R.M. Harrison Mechanical Corp. v. Decker Industries, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: R.M. Harrison Mechanical Corp.
Defendant: Decker Industries, Inc. and Spruance Genco, LLC.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00310
Filed: May 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Chesterfield
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Williams
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R.M. Harrison Mechanical Corp. v. Decker Industries, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R.M. Harrison Mechanical Corp.
Represented By: Robert Lee Harris, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Decker Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen M. Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spruance Genco, LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?