Board v. AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.
Appellant: Emiko Board
Appellee: AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv00822
Filed: December 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Roanoke
Presiding Judge: John A. Gibney
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 6/26/2015. Opinion was electronically sent to all counsel of record. Copy of Opinion was also mailed to John Henry Maddock, III, McGuireWoods LLP, 901 E. Cary Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4030. (sbea, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Board v. AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Emiko Board
Represented By: Travis Alan Knobbe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.
Represented By: John Henry Maddock, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?