Brown v. Clarke et al
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Immanuel El-Bey |
United States Supreme Court, Harold Clarke, United States of America and Untied States Congress |
3:2019cv00081 |
February 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John A Gibney |
Roderick C Young |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Milton Antoine Brown. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 7 "AFFIDAVIT NOTICE OF SUBROGATION" by Milton Antoine Brown. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Milton Antoine Brown. (jsmi, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:19-cv-00075. Original file and docket sheet received. |
Notification of transfer of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:19cv75 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, ) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Milton Antoine Brown.Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (slt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/8/2019.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Milton Antoine Brown. (slt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/8/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.