Hood v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: William Curtis Hood
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2018cv00689
Filed: October 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 7/20/2018. (sbea, )
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (sbea, )
November 14, 2018 Filing 6 Certificate Reporting Service; Nancy A. Berryhill served on 10/26/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (sbea, )
November 5, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of SSA, the Attorney General of the United States, and the United States Attorney. (sbea, )
October 15, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Attorney General. Clerk placed Summons in U.S. Marshals box for service. (sbea, ). Clerk corrected information on Summons on 10/26/2018. Corrected Summons were placed in the U.S. Marshals box for service. Modified docket text on 10/26/2018 (sbea, ).
October 15, 2018 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by William Curtis Hood against Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeals Council Action - Redacted, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (sbea, )
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Court's filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the Complaint and shall issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 10/15/2018. (sbea, )
October 10, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Curtis Hood. (Attachments: #1 Motion for In Forma Pauperis, #2 Proposed Order for In Forma Pauperis, #3 Proposed Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Notice of Appeals Council Action - Redacted). (sbea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hood v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Jonathan Holland Hambrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Curtis Hood
Represented By: Corey Reece Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?