Gorrell v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Gorrell
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2018cv00538
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Richmond City
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2018 Filing 6 Corrected Summonses Reissued as to U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for the U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA. Please ensure that your process server returns the additional copy of the summons for the U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA (executed or unexecuted) on paper to the Clerk's Office.
August 17, 2018 Filing 5 Proposed Amended Summons as to the U.S. Attorney for EDVA by Patricia A. Gorrell. (Lutkenhaus, Gerald). Modified docket entry on 08/20/2018. (walk, ).
August 17, 2018 Filing 4 Proposed Amended Summons as to the U.S. Attorney General by Patricia A. Gorrell. (Lutkenhaus, Gerald). Modified docket entry on 08/20/2018. (walk, ).
August 17, 2018 Filing 3 Letter re: Change of Address for Plaintiff. (Lutkenhaus, Gerald). Modified docket entry on 08/20/2018. (walk, ).
August 7, 2018 Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the Defendant, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA. Please ensure that your process server returns the additional copy of the summons for the Defendant, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for EDVA (executed or unexecuted) on paper to the Clerk's Office. (walk, )
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Patricia A. Gorrell against Nancy A. Berryhill. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-6214622). (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (walk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gorrell v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Gorrell
Represented By: Gerald Gregory Lutkenhaus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?