Green v. Withrow
Plaintiff: Antwan Ray Green
Defendant: M. T. Withrow
Case Number: 3:2014cv00181
Filed: March 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Fairfax
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Payne
Presiding Judge: M. Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/23/2016. Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff. (jsmi, )
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/15/2015. Copy of Memorandum Opinion was mailed to Plaintiff and electronically sent to counsel. (sbea, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Withrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antwan Ray Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. T. Withrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?