E. Claiborne Robins Company, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD.
E. Claiborne Robins Company, Inc. |
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
3:2018cv00827 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to AMENDED COMPLAINT as to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD. (one set via Hague Convention), one set for company in United States), and as to Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(jtho, ) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by E. Claiborne Robins Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Wolf, Thomas) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD. Summons handed to filing attorney's legal assistant in the Clerk's Office. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Hague Convention Documents) (smej, ) |
Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by E. Claiborne Robins Company, Inc.. (Wolf, Thomas) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6385455.), filed by E. Claiborne Robins Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Wolf, Thomas) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/7/2018) (smej, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.