Versatile v. Johnson et al
| Lord Versatile |
| Gene Johnson, John Jabe, Benjamin A. Wright, W. D. Jennings, Loretta Kelly and A. David Robinson |
| 3:2009cv00120 |
| February 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Sussex |
| Richard L. Williams |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER: Versatile's Objections 108 are OVERRULED and the 105 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; Versatile's 109 Motion for Relief from Judgment and 110 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 111 Motion for Preli minary Injunction are DENIED; Versatile's claims and the action are DISMISSED. Versatile may appeal the decision of the Court by filing a written Notice of Appeal within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/26/2011. Copes mailed. (lhin, )
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/28/11. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM ORDER; Court CORRECTS the reference to Plaintiff's Claim Two on Page One of the December 31, 2009 Order (see order for details). Signed by District Judge Richard L. Williams on 1/21/2010. Copy sent to the Petitioner as directed.(lhin, )
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Richard L. Williams on 12/31/09. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
