Testamark v. Colvin

Testamark v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Carlyn T. Testamark
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	3:2016cv00202
Filed:	April 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Richmond Office
County:	Petersburg City
Presiding Judge:	Robert E. Payne
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 11, 2017	Filing 20 ORDER that (1) The plaintiff's OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF No. 18 ) are overruled; (2) The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 14 ) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (3) The plaintiff's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR REMAND (ECF Nos. 7 and 8 is denied; (4) The DEFENDANT' s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 10 ) is granted; and (5) The Commissioner's decision is affirmed. It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/11/2017. (sbea, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 11, 2017

Filing 20 ORDER that (1) The plaintiff's OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF No. 18 ) are overruled; (2) The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 14 ) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (3) The plaintiff's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR REMAND (ECF Nos. 7 and 8 is denied; (4) The DEFENDANT' s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 10 ) is granted; and (5) The Commissioner's decision is affirmed. It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/11/2017. (sbea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Testamark v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlyn T. Testamark
Represented By:	Joel C. Cunningham, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Jonathan Holland Hambrick(Designation US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?