Rideout v. Clarke

Rideout v. Clarke

Petitioner:	Marvin Rideout
Respondent:	Harold Clarke
Case Number:	3:2016cv00190
Filed:	March 30, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Richmond Office
County:	New Kent
Presiding Judge:	M. Hannah Lauck
Presiding Judge:	David J. Novak
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 28, 2017	Filing 27 ORDER in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED 1. The Report and Recommendation 18 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 5 is GRANTED; 3. Rideout's § 2254 Petition (ECF No. 1) and Amended § 2254 Petition 22 are DENIED; 4. Rideout's original Motion for Leave (ECF No. 14) is DENIED; 5. Rideout's Motion for Leave 21 and Motion to Amend 22 are GRANTED; 5. Rideout's claims and the action are DISMISSE D; and, 6. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Rideout desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk ofthe Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 02/28/2017. Order mailed to Petitioner as directed. (ccol, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 28, 2017

Filing 27 ORDER in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED 1. The Report and Recommendation 18 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 5 is GRANTED; 3. Rideout's § 2254 Petition (ECF No. 1) and Amended § 2254 Petition 22 are DENIED; 4. Rideout's original Motion for Leave (ECF No. 14) is DENIED; 5. Rideout's Motion for Leave 21 and Motion to Amend 22 are GRANTED; 5. Rideout's claims and the action are DISMISSE D; and, 6. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Rideout desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk ofthe Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 02/28/2017. Order mailed to Petitioner as directed. (ccol, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rideout v. Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Marvin Rideout
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Represented By:	Rosemary Bourne
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?