Tung v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: Yung On Tung
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, FRANK REFFEL, Kirstjen M. Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna
Case Number: 3:2019cv00121
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John A Gibney
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - On March 27, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(1)(A)(ii) #14 . The Court acknowledges this voluntary dismissal and DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 03/27/2019. (smej, )
March 27, 2019 Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Yung On Tung. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vance, Robert)
March 22, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Tyler Lucier on behalf of L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, FRANK REFFEL, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Lucier, Jonathan)
March 5, 2019 Filing 12 Certificate Reporting Service. L. Francis Cissna served on 2/28/2019, answer due 4/29/2019; Kirstjen M. Nielsen served on 2/28/2019, answer due 4/29/2019; FRANK REFFEL served on 2/28/2019, answer due 4/29/2019; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 2/28/2019, answer due 4/29/2019; U.S. Department of Homeland Security served on 2/28/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. (jsmi, )
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Pro hac vice. Edward Joseph Cuccia appointed for Yung On Tung. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 2/27/2019. (jsmi, )
February 26, 2019 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jsmi, )
February 25, 2019 Filing 9 Joint Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Edward Joseph Cuccia and Certification of Local Counsel Robert Leonard Vance Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6509475. by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 25, 2019 Filing 8 DISREGARD FILING - FILED IN ERROR. Joint Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Edward Joseph Cuccia and Certification of Local Counsel Robert Leonard Vance by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert) Modified on 2/26/2019 (jsmi, ).
February 25, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (jsmi, )
February 22, 2019 Filing 7 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 22, 2019 Filing 6 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 22, 2019 Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 22, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 22, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Yung On Tung. (Vance, Robert)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6506799.), filed by Yung On Tung. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vance, Robert) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/25/2019) (jsmi, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tung v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yung On Tung
Represented By: Robert Leonard Vance
Represented By: Edward Joseph Cuccia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANK REFFEL
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Francis Cissna
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?