Harrison v. Gregg et al
Plaintiff: Earlando Harrison
Defendant: Artisha Gregg and Timothy Forbes
Case Number: 3:2019cv00034
Filed: January 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Henry E Hudson
Referring Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER Filing Action and Screening Because Inmate Cannot Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee. The action is FILED and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Order to Plaintiff. A copy of this Memorandum Order and Plaintiff's consent to collection of fees shall be sent to the accounting department at Plaintiff's place of incarceration. See Order for complete details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 02/26/2019. Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff and consent to collection of fees and Memorandum Order sent to place of incarceration.(ccol, )
February 19, 2019 Filing 9 Letter Response by Earlando Harrison to #8 Memorandum Order. (walk, )
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Assessing Initial Partial Filing Fee) that Plaintiff to submit partial filing fee of $5.30 within eleven (11) days of entry hereof or state under penalty of perjury that he does not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee. 2. Plaintiff remains liable for the entire filing fee of $350.00. Within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof, the Court will contact Plaintiff's place of incarceration. The institution will then forward to the Court twenty percent (20%)of all deposits into Plaintiff's account until the full $350.00 filing fee is paid. Accordingly, the Motion for Discovery #4 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 02/07/2019. Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff. (ccol, )
February 1, 2019 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Baskerville Correctional Unit as to Earlando Harrison. (walk, )
January 31, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Earlando Harrison. (jsmi, )
January 31, 2019 Filing 5 Consent to Collection of Fees by Earlando Harrison. (jsmi, )
January 28, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Discovery and Production of Documents Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) Governing 42 U.S.C. 1983 Proceedings by Earlando Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, )
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof, Plaintiff must submit a statement under oath or under penalty of perjury. The Court is forwarding to Plaintiff an affidavit for compliance with the above procedures. Failure to complete the affidavit in its entirety will result in summary dismissal of the action. Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 1/24/2019. Forms mailed to Prisoner: IFP, Consent to Collection Forms and Memorandum Order. Inmate Account Form mailed to Institution.(ccol, )
January 11, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Timothy Forbes and Artisha Gregg, filed by Earlando Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, )
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Directing Clerk to Re-File Complaint as a New Civil Action). Because it appears that Plaintiff remains intent on litigating the underlying action, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to re-file his Complaint as a new civil action. The Clerk shall DOCKET a copy of this Memorandum Order in the new civil action. Once a new civil action has been opened, the Court will process the action, and Plaintiff will receive the appropriate paperwork to complete and return. The instant civil action, however, remains closed, and no further action will be taken. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 01/11/2019. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
January 11, 2019 Prisoner Case Referred to Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young. (smej, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrison v. Gregg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Artisha Gregg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earlando Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?