Fortune v. Thrillist Media Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Fortune
Defendant: JackThreads, Inc. and Thrillist Media Group, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00859
Filed: December 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Henry E Hudson
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to the Amended Complaint for Thrillist Media Group, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove headers and print out two copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant. Serve one copy of the summons and one copy of the Amended Complaint upon the Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the additional copy of the summons for the Defendant (executed or unexecuted) on paper to the Clerk's Office. (sbea, ) (
February 5, 2019 Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #4 Amended Complaint by James Fortune. (Sensenig, David) (Main Document 5 replaced on 2/5/2019) (sbea, ).
February 5, 2019 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Thrillist Media Group, Inc., filed by James Fortune. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sensenig, David)
February 5, 2019 Notice of Correction re: #5 Proposed Summons; Clerk notified filing attorney of proper filing procedures for saving a PDF fillable form. Clerk has properly saved and replaced the document. Proposed Summons will be prepared as directed. (sbea, )
January 3, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JackThreads, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: REMOVE HEADERS and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, )
January 2, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by James Fortune. (Sensenig, David)
December 13, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-6405140), filed by James Fortune. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Redacted) (Sensenig, David). Clerk replaced Complaint to include the Civil Action Number and modified Exhibit label name on 12/13/2018. NEF was regenerated. Modified docket text on 12/13/2018 (sbea, ).
December 13, 2018 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (sbea, )
December 13, 2018 Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint; Clerk notified filing attorney that the Civil Action Number was omitted from the Complaint. Clerk has corrected the document and replaced it. The attorney was also requested to submit the proposed summons. (sbea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fortune v. Thrillist Media Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Fortune
Represented By: David James Sensenig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JackThreads, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thrillist Media Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?