O'Carroll v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Joseph O'Carroll, III |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Samuel I. White P.C. |
| 3:2019cv00115 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Memorandum in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Pocock, Donald) (Main Document 16 replaced on 4/15/2019) (smej, ). |
| Filing 15 Memorandum in Support re #14 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Joseph O'Carroll, III. (Thompson, Heath) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Joseph O'Carroll, III. (Thompson, Heath) |
| Filing 13 Memorandum in Support re #12 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 12(b)(6) filed by Samuel I. White P.C.. (Guillot, Ronald) |
| Filing 12 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 12(b)(6) by Samuel I. White P.C.. (Guillot, Ronald) |
Filing 11
AGREED ORDER GRANTING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Defendant, Samuel I. White, P.C. ("SIWPC"), is hereby GRANTED a brief enlargement of time to file initial pleadings in response to the Complaint through and including March 15, 2019. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 03/15/2019. (smej, )
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Pocock, Donald) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Pocock, Donald) Modified docket text on 3/15/2019 (smej, ). |
| Filing 8 Memorandum in Support re #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Compl. filed by Samuel I. White P.C.. (Guillot, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Compl. by Samuel I. White P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Guillot, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Samuel I. White P.C.. (Guillot, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald James Guillot, Jr on behalf of Samuel I. White P.C. (Guillot, Ronald) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading). THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.'s ("Defendant") Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading #3 . Upon due consideration, and finding good cause to do so, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the time within which Defendant may respond to the Complaint is extended to March 15, 2019. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/04/2019. (smej, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint [Ex. 1-1 to ECF No. 1] by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pocock, Donald) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Pocock, Donald) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing fee: $400, receipt number: 0422-6503677), filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet) (Pocock, Donald) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
