Espinoza v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
| Alberto Espinoza |
| Kroger Limited Partnership I |
| 3:2018cv00760 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Kroger Limited Partnership I.(O'Shaughnessy, Brian) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Faith Clair Whittaker as Pro hac vice for Kroger Limited Partnership I. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/14/2018. (smej, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Michael Baringhaus Mattingly to appear as Pro hac vice for Kroger Limited Partnership I. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/14/2018. (smej, )
|
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Faith Clair Whittaker and Certification of Local Counsel Brian O'Shaughnessy Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6359375. by Kroger Limited Partnership I. (O'Shaughnessy, Brian) |
| Filing 5 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael Baringhaus Mattingly and Certification of Local Counsel Brian O'Shaughnessy Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6359374. by Kroger Limited Partnership I. (O'Shaughnessy, Brian) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the Court GRANTS the Motion for Extension to Answer #3 . Kroger SHALL file its responsive pleadings no later than close of business November 16, 2018. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/08/2018. (smej, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, (Opposed) by Kroger Limited Partnership I. (O'Shaughnessy, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Kroger Limited Partnership I. (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number: 0422-6348048), filed by Kroger Limited Partnership I. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State court pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate disclosure statement)(O'Shaughnessy, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (smej, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Notice of Removal: Clerk notified attorney of proper procedures for filing the Financial Interest Disclosure Statement when open civil cases. (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Espinoza v. Kroger Limited Partnership I | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I | |
| Represented By: | Brian Patrick O'Shaughnessy |
| Represented By: | Faith Clair Whittaker |
| Represented By: | Michael Baringhaus Mattingly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alberto Espinoza | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Ryan Passero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
