Kersey v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff: Brenda Kersey
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Case Number: 3:2009cv00726
Filed: November 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Henrico
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Williams
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Richard L. Williams on 8/13/10. (lsal)
January 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Richard L. Williams on 1/21/10 (lsal) (Copies mailed: yes)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kersey v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda Kersey
Represented By: Henry W. McLaughlin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Michael Ya'akov Kieval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?