all counsel of record (clerk)
September 20, 2000 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Infineon Technologies North America Corp. (clerk)
September 20, 2000 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Infineon, Infineon (no answer due date calculated. Atty's computer generated waiver does not contain mailing date.) (clerk)
September 8, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that time for defts to answer extended to 9-22-00; Defts' objections to pltf's 1st set of interrogatories and requests for production to be served by 9-18-00 and responses by 10-6-00 pltf's objections to defts' 1st set of interrogatories and production requests to be served by 9-20-00 and responses to be served by 10-9-00, reset Answer deadline to 9/22/00 for Infineon, for Infineon ( signed 9-7-00 by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 9/8/00] (clerk) Modified on 09/08/2000
September 7, 2000 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Infineon, Infineon (computer generated form does not contain date request was sent - no answer date can be calculated) (clerk)
August 23, 2000 SUMMONS(ES) issued for Infineon, Infineon (3 issued for Infineon Technologies AG and 1 issued for Infineon Technologies North America Corp.) (clerk)
August 16, 2000 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that case reassigned to Judge Payne ( signed by Judge Richard L. Williams ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 8/16/00](clerk) Modified on 08/16/2000
August 16, 2000 CASE reassigned to Judge Robert E. Payne (clerk)
August 15, 2000 SUMMONS(ES) issued for Infineon Technologies North America Corp.(only) & given to process server. (clerk) Modified on 08/21/2000
August 10, 2000 Form sent to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (khan)
August 9, 2000 Jury Trial Flag (khan)
August 8, 2000 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Filing Fee $ 150 Receipt # 55428; jury demand (khan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rambus, Inc., et al v. Infineon, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rambus, Inc.
Represented By: Martin Douglas Bern
Represented By: Michael W. Smith
Represented By: Peter Andrew Detre
Represented By: Sarah Kurtin
Represented By: Sean Paul Gates
Represented By: Steven M. Perry
Represented By: Tamerlin Jane Godley
Represented By: Rowland Braxton Hill, IV
Represented By: Alexander H. Rogers
Represented By: Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke
Represented By: Catherine Florence Augustson
Represented By: Gregory Paul Stone
Represented By: Hojoon Hwang
Represented By: John Michael Guaragna
Represented By: Kelly Max Klaus
Represented By: Lynn Healy Scaduto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Infineon Technologies AG
Represented By: Brian Charles Riopelle
Represented By: Charles Torrence Armstrong
Represented By: Christian Chadd Taylor
Represented By: Jeanne Marie Heffernan
Represented By: John Michael Desmarais
Represented By: John Caviness O'Quinn
Represented By: Michael Aaron Fisher
Represented By: Michael Peter Stadnick
Represented By: Paul Arthur Bondor
Represented By: Richard Michael Koehl
Represented By: Robert Michael Tyler
Represented By: Scott Richard Samay
Represented By: Steven John Lever
Represented By: Warren Eugene Zirkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
Represented By: John Michael Desmarais
Represented By: John Caviness O'Quinn
Represented By: Michael Aaron Fisher
Represented By: Michael Peter Stadnick
Represented By: Paul Arthur Bondor
Represented By: Richard Michael Koehl
Represented By: Robert Michael Tyler
Represented By: Scott Richard Samay
Represented By: Steven John Lever
Represented By: Warren Eugene Zirkle
Represented By: Brian Charles Riopelle
Represented By: Charles Torrence Armstrong
Represented By: Christian Chadd Taylor
Represented By: Jeanne Marie Heffernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Infineon Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Christian Chadd Taylor
Represented By: Jeanne Marie Heffernan
Represented By: John Caviness O'Quinn
Represented By: Michael Aaron Fisher
Represented By: Michael Peter Stadnick
Represented By: Paul Arthur Bondor
Represented By: Richard Michael Koehl
Represented By: Scott Richard Samay
Represented By: Steven John Lever
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Infineon Technologies Holding North America Corp.
Represented By: Brian Charles Riopelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Infineon Technologies Corp.
Represented By: Brian Charles Riopelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Micron Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Frederick Witthoefft
Represented By: Bruce R. Genderson
Represented By: Fred H. Bartlit, Jr.
Represented By: Frederick L. Cottrell
Represented By: Matthew D. Powers
Represented By: Richard L. Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Hynix Semiconductor, Inc.
Represented By: Dana Johannes Finberg
Represented By: David James Sensenig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP
Represented By: Philip Browder Morris
Represented By: Gregory Scott Williams
Represented By: James W. Morris, III
Represented By: Michael Robert Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP
Represented By: Bert Charles Reiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: American Lawyer Media, Inc.
Represented By: Ellen D. Marcus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?