Onafeko v. Government of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland et al
| David Abiodun K.G.B. Onafeko |
| Ministry of Justice, United Kingdom, Government of The United Kingdom of Great Britian And Northern Ireland, Department for Works and Pensions, United Kingdom, Swift Advances Plc, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland, Bank of Scotland, Lloyds Banking Group, Halifax Insurance Ireland Limited, Ministry of Health, United Kingdom, Crown Prosecution Service, United Kingdom, Department of Justice, Equality & Law Reform, Ireland, Government of The Republic of Ireland, The Scotish Government, National Health Service, United Kingdom and Government of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 3:2018cv00624 |
| September 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 USCA 42(b) Mandate re #5 Notice of Appeal. This court's order dismissing this appeal pursuant to Local Rule 42(b) takes effect today. This constitutes the formal mandate of this court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (tdai, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by David Abiodun K.G.B. Onafeko. Upon consideration of the motion to voluntarily dismiss this case pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court grants the motion. (tdai, )
|
| USCA Case Number 18-2188; USCA Case Manager: T. Fischer for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by David Abiodun K.G.B. Onafeko. (tdai, ) |
| Filing 6 Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #5 Notice of Appeal (All case opening forms, plus the transcript guidelines, may be obtained from the Fourth Circuit's website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov) (tdai, ) |
| Assembled INITIAL Electronic Record Transmitted to 4CCA re #5 Notice of Appeal (tdai, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL by David Abiodun K.G.B. Onafeko re: #4 Order. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Statement, #2 Exhibit B and #3 Letter from Plaintiff). NO FILING FEE PAID. (walk, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #1 is denied without prejudice, because plaintiff reports neither income nor obligations and it is impossible to live without some income. Thus, the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cannot be relied on. Plaintiff advised of right to file a written notice of appeal within thirty (30) days of date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 9/26/18. (Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff Onafeko). (jtho)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing for later filing once IFP is resolved (please see Order for additional information. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 09/13/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION by David Abiodun K.G.B. Onafeko for Pro Se E-Noticing. (walk, ) |
| Filing 1 Application by David Abiodun K.G.B. Onafeko to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit DAKGB-090718-01, #3 Local Civil Rule 83.1 (M) Certification Form and #4 Letter from Plaintiff). (walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
