Hunter v. Fairfax Medical Department et al
| Charles Hunter |
| Administrator Giles, Nurse Supervisor Charles Antwi and Fairfax Medical Department |
| 3:2019cv00145 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Response to #2 Order, filed by Charles Hunter. (smej, ) |
Filing 2
ORDER - Because the Court finds that the application lacks credibility the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 . The Court DIRECTS Hunter to file an accurate and complete application no later than April 12, 2019. The failure to strictly comply with the Court's directives and with applicable rules will result in DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 03/18/2019. (Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff with a Long Form IFP application) (smej, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (RECEIVED), #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (smej, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2019: #4 Unmarked Exhibit 1, #5 Unmarked Exhibit 2, #6 Unmarked Exhibit 3, #7 Unmarked Exhibit 4, #8 Unmarked Exhibit 5, #9 Unmarked Exhibit 6) (smej, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
