Carter v. Kincaid
Plaintiff: Albert Carter
Defendant: Stacey Kincaid
Case Number: 3:2018cv00468
Filed: July 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Fairfax
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Referring Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION (LETTER) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Albert Carter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(ccol, )
July 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stacey Kincaid, filed by Albert Carter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(ccol, )
July 6, 2018 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge was checked "YES" on the 1983 form by Albert Carter. (ccol, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Kincaid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacey Kincaid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?