The Harford Mutual Insurance Company v. Small, et al
| The Harford Mutual Insurance Company |
| Marcela Small and Jack Small |
| 3:2018cv00846 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by The Harford Mutual Insurance Company. (Boyce, Dawn) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Marcela Small, Jack Small. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Remove header and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 summons 2)(tjoh, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by The Harford Mutual Insurance Company. (Boyce, Dawn) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by The Harford Mutual Insurance Company. (Boyce, Dawn) |
| Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-6397963), filed by The Harford Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyce, Dawn). (Additional attachment added on 12/11/2018: #2 Exhibit 1). Clerk replaced the Complaint and added the Exhibit at the request of filing attorney on 12/11/2018. NEF was regenerated. Modified docket text on 12/11/2018 (sbea, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
