Washington v. Williams et al
Ernest Donald Washington |
Harold Clarke and Tommy Williams |
3:2018cv00792 |
November 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Roderick C Young |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting Petitioner's request for extension of time to pay filing fee; Petitioner has 30 days from date of entry to pay the $5 filing fee; Copies mailed as directed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 1/9/19. (mful) |
Filing 11 Letter received from Ernest Donald Washington. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Ordering Payment of Filing Fee). Failure to pay the required fee or to file an explanation as outlined above within eleven ( 11) days of the date of entry hereof will result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 12/19/2018. Copy of this Memorandum Order mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, ) |
Filing 9 Letter Received by Ernest D. Washington dated December 11, 2018. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea, ) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Deerfield Correctional Center as to Ernest Donald Washington. (Attachment: #1 Account History). (sbea, ) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Ernest Donald Washington. (walk, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION and Affidavit in Support by Ernest Donald Washington to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (walk, ) |
Filing 5 PETITION by Ernest Donald Washington Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody. (walk, ) |
Filing 4 Supplement received by Ernest Donald Washington re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea, ) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Denying as Unnecessary Motion for 2244 and Requiring Petitioner to Complete the Standardized Form). Accordingly, the Verified Motion (ECF No. 1) is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. Upon initial consideration of the Verified Motion, it is ORDERED that: 1. The action is CONDITIONALLY FILED;Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Petitioner the standardized form for filing a 2254 petition. The Clerk shall WRITE the civil action number for the present action on the form. Petitioner is DIRECTED to complete and return the form to the Court within eleven (11) days of the date of entry hereof. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a Notice & Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate form. Petitioner should only return this form if Petitioner consents to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. If Petitioner consents to the jurisdiction ofthe Magistrate Judge, Petitioner should return this form within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof. See Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 11/28/2018. Copy of Memorandum Order, Notice & Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate form, and 2254 Form were sent to Petitioner. Petitioner's trust fund account for the six (6) month period sent to place of incarceration with a copy of the Memorandum Order..(ccol, ) Modified on 11/28/2018 (ccol, ). |
Filing 2 Letter received by Plaintiff Washington regarding certificate of appealability. (ccol, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ernest Donald Washington. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(ccol, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.