Blagmon v. Meyer
Petitioner: Darnell Bernard Blagmon
Respondent: Warden Thomas Meyer
Case Number: 3:2019cv00245
Filed: April 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2019 Filing 2 Memorandum of Law in Support to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Darnell Bernard Blagmon. (McMahon, Beth Susanne)
April 8, 2019 Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0422-6580596.), filed by Darnell Bernard Blagmon.(McMahon, Beth Susanne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blagmon v. Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darnell Bernard Blagmon
Represented By: Beth Susanne Vanderzee McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Thomas Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?