Simpson v. Supreme Court Of Virginia et al
James Simpson |
Supreme Court Of Virginia and Judge Donald W. Lemons |
3:2018cv00547 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Brunswick |
John A Gibney |
Roderick C Young |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Simpson. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 4 Consent to Collection of Fees by James Simpson. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by James Simpson (tjoh, ) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for more details and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 08/27/2018. Forms mailed to Prisoner: IFP, Consent to Collection Forms and Memorandum Order. Inmate Account Form mailed to Institution. (ccol, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document, #2 Envelope).(ccol, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.