Perry v. Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court
Albert Lewis Perry, Jr |
Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court |
3:2017cv00687 |
October 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Chesterfield |
Henry E. Hudson |
Roderick C. Young |
Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/28/2017. Copy mailed to pro se petitioner. (tjoh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perry v. Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Albert Lewis Perry, Jr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.