Birdsong v. Ponton
Petitioner: Charles A. Birdsong
Respondent: Henry Ponton
Case Number: 3:2014cv00131
Filed: February 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Wise
Presiding Judge: M. Hannah Lauck
Presiding Judge: James R. Spencer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 9/27/2016. Copy mailed to Pro Se Petitioner. (jsmi, )
March 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 3/10/2015. (sbea, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Birdsong v. Ponton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles A. Birdsong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Henry Ponton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?