Credit Control Services, Inc. v. Corliss Moore & Associates, LLC

Movant: Credit Control Services, Inc.
Respondent: Corliss Moore & Associates, LLC
Case Number: 3:2013cv00115
Filed: February 26, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Richmond City
Presiding Judge: James R. Spencer
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 4, 2013 8 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 9/4/2013. Copies to counsel.(cmcc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Credit Control Services, Inc. v. Corliss Moore & Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Credit Control Services, Inc.
Represented By: Mark Richard Colombell
Represented By: William Daniel Prince, IV
Represented By: David Richard Ruby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Corliss Moore & Associates, LLC
Represented By: Mark J. Krudys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.