Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. |
| NVIDIA Corporation, Velocity Micro, Inc. and Velocity Holdings, LLC |
| 3:2014cv00757 |
| November 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Richmond Office |
| Richmond City |
| Robert E. Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
832
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 03/14/2016. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing
829
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/29/2016. (ccol, )
|
|
Filing
822
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/23/2016. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing
735
MEMORANDUM OPINION - This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANTS' MOTION TOSUPPLEMENT DEFENDANTS' WITNESS LIST 677 . For theforegoing reasons, the motion has been denied (see ORDER, 692 ). SEE OPINION FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 01/27/2016. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing
602
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/16/2015. Memorandum Opinion electronically sent to all counsel of record. (sbea, )
|
|
Filing
221
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 07/30/2015. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 04/03/2015. (tjoh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
