WIAV Solutions LLC v. Motorola, Inc. et al
WIAV Solutions LLC |
Motorola, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., Palm, Inc., Personal Communications Devices LLC, Personal Communications Devices Holdings, LLC, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., UTSTARCOM, Inc. and Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. |
3:2009cv00447 |
July 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Fairfax |
Robert E. Payne |
Plaintiff |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 628 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. ORDERED that the claim terms be defined as stated. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 8/8/2011. (rban, ) |
Filing 467 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 8/11/10. (lsal) |
Filing 464 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 8/10/10. (lsal) |
Filing 267 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/29/10. (lsal) |
Filing 247 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/8/10. (lsal) |
Filing 199 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/17/2009. (lhin, ) |
Filing 122 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/20/09. (kyou, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.