Cramer v. Arkesia, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Hannah Cramer
Defendant: Arkesia, Inc., Circle 2, Inc., Imaginary Images, Inc., M.G.B., Inc., William Andreas Pyliaris and and/or any other entities affiliated with or Controlled by Club Rouge; Daddy Rabbits; Candy Bar; Paper Moon; or Pure Pleasure
Case Number: 3:2018cv00039
Filed: January 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Richmond City
Presiding Judge: Henry E. Hudson
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cramer v. Arkesia, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hannah Cramer
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: Justin Patrick Keating
Represented By: LaDonna Marie Lusher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arkesia, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Michael Lucas
Represented By: Milena Radovic
Represented By: Kristina H. Vaquera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Circle 2, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Michael Lucas
Represented By: Milena Radovic
Represented By: Kristina H. Vaquera
Represented By: Thomas Michael Lucas
Represented By: Milena Radovic
Represented By: Kristina H. Vaquera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Imaginary Images, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Michael Lucas
Represented By: Milena Radovic
Represented By: Kristina H. Vaquera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M.G.B., Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Michael Lucas
Represented By: Milena Radovic
Represented By: Kristina H. Vaquera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Andreas Pyliaris
Represented By: Thomas Michael Lucas
Represented By: Milena Radovic
Represented By: Kristina H. Vaquera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: and/or any other entities affiliated with or Controlled by Club Rouge; Daddy Rabbits; Candy Bar; Paper Moon; or Pure Pleasure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?