Seaman v. YouTube, LLC et al
Plaintiff: David Seaman
Defendant: YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv00833
Filed: December 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Henry E Hudson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2019 Filing 15 Memorandum in Support re #14 MOTION to Transfer Case or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss, #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration)(Ascarrunz, Veronica)
January 25, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION to Transfer Case or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss by Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ascarrunz, Veronica)
January 25, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ascarrunz, Veronica)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Brian M. Willen to appear as Pro hac vice for Google, LLC and YouTube, LLC. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/14/2018. (smej, )
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings to Complaint (ECF No. #9 ). Defendants represented that Plaintiff consents to Defendants' request. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED, and Defendants YouTube, LLC and Google LLC are hereby ORDERED to file their response to the Complaint on or before January 25, 2019. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/13/2018. (sbea, )
December 12, 2018 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by YouTube, LLC, Google, LLC. (Ascarrunz, Veronica)
December 12, 2018 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to Complaint by Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ascarrunz, Veronica)
December 12, 2018 Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Brian M. Willen and Certification of Local Counsel Veronica S. Ascarrunz Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6403785. by Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC. (Ascarrunz, Veronica)
December 12, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Veronica Susana Ascarrunz on behalf of Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC (Ascarrunz, Veronica)
December 12, 2018 Notice of Correction re: #7 Notice of Appearance; Clerk notified filing attorney to use the /s/ signature block with documents submitted to the Court. Documents filed electronically should not include an original signature. No further action is required at this time. (sbea, )
December 11, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONSES Returned Executed by David Seaman. Google, LLC and YouTube, LLC served on 12/05/2018, Answer due 12/26/2018. (Attachment: #1 Letter from Counsel for Plaintiff). (walk, )
December 4, 2018 Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to Google, LLC and YouTube, LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant. Serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the additional copy of the summons (executed or unexecuted) on paper to the Clerk's Office. (walk, )
December 4, 2018 Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, (Google, LLC) by David Seaman. (Biss, Steven)
December 4, 2018 Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, (YouTube, LLC) by David Seaman. (Biss, Steven)
December 4, 2018 Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by David Seaman. (Biss, Steven)
December 4, 2018 Notice of Correction re: Documents #3 & #4 : For all future cases, the filing user is requested to file all proposed summonses in one separate filing using the filing event: Proposed Summons located under Other Documents. The Clerk's Office prefers only one filing, regardless of the number of proposed summonses. The filing user is requested to contact the Clerk's Office if further assistance is needed. (walk, )
December 3, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint filed by David Seaman against YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-6390672). Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Biss, Steven). Modified docket entry and regenerated NEF on 12/04/2018. (walk, )
December 3, 2018 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (walk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seaman v. YouTube, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YouTube, LLC
Represented By: Brian M. Willen
Represented By: Veronica Susana Ascarrunz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google, LLC
Represented By: Brian M. Willen
Represented By: Veronica Susana Ascarrunz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Seaman
Represented By: Steven Scott Biss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?