Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
Plaintiff: Timothy R. Martin
Defendant: Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00417
Filed: July 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Williams
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 150 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/17/09. (lsal) (Copy mailed)
January 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/7/09. (lsal) (Copy mailed to plaintiff; sent ECF to counsel of record)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy R. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?