Breen et al v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
| Kevin Stevenson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC |
| Robert R. Breen, Jr. and Tammy L. Breen |
| USBC-Richmond (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
| 3:2018cv00759 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Appellant's BRIEF by Robert R. Breen, Jr, Tammy L. Breen. (Conway, Martin) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable as to Kevin Stevenson. (Attachment: #1 Returned Letter). (sbea, ) |
| Filing 4 Bankruptcy Transmittal Cover Sheet with Designation of Record. (Attachments: #1 Appelant's Designation of Record) (smej, ) |
| Filing 3 Letter from the Clerk sent to Kevin Stevenson, CEO regarding local counsel. Copy of Rule 83.1 sent. (smej, ) |
| Filing 2 Letter from the Clerk sent to Appellant's attorney, Martin C. Conway, and Kevin Stevenson, CEO regarding Bankruptcy Appeal filed in USDC. Copy of Rule 8018 sent to parties. (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 14-34916-KRH, filed by Robert R. Breen, Jr, Tammy L. Breen. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
