Taylor v. Virginia Employment Commission
April Taylor |
Virginia Employment Commission |
3:2018cv00502 |
July 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Petersburg City |
John A Gibney |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER that the Court DIRECTS the plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 days of this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint within 21 days will result in dismissal of the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b). It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 8/30/2018. Order was sent electronically as well as via U.S. Mail to Plaintiff. (sbea, ) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT filed by April Taylor against Virginia Employment Commission. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P). (sbea, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the plaintiff, April Taylor, has made a showing of her inability to pay the required fees and the Court therefore GRANTS the Motion and DIRECTS the Clerk to file the Complaint attached to the Motion. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Due to the minimal facts alleged and the lack of clarity on the source of the plaintiffs claims, the Court hereby DIRECTS the plaintiff to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Once filed, the particularized complaint will become the operative complaint in this case. Failure to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days or comply strictly with the requirements set forth above will result in dismissal of the case. See Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b). See Order for complete details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 7/31/2018. Order was electronically sent to Plaintiff. (sbea, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 7/24/2018. (sbea, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by April Taylor. (sbea, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by April Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P). (sbea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taylor v. Virginia Employment Commission | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Virginia Employment Commission | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: April Taylor | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.